26 pages 52 minutes read

Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2016

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “In Bitter Safety I Awake”

Junger opens Chapter 3 with an account of his discovery that he suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after returning from covering the war in Afghanistan. He describes having panic attacks when in confined spaces; when they passed, he would experience outpourings of emotion at things that would otherwise have been innocuous. This experience was followed by dreams that were not scary but nonetheless triggered “a catastrophic outpouring of sorrow” (75). He would wake up trying to figure out:

[…] why feelings that seemed to belong to other people kept spilling out of me. I wasn’t a soldier—though I’d spent plenty of time with soldiers—and at that point I hadn’t lost any close friends in combat. And yet when I went to sleep, it was like I became part of some larger human experience that was utterly heartbreaking. It was far too much to acknowledge when I was awake. […] The human concern for others would seem to be the one story that, adequately told, no person can fully bear to hear (75-76).

He came to understand these powerful conscious and subconscious experiences in two ways. First, war is not exclusively toxic; it also ennobles and empowers “ancient human virtues” that can be “utterly intoxicating” to the people who experience them as well as instrumental to the well-being of human societies (77). Second, Junger came to learn that his post-traumatic stress was manifesting in an entirely interior manner because, outside of the war theater, there was no context within which war as an experience could be held in common with other people.

Acute PTSD, as Junger explains, makes mammals reactive to danger and keeps them safe until a threat has passed. Almost everyone exposed to trauma has this short-term reaction, Junger says; long-term PTSD, on the other hand, is maladaptive and relatively uncommon, with at most 20% of traumatized people suffering from long-term PTSD (80). The difficulty with war as compared with other forms of trauma is that the horror of combat is interwoven with enriching experiences. The injury thus becomes hard to distinguish from the positive aspects that come with it. By comparison, most rape survivors experience significant decline in their PTSD symptoms within weeks or months of their assault—a far faster recovery rate than soldiers have exhibited in the recent wars America has fought.

Junger cites a number of studies that bring him to an unexpected conclusion. Researchers have found that a person’s chance of getting chronic PTSD is a function of their experiences before going to war; more than 80% of psychiatric casualties in the first Gulf War came from support units that experienced little to no combat, and disability claims and combat intensity move in an almost inverse relationship with one another—as combat intensity and deaths decline, psychiatric casualty rates have gone up. For Junger, the evidence suggests that the problem with PTSD lies not with battlefield trauma but rather with reentry into American society. What people are suffering from, Junger concludes, is not the lingering effects of violence or a longing for danger, but rather the stress of social isolation that exceeds even the stress of combat. The unity and social connectedness that common danger often engenders is precisely what is largely missing in modern peacetime Western society. 

Chapter 3 Analysis

“In Bitter Safety I Awake” is the climax of the social scientific analysis in Tribe. Junger’s emotional pinnacle will come in the fourth and final chapter. Chapter 3 moves away from the historical anecdotes of the earlier chapters and focuses more on the data emergent from recent generations of US military veterans, supplemented as always with cross-cultural anthropological comparisons.

For all of his critique of Western society, Junger enjoins a rich tradition of Western social thought that brings scientific knowledge to bear on social problems. The point of such science, the thinking goes, is to change society, and Junger’s insight that PTSD “is a disorder of recovery” focuses the readers’ attentions to what they can do in positively affecting soldiers’ lives after war (95-96). Junger emphasizes this point through a comparison with Israel—where rates of PTSD among soldiers are infinitesimal compared with US soldiers—a society with what author and ethicist Austin Dacey calls a “shared public meaning” of war. Some observers of American culture have noted that the high rates of gun violence, substance abuse, and domestic violence and sexual assault in the United States are closely tied to the state of permanent war-making by the US government. Junger might say that this is a form of collective PTSD—the opposite of what he means by a shared public understanding of war that gives soldiers a context for their losses and their sacrifice, and keeps at bay the sense of futility and rage that can develop among soldiers (and civilians) in the context of endless war (97).

Junger’s prescriptive for countering the long-term incidence of PTSD is an instructive example of putting social science—and good common sense—to work for the betterment of society. It is important to note that his prescriptives come straight out of the movement against violence against women. Junger has amended our understanding of PTSD to a social symptom, not a sign of individual pathology. Chronic PTSD is a function of hierarchical and alienating societies; social cohesion and egalitarianism, by contrast, mitigate the long-term effects of trauma. Anti-rape activists, similarly, have long argued for a focus on rape culture, not on individual victims and perpetrators. Since rape is an act of dominance through the language of sex, societies with high authoritarianism and power inequities tend to have higher rates of sexual assault.

Second, Junger calls for former soldiers to be seen as survivors, not as victims, echoing feminist criticisms about how American culture and the US legal system disempower survivors, thereby exacerbating harm and deferring healing. Third, Junger notes that veterans need to feel that they are just as valued and productive at home as they were on the battlefield. In other words, collective empowerment is the best antidote to individual suffering and alienation. As feminists have long argued, let the voice of survivors be heard, and the healing will be communal. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 26 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools