47 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Abelard and Heloise do not provide dates in their letters. The dates assigned by medieval chroniclers also vary. The Chronology is therefore essential for situating the reader in the general history of the time and place in which the letters occurred. It also helps to provide context such as Parisian, French, and church politics. The Chronology begins with vital dates related to the church. It notes that between 1073 and 1085, Pope Gregory VII made attempts to enforce celibacy among the clergy and to bolster ecclesiastic authority.
The Chronology also provides vital information regarding the main figures, Abelard and Heloise, such as their probable dates of birth (1079 C.E. and 1090-1100 C.E., respectively); their educations; their personal and professional interactions; the secular and religious intellectual debates in which they engaged; their scholarly works; their intellectual trajectories; their religious lives; and their deaths. The Chronology focuses more heavily on Abelard than it does on Heloise and the other minor, historical actors.
Betty Radice, the original translator and editor, writes an Introduction in which she addresses both the history and politics informing the work at large, as well as her scholarly interpretation of the relationship and letters between Abelard and Heloise. She discusses the 12th-century Renaissance in Paris, France, and parts of Western Europe that enabled the vibrant yet charged intellectual atmosphere in which Abelard and Heloise were steeped. Radice discusses the division and conflicts between secular and religious education in 12th-century France, the politics of the Catholic Church and the subject of heresy, social and cultural life in Paris, attitudes towards sex and marriage, and the lovers’ legacies.
M.T. Clanchy uses the Preface to introduce Betty Radice’s translation as a classic but also to note that he has made changes to some of the formatting, translation, and content. One of the primary changes is his addition of another introduction, titled, “The Letters of Abelard and Heloise in Today’s Scholarship.” In this addition, Clanchy places the work in the context of contemporary scholarship. He notes that, despite the fact that most scholars now accept that the letters are authentic and written by Abelard and Heloise, in the past there has been and remains some discussion over whether the letters could be forgeries produced by a single author. This stems from the fact that we only have their later copies, made around 1280 C.E. Clanchy also draws our attention to new debates over the letters, including a renewed focus on Heloise as an intellectual in her own right, and new letters attributed to the lovers, which could provide insight into their early relationship.
The introductory matter provides crucial context for understanding not only Heloise and Abelard and their changing relationship, but also for understanding the social, religious, and political undercurrents that informed their relationship and their lives. A number of these undercurrents stem from the popes in Rome, who held sway over the Catholic Church in France and made the ultimate decisions on issues such as heresy. This was especially important to Abelard’s intellectual life, given that he was embroiled in serious accusations of heresy and forced to burn his treatises. Throughout the work, these accusations reveal the tension and competition within the church in medieval France among various religious leaders, monks, teachers, and theologians.
A recurring theme is the interplay between secular and religious learning and teaching in 11th- and 12th-century France. Both Heloise and Abelard benefitted from a classical education and a higher education in the liberal arts, prior to taking religious vows. Abelard was ultimately accused of heresy on the basis of his classical education in logic and philosophy seeping into his theology. For this reason, Radice tells us that he is exemplary of the vibrant yet volatile intellectual ferment of the 12th-Century Renaissance and served as the forefather of medieval universities.
This context allows us to better understand Heloise and Abelard and their relationship, because as Clanchy states in his Introduction, the controversy surrounding both emerges out of how we choose to characterize them. We deduce the importance of considering the changing nature of their complex relationship in the context of their views on love, sex, and marriage. We also glean the importance of their social standing and notoriety, and their intellectual trajectories.
Lastly, we are reminded of how little we know of Abelard and Heloise as historical actors and how scholarly work continues in this regard, particularly on potential new letters attributed to both, and on Heloise as an individual and a scholar in her own right. Clanchy also reminds us that despite Abelard’s grandiose language, “his ‘world’ was in fact confined to Catholic or Romanesque Europe,” and that his knowledge of the wide world was limited (lviii-lix). In other words, this is one small piece of medieval World History that must be illuminated further and placed in its larger historical context.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: