32 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The Moon is Down centers around one town’s experiences with occupation and the moral, ethical, and political implications of the actions on both sides of the war. Steinbeck discusses the moral complexities of war through the theme of performativity and how it occurs in different social, political, and military roles. By adhering to perceived duties and performing actions based on those duties, the characters of The Moon is Down struggle to differentiate between which actions are authentically theirs and which are performances given to fulfill perceived roles.
As the only character with past wartime experience, Colonel Lanser often remarks on how his staff is merely “playing war” by believing in the idealism their military recruiters and leaders disseminated among the soldiers prior to their deployment (22). Lanser himself acknowledges his own form of “playing war” by strictly adhering to protocol despite any disagreements he has with the actions his role forces him to take. This is seen in the performativity of Alex Morden’s execution trial. Lanser claims that “The coal miner must be shot publicly, because the theory is that others will then restrain themselves from killing our men” (49). Alex’s death is used as a performance of power by Lanser and his soldiers, as it fulfills their expected roles of conquerors and oppressors. Lanser acknowledges the futility of having a trial for a man that everyone present at the trial already knows will be shot by saying “...whether we know it or not, it is what must be done” (55). Lanser sets an example for his staff to perform the duties of their station under any circumstances.
The violence that Lanser and his soldiers enact upon the townspeople in response to their disobediences is another form of performativity, as the violence accomplishes nothing but is yet continued because Lanser, the soldiers, and Lanser’s superiors rely on violence as a means to assert power. “Nothing was cured by the shooting” (59) that Lanser’s soldiers frequently employ, as the townspeople continue to revolt against their conquerors, despite the threat of execution. Like Lanser’s derision on “playing war,” the violence of wartime is here displayed to be mere performativity and simulations of power struggles. Since war is associated with violence, executions, and oppression, then Lanser and his soldiers must fulfill that expectation.
As each character in the novel is relatively static, and the focus of Steinbeck’s writing is on the events of the plot and representing the ethical contradictions of war, then each character becomes a performance of a stereotype associated with war or power. Mayor Orden and Doctor Winter perform the roles of democratic, righteous leaders willing to give their lives to preserve the cause of the town’s freedom. Colonel Lanser, though often displaying moments of compassion and regret, performs the role of an oppressor when called to action. Steinbeck uses the performativity of each character’s role in war to highlight the strength of implied social, political, and military roles upon an individual’s actions.
Information disseminates through the novel in two ways: either official reports that Lanser receives from his military superiors and then announces, or through word of mouth among the townspeople. In The Moon is Down, Steinbeck emphasizes the uncanny ability a town has to discover the realities of a situation, disseminate the information among themselves, and act upon that information without needing corroboration from figures of authority. This kind of collective mindset and activity allows the town to enact a secretive revolt against Lanser’s occupation while under constant close surveillance.
Colonel Lanser anticipates this kind of collective communication when, soon after conquering the town, he expresses the belief that: “In marching, in mobs, in football games, and in war, outlines become vague; real things become unreal and a fog creeps over the mind” (23). This reflects the town’s ability to organize, like a team or mob, around a single purpose. In this case, their purpose is freedom. Lanser’s perspective on this collectivity of mind is grim, however, as he describes its ability to destabilize reality and impede rational, individual thought.
Conversely, Doctor Winter and Mayor Orden respect the semi-mystical way the town gathers information and acts upon it. When the two men discuss the town’s uncanny ability to know things they shouldn’t, Doctor Winter expresses: “That is a mystery that has disturbed rulers all over the world—how the people know” (44). Their view of collectivity is positive and strengthening to the cause of democratic freedom. The town is able to act together because they are able to communicate in ways their leaders can’t discern or anticipate, which allows the town to conduct a secretive revolt despite Colonel Lanser’s attempts to shield the townspeople from receiving news from outside the town or from the mayor.
Steinbeck discusses a group’s ability to act together for a common cause from both a positive and negative perspective. In the case of the town, Mayor Orden, and Doctor Winter, being able to act as a collective unit is instrumental in their fight for freedom from Lanser’s occupation. However, Lanser and his soldiers attempt to act collectively by following the orders given to them, but as their moralities and desires all differ, they are unable to withstand the townspeople’s strength of purpose. This theme allows Steinbeck to explore the moral and ethical requirements of successful collectivity in the context of war, democracy, and authoritarianism.
The Moon is Down demonstrates the conflict between democratic societies and those ruled by an authoritarian political system. After the town is conquered and occupied by an authoritarian force, the democratic ideals of the townspeople and their leader Mayor Orden must combat the military and political absolutism of Colonel Lanser’s forces. Though Lanser’s troops have access to lethal weapons and possible reinforcements from their military, the democratic ideals of the town nevertheless overcome the threat of oppression from Lanser’s foreign military.
At the moment of Lanser’s conquest, Mayor Orden is described as saying, “I don’t know,” at several points during their initial discussion. The mayor hesitates to agree to cooperate or resist Lanser’s leadership until he can better understand the mindset of his people. Orden claims that “authority is in the town” when Lanser pressures him to cooperate (19). In this, Orden refuses to act on behalf of the town. Instead, he respects the town’s democratic ideals and postpones taking an overt action either against or in cooperation with Lanser. It is not until Alex Morden’s trial that Mayor Orden begins acting on behalf of the town, as Alex’s action against Captain Bentick made it clear to Order that the town wishes to revolt and reclaim their freedom (48).
Lanser insists that Alex must be executed according to the orders he has received from his superiors, demonstrating the strict authoritarianism that dictates his and his soldiers’ actions. Before the trial, Lanser says: “We do not act alone or on our own judgement” (47). Mayor Orden shares this belief in that he does not act unless it is through the town’s approval, but Lanser takes this idea to mean that he must follow the orders of his superiors. Though this demonstrates that both men value community and a sense of duty to one’s peers, they approach their morality from opposite perspectives.
By the conclusion of the novel, Lanser’s soldiers are worn down by the continued strength of the townspeople. Though each of the soldiers follows Lanser’s orders, they cannot combat the moral and emotional toll of occupying a town determined to reclaim its freedom. This allows the democratic ideals of the town to prevail over the authoritarianism of Lanser as demonstrated by Mayor Orden’s acceptance of his fate moments before his own execution. He and Doctor Winter find solace in the knowledge that the cause of freedom will continue after their deaths. Their deaths then embody the town’s democratic triumph over the authoritarianism of their occupiers.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By John Steinbeck