64 pages 2 hours read

The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1975

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

IntroductionChapter Summaries & Analyses

Introduction Summary: “The Struggle for Meaning”

Bettelheim argues that meaning and meaning-making—that is, making sense of one’s experiences—is fundamental to human happiness and the ability to cope with adversity. Parents cannot impose their own sense of meaning on a child; rather, the child must find it itself and at their own pace. Bettelheim believes self-understanding is the most essential step towards meaning: By understanding oneself, one can progress to understanding others and forming relationships with them.

Writing as a psychoanalytic therapist to troubled children in the 1970s, Bettelheim believes that his duty is to restore a sense of meaning to their lives. He finds that many modern children’s books do not help him in this endeavor, as they do not prepare children sufficiently for problems in the real world. These books share the dominant cultural view that young children should be offered a sanitized version of the world, where harsh realities—such as death, aging, and the worst aspects of human behavior—are removed. The problem with this is that “children know that they are not always good; and often, even when they are, they would prefer not to be” (7). Thus, the censored characters in modern children’s literature contradict what children know to be true about themselves, and this makes the child “a monster in his own eyes” (7).

In contrast, says Bettelheim, fairy tales written and retold prior to the 20th century are better equipped to help a child deal with their turbulent feelings. These stories, which feature polarities of good and evil and show their young protagonists encountering the worst of human behavior, take seriously the most frightening parts of life while providing an optimistic view of a child’s ability to face such challenges. From a psychoanalytic perspective, these tales encourage ego development: They relieve unconscious pressures by giving license to the id and showing how these shadowy parts can be brought into alignment with the expectations of the ego and superego. Importantly, the fairy tale, like psychoanalytic therapy, enables the child to accept the inevitable obstacles of life without being defeated by them.

While evil characters pervade fairy tales, these tales guide the reader toward morality by having them identify with the hero. Importantly, Bettelheim emphasizes that a child’s moral behavior is predicated not on an altruistic impulse towards good but on a desire to resemble the hero. Similarly, these tales deal with universal fears, such as a fear of death, by offering the consolation of a lifelong bond to another. With such a happy ending, the fact of one’s eventual death seems irrelevant.

The “future-orientated” nature of the fairy tale negotiates the other universal in childhood development—separation anxiety and the unconscious wish to hold onto one’s mother eternally (11). Tales such as Hansel and Gretel show how those who aim to continue to depend on their parents are forced to change as they embark on the journey towards satisfying independence and peer bonds. Bettelheim argues that the changes in lifestyle between the time of fairy tales and the late 20th century are almost irrelevant, as the developmental problems children face are the same, especially regarding the sense of isolation present in childhood. Just as fairy tale heroes act alone, Bettelheim envisages a modern, city-dwelling child separated from their extended family and looking for meaning and rewarding interactions with the surrounding world.

Bettelheim writes the book to bring awareness to the importance of fairy tales. He argues that fairy tales are great works of art, and like all such works, each tale will meet each reader differently depending on their state of development. Rather than prescribing tales to their children and dictating what they should find significant, parents should instead allow their child to make their own journey through the stories, accepting that the child is finding motifs that support their development in the present moment.

Although Bettelheim urges parents to seek out the most original version of the fairy tale, he contradicts himself by saying the exact origins of the tales are obscure. He stresses that while most fairy tales have been lost, he will focus on the most popular and enduring ones.

Introduction Analysis

In his introduction, Bettelheim posits that fairy tales—those old-fashioned stories of hamlets and evil queens, which emerged from an oral-tradition—are a better companion to a growing child than contemporary realist children’s literature. By the time Bettelheim was writing in the 1970s, the baby boomer generation of children was growing up in relative prosperity and stability. For privileged white, middle-class families especially, childhood came to be viewed as a hallowed time that needed protection from the full-scale horrors in the adult world. Contemporary children’s literature reflected this attitude, refraining from dealing with the harshest parts of human experience and neglecting the primitive fears of violence that plague so many children.

Ironically, while the scenarios presented in modern realist texts may ring true to life, they give a vastly incomplete picture of a child’s internal world and thus provide children with inadequate tools to cope with a world and a self they know to be far from benign. Bettelheim argues that parents who “want their children’s minds to function as their own do” (3), and who seek an express ticket to their children’s maturation, are uncomfortable with the dark, fantastical content of fairy tales because these parents do not appreciate that their children must undergo developmental tribulations for themselves. While the modern works function as consolation texts—arguably even to the parents—for an imperfect childhood, fairy tales address the true turmoil of separating from one’s parents and becoming autonomous.

Further, Bettelheim parallels postwar, post-Vietnam American society’s misunderstanding of fairy tales to their misunderstanding of psychoanalysis. Guided by the national veneration of the American dream, which states that any wish is possible with enough hard work, Americans want to use psychoanalysis to improve their lives, whereas Bettelheim stipulates that psychoanalysis’ purpose is to help people understand life and cope with it. In fairy tales, the id—the animalistic, unconscious part of the personality—is given free rein through characters such as devouring giants and envious mothers. However, the id is ultimately controlled by the hero who acquires increasing ego strength as the story progresses. Through the hero, the child can find some sort of “American dream” trajectory, as they wishfully identify with the hero and are motivated to reach the next stage of psychological development. Bettelheim emphasizes that good identification with a hero character is a better motivator for maturation than pure altruism. In specifying this, Bettelheim encourages parents to accept that their children are reward-focused and even selfish (as a parent might otherwise hold onto idealistic views of their child’s character).

Bettelheim was writing during the peak years of the American feminist movement, and his work gestures towards abandoning stereotypes when he says that children will identify with fairy tale protagonists regardless of their assigned gender. However, his continual use of the masculine pronoun “he” suggests the default child he refers to is male; a fact that diminishes female experience, even when Bettelheim applies his insights to children of either gender. While an earlier generation of readers may have been in the habit of regarding references to a male subject as a default for all humanity, modern audiences may find this problematic. Nonbinary readers especially may question the authority of a writer who not only does not acknowledge but erases them. Bettelheim also shows he is a product of his time in targeting a white, middle-class American audience with a Eurocentric background. This is evident when he assumes that his audience’s familiarity with the same European fairy tales of the German Grimm Brothers, like Hansel and Gretel, and does takes no time to elaborate on the stories’ origins.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 64 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools