47 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Abelard’s exhortation to Heloise to shed her bitterness toward God and see his punishment as an act of divine mercy and love must have had a profound effect on Heloise, because her response takes on an entirely new, more measured and reserved tone. After vowing to no longer write about her grief to him, she turns to more practical matters.
In her first letter to Abelard, Heloise remarks that he is more knowledgeable than her on the matter of the education of holy women. In this letter, she follows up and asks Abelard to instruct the Paraclete community on how the order of nuns began and “what authority there is for our profession” (94).
She elaborates that she and her nuns are in need of a Rule, a guide for their daily lives and activities as nuns. She notes that their predecessors had never written down a Rule suitable for women, but that this is necessary, given the numbers of women entering monasteries and the fact that women and men are fundamentally different in the burdens that they are able to shoulder.
Specifically, she asks about the ordering of psalms, whether the nuns should eat together with men, whether they should consume wine, whether they should fast, whether they should eat meat, and whether they should avoid contact with “women of the world” (95). On the subject of food, she opines that food may not actually commend us to God and that abstaining may not add anything to our merit. In other words, we should be more concerned with the inner man, rather than outward matters such as food, “and think more of our duty to him the less we put our trust in outward things” (108).
To justify and bolster her request for guidance and clarification, Heloise emphasizes that St. Benedict, the creator of the Benedictine Rule for monastic life, made