logo

52 pages 1 hour read

Theatre of the Oppressed

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1977

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 3 Summary: “Hegel and Brecht: The Character as Subject or the Character as Object?”

The “Epic” Concept

In this chapter, Boal breaks down different interpretations of the word “epic” throughout history. When Marxism began to change the landscape of art and theater, epic theater took on a new meaning. However, the new use of an old term created confusion.

Aristotle created strict definitions for epic poetry, tragedies, and comedies. For the Greek philosopher, the difference between epic poetry and tragedy lies in the tense of the action. The tense of epic poetry occurs in the past, while tragedies take place in the present. As Boal explains, “Aristotle adds that all the elements of epic poetry are found in tragedy, but not all the elements of tragedy are present in poetry” (83). Over time, however, Aristotle’s definitions were abandoned, and modern interpretations of the word have been expanded to include films that exhibit mass murders and violence.

German director Erwin Piscator developed a new meaning of “epic” for his performances. Piscator used multimedia tools such as slides and graphics to break the traditional form. Director Bertolt Brecht took this a step further, developing a type of epic theater that acts as a response to Hegel’s definition of epic poetry.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 52 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,600+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools