The Swiss Family Robinson

Wyss’s intent in writing the novel was to create a moral framework for his readers. How does the behavior of the characters—particularly the father—reflect this intent?

The Swiss Family Robinson can be read as a defense of colonialism. The Robinsons treat the island and its resources as their personal property. Does it matter that the island in uninhabited? How would the story be different if they had found people living there?

From the outset, the Robinsons begin naming landmarks for common points of reference—including “Prospect Hill” and “Shark Island”—but they don’t stop there. They name the treehouse, the cave house, and nearly every bit of territory they lay claim to. What is the purpose of giving familiar names to unfamiliar places?

When Fritz brings Jenny Montrose back to Rockburg, the family is eager to hear her story. However, Fritz recounts the tale, not Jenny. Why did Wyss choose to have Fritz tell Jenny’s story rather than Jenny herself?

The Swiss Family Robinson doesn’t conform to contemporary literary conventions: there is very little plot development, the characters are two-dimensional, and the conflicts are resolved a bit too easily. How might the novel be different if it was written today?

What moral lessons does Wyss try to convey to his readers? Are those lessons relevant today?

In the original edition, the story ends after the family has been on the island for only two years as Robinson wonders if they will ever be rescued. Wyss’s son and other translators revised later editions. How does the story change with the new ending? How does the Robinsons’ rescue allow for further character development?

Characters in contemporary fiction usually have an arc; they grow and change based on their experiences in the story. Do the Robinsons’ experiences change them in any important way, or do they remain virtually the same?