70 pages 2 hours read

War

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 51-60Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 51 Summary

In November, efforts intensified to secure the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, with US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Qatari Prime Minister MBAR negotiating closely. A successful pilot deal saw two American hostages freed, which emboldened President Biden to push Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for a longer ceasefire to secure more hostages. Although Netanyahu resisted, intense diplomatic back-and-forth interactions culminated in a phased release of 105 hostages by the end of the month. However, as Hamas held out on releasing young women, likely due to the strategic value of these hostages, the ceasefire eventually broke down, and hostilities resumed.

Chapter 52 Summary

On Christmas Day, 2023, Brett McGurk received an urgent call about an Iranian-backed drone attack that had injured US troops in Iraq. This incident escalated as President Biden authorized targeted strikes on militia sites and, later, on specific individuals linked to the attacks. Despite these efforts, threats from the Houthis in Yemen intensified, prompting a series of US-led air and naval strikes. Through indirect talks in Oman, McGurk warned Iran to restrain its proxies, yet further aggression led to a major US retaliatory operation on February 2, targeting Iranian-linked sites in Iraq and Syria. Amid rising political criticism, Biden sought a controlled response to avoid a broader conflict.

Chapter 53 Summary

On January 8, Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) to gauge Saudi Arabia’s interest in normalizing relations with Israel, a diplomatic milestone with potentially transformative implications for the Middle East. MBS expressed urgency in pursuing normalization but emphasized that this point hinged on two conditions: a peaceful situation in Gaza and a credible pathway toward a Palestinian state. Following this, Blinken met with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, who appeared open to the Saudi proposal but expressed hesitation about the specifics of a Palestinian pathway. Despite Blinken’s insistence on concrete, irreversible commitments, Netanyahu’s approach was tentative, prioritizing security concerns over any definitive political resolution for Palestinians.

Chapter 54 Summary

On January 14, 2024, Blinken and Sullivan met with President Biden at Camp David to discuss diplomatic challenges and US strategy in the Middle East. Blinken briefed Biden on his conversations with Saudi Crown Prince MBS about potential normalization with Israel and his candid discussions with Netanyahu, who remained reluctant to make concessions for a Palestinian state. Biden saw Israeli military plans in Gaza, especially around Rafah, as a humanitarian crisis in the making and stressed to Blinken that the US could not support such operations without a clear civilian protection plan. Despite urging for a Palestinian pathway and international support, Netanyahu’s resistance strained US-Israel relations, and American public support waned amid reports of rising civilian casualties in Gaza. Biden ultimately insisted on drawing a “line at Rafah” and sought alternative strategies, emphasizing that support for Israel must not extend to offensive military actions without civilian safeguards.

Chapter 55 Summary

In March 2024, former President Trump spoke with retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, who remained a staunch supporter of Trump’s policies and was actively engaged in his 2024 campaign. When reflecting on Trump’s decisive leadership style, Kellogg contrasted it with Biden’s, whom he viewed as overly cautious. He underscored Trump’s willingness to support Israel and his direct approach to Middle Eastern diplomacy, recounting his belief that Biden’s focus on humanitarian concerns in Gaza weakened the US stance on Hamas. Kellogg also touched on his recent meetings with Israeli officials and their resolute stance on eradicating Hamas. Meanwhile, Trump’s former advisors, such as Robert O’Brien, were quietly working to re-establish relationships with foreign governments in anticipation of a potential second term, presenting Trump’s leadership as more stable and predictable.

Chapter 56 Summary

In March 2024, Senator Lindsey Graham’s diplomatic efforts continued as he traveled to Saudi Arabia to maintain negotiations for a potential normalization treaty between Saudi Arabia and Israel. Graham arranged calls between Crown Prince MBS and various US officials, including former President Trump and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, to gauge support and strategy. MBS reiterated his conditions for normalization, primarily a credible commitment to a Palestinian state, while Graham emphasized that normalization could only succeed under President Biden’s term, as it required bipartisan support in Congress. Despite MBS’s stated ambition, obstacles remained, particularly due to shifting Israeli sentiments post-October 7 and concerns over Saudi nuclear ambitions. Graham reminded MBS of the strategic advantages of a defense cooperation agreement with the US, which would act as protection against Iran, framing this as an essential element of Saudi security.

Chapter 57 Summary

On April 1, 2024, Israel conducted a targeted airstrike that killed Mohammad Reza Zahedi, a high-ranking Iranian commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and six others. Ambassador Michael Herzog informed US officials, who expressed concerns over the potential for severe Iranian retaliation. Iran quickly responded by condemning the US as complicit, though the White House asserted that it had no involvement. Heightened security measures ensued as US forces braced for further conflict escalation, particularly fearing Hezbollah’s involvement. Days later, President Biden discussed Iran’s brewing hostility with Netanyahu, also challenging his plans for continued operations in Gaza. While the US prepared to assist Israel defensively, Biden cautioned Netanyahu on the need for specific humanitarian efforts in Gaza. In response to an unprecedented missile attack anticipated from Iran, the US and allied forces mobilized defense preparations to prevent further destabilization.

Chapter 58 Summary

On April 13, 2024, Iran launched an unprecedented attack, Operation True Promise, on Israel, coordinating UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles to hit targets simultaneously. The US and allies, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and European countries, mobilized a sophisticated missile defense to intercept the incoming threats. Despite successfully neutralizing most of the missiles, four impacts occurred in Israel, leading to minimal casualties but heightening tensions. President Biden urged Prime Minister Netanyahu to consider this defense a victory, discouraging retaliatory strikes. After intense debate within Israel’s cabinet, a limited Israeli response targeted Iran’s air defenses near Isfahan, sending a clear but contained message. Both nations chose restraint in publicizing the incident, ultimately preventing a larger escalation.

Chapter 59 Summary

In spring 2024, CIA Director Bill Burns made an important visit to Ukraine, where he assessed the growing strain on Ukrainian President Zelensky and his forces, who were facing severe shortages in ammunition and air defenses. Burns observed Zelensky’s resilience despite exhaustion and the mounting challenges. With the recent fall of Avdiivka due to dwindling supplies, Burns returned to Washington to urge Congress to continue funding Ukraine, warning that without support, Ukraine’s capacity to defend itself would crumble. He emphasized the broader global stakes, arguing that US withdrawal would embolden adversaries like China and strengthen Xi Jinping’s resolve over Taiwan, highlighting the importance of continued US commitment as a deterrent.

Chapter 60 Summary

Chapter 60 examines President Biden’s complex battle with immigration policy and the US-Mexico border crisis, which intensified as the 2024 election approached. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, tasked with managing escalating border issues, faced sharp criticism from Republicans who blamed Biden’s more humanitarian approach for a surge in migrant crossings. With asylum cases reaching an overwhelming backlog, Biden advocated for comprehensive immigration reform, which was stalled in Congress. Meanwhile, former President Trump’s strong influence over Republican opposition complicated Biden’s efforts to find a bipartisan solution. As Republican Speaker Mike Johnson and others called for a return to Trump-era policies, Mayorkas’s impeachment fueled the partisan divide over immigration and highlighted the struggle for effective border management amid conflicting policies and public opinion.

Chapters 51-60 Analysis

In this section, Woodward’s exploration of Middle East conflicts and regional diplomacy offers a nuanced examination of the dynamics shaping US-Israel relations and broader geopolitical stability. Through portrayals of high-stakes negotiations and strategic decision-making, Woodward illuminates the challenges that leaders face in balancing national security interests with ethical responsibilities. Brett McGurk’s characterization of Netanyahu as someone who “always wants to squeeze every ounce of blood from the stone” captures the prime minister’s relentless and often uncompromising approach to diplomacy (177). This metaphor not only highlights Netanyahu’s tenacity but also underscores the strain that such an unyielding stance places on diplomatic relations, particularly in humanitarian crises. Woodward uses this imagery to critique the potential of political maneuvering to overshadow compassionate responses, reflecting the tension between Political Power and Ethical Responsibility.

