What This Comedian Said Will Shock You

Maher critiques the tendency to judge historical figures and events by modern standards, a phenomenon he calls “presentism.” He argues that this perspective oversimplifies history, ignoring the context of past eras and the human capacity for growth. He challenges the idea that moral superiority lies in criticizing the past, pointing out that humanity has always evolved and will continue to do so. He also addresses the refusal to acknowledge societal progress, labeling it “progressophobia.” He points out the advancements in areas like racial equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and social inclusion while criticizing the belief that things are worse than ever. By denying progress, he contends, people develop distorted worldviews and flawed policies, such as perpetuating division instead of striving for a colorblind society.

He also takes issue with revisiting and condemning old media and behaviors by today’s standards. Instead of canceling the past, he suggests accepting that each generation has its own flaws and advancements.

Maher critiques various environmental issues in this chapter, focusing on humanity’s self-destructive tendencies and the contradictions in addressing global problems. He questions the effectiveness of small-scale environmental actions like banning plastic straws and points to the hypocrisy of elites who preach sustainability while relying on private jets and other carbon-heavy luxuries. He believes the larger issue lies in consumer habits, such as the waste generated by online shopping and fast fashion, prioritizing convenience over sustainability. He also discusses the inhumane practices in factory farming and the public health risks they create through antibiotic overuse and environmental harm.

Maher challenges the push to colonize Mars as a distraction from addressing Earth’s urgent issues. He views the fantasy of Mars as an escape from the consequences of humanity’s mistreatment of Earth, urging people to prioritize fixing the planet they already inhabit instead of romanticizing inhospitable alternatives. The overpopulation crisis is another focal point, with Maher emphasizing the environmental strain caused by an ever-growing population. He argues that societal pressures to maintain birth rates for economic growth ignore the planet’s finite resources and advocates celebrating declining birth rates to mitigate ecological damage.

In this chapter, Maher focuses on societal contradictions, overcorrections, and the pitfalls of performative allyship. He critiques the hypocrisy of organizations and individuals who prioritize financial interests over standing against human rights abuses, particularly when dealing with authoritarian regimes like China. He highlights instances where fear of offending or being labeled racist has led to a lack of accountability, even in the face of severe injustices such as concentration camps and censorship.

Maher examines liberal approaches that may inadvertently foster division under the guise of progress. He discusses practices like separate dormitories, graduation ceremonies, and the use of multiple national anthems at public events. These actions, he argues, work against unity and bring back outdated ideas associated with “separate but equal.” He argues that shared spaces and interactions are essential for building a more connected and inclusive society. He also believes that an overcorrection in discussions about race often leads white liberals to engage in exaggerated self-blame, such as publicly apologizing for their whiteness or sharing performative statements. Maher critiques these behaviors as usually unhelpful and awkward for those they aim to support. For instance, some individuals try to demonstrate allyship by posting black squares on social media during protests but face criticism for not framing their support in the “correct” way. Maher suggests that real progress comes from authentic connections and shared experiences rather than performative gestures or constant displays of guilt that may alienate others rather than build understanding.

In this chapter, Maher discusses immigration and national identity. He criticizes the modern political landscape where both the Left and Right often express disdain for different aspects of the country. He critiques Republicans for undermining foundational principles like democracy, voting rights, and respect for institutions such as the FBI and the military, pointing out their hypocrisy in claiming to love America while attacking its core structures. He argues that figures like Trump have reshaped the GOP’s stance, from mocking veterans like John McCain to downplaying the role of law enforcement in events like the January 6 insurrection. On the Left, he critiques the fixation on America’s past mistakes, arguing that it often leads to an exaggerated portrayal of the country as fundamentally broken and incapable of redemption.

Maher praises immigrants for their appreciation of America, contrasting their gratitude with the cynicism of many Americans who fail to recognize the freedoms and opportunities they take for granted. He suggests that immigrants provide valuable perspective, as many come from places with severe oppression, violence, or poverty and view America as a far better alternative. Maher mocks the border wall as an impractical and symbolic solution that does little to address the reality of immigration. He notes that most undocumented immigrants enter legally and overstay visas, undermining the premise that a wall would solve the issue.