President Biden’s assertion that “[g]reat powers don’t bluff” serves as a cornerstone of his foreign policy philosophy (181), emphasizing the importance of credibility and consistent action in maintaining international alliances. This statement reinforces Biden’s commitment to a principled approach in which the US upholds its promises to allies without resorting to empty threats. Woodward’s inclusion of this quote underscores the administration’s strategic emphasis on reliability and deterrence, both of which are essential for fostering Back-Channel Diplomacy and Global Stability. By contrasting Biden’s straightforward stance with Netanyahu’s aggressive tactics, Woodward effectively highlights the differing methodologies in handling regional conflicts, illustrating how profoundly these approaches impact the broader geopolitical landscape.

Antony Blinken’s frustration with Netanyahu’s “creative wordsmithing” reveals a critical challenge in diplomatic negotiations: the need for concrete commitments over vague assurances. Blinken’s insistence that “you can’t find a way to weasel out of whatever words you put down on a piece of paper” underscores the necessity for substantive agreements to build trust and achieve lasting peace (185). Woodward leverages this interaction to demonstrate the limitations of rhetoric in conflict resolution, emphasizing the administration’s demand for tangible progress in peace efforts. This dynamic illustrates the ongoing struggle to reconcile Israel’s security priorities with the international community’s call for humane and sustainable solutions, further reinforcing the theme of The Fragile Balance of Democracy and Autocracy.

Biden’s ultimatum in the statement, “If you don’t do that and we don’t see results then you’ve lost me” (201), illustrates the administration’s strategic patience and conditional support. This statement also indicates Biden’s willingness to withdraw aid unless specific humanitarian outcomes were achieved, highlighting the delicate balance between supporting allies and enforcing ethical standards. Woodward uses this quote to emphasize the high stakes involved in US-Israel relations, where the pursuit of military objectives must be tempered with humanitarian considerations. This approach underscores the administration’s commitment to Political Power and Ethical Responsibility, demonstrating how strategic decisions are influenced by both ethical imperatives and geopolitical realities.

The strategic restraint advocated by Biden, as seen in his advice to Netanyahu, reflects a deliberate effort to prevent further escalation, as when he urged the Israeli leader to “take time to think through the next move […] You don’t need to make another move. Do nothing” (205). Woodward portrays this counsel as an attempt to balance immediate security concerns with the need for long-term stability, highlighting the administration’s focus on delivering measured and calculated responses. This emphasis on restraint aligns with the theme of Back-Channel Diplomacy and Global Stability, showcasing the fact that strategic patience and thoughtful deliberation are paramount in managing volatile conflicts without provoking additional aggression.

Bill Burns’s insight, “If you want to deter Xi, then show we’re capable of staying in Ukraine, a war of territorial conquest” (207), links the Ukraine conflict to broader global strategic objectives, particularly concerning China’s ambitions. This statement illustrates how the US sees its involvement in Ukraine as a pivotal element in maintaining deterrence against other global powers. Woodward uses this connection to highlight the interconnectedness of regional conflicts and global security strategies, reinforcing the theme of Back-Channel Diplomacy and Global Stability. By framing the Ukraine war as a test of US resolve, Burns emphasized the importance of sustained support and strategic commitment in upholding international norms and preventing territorial conquests by authoritarian regimes.

Throughout his analysis, Woodward continues to incorporate powerful statements by dominant figures on the world stage, and Alejandro Mayorkas’s succinct declaration, “Hate is its own ammunition” (211), speaks to the destructive power of divisive rhetoric and its role in fueling conflicts. Woodward employs this statement to emphasize the broader societal and psychological impacts of hate-driven narratives, which can undermine diplomatic efforts and escalate violence. This phrase reflects the underlying tension between combating extremist ideologies and maintaining cohesive international alliances, indicating that emotional and ideological factors can influence strategic decisions. The inclusion of this quote underscores the importance of addressing the root causes of hatred and division in order to achieve lasting peace; this approach aligns with the theme of The Fragile Balance of Democracy and Autocracy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 70 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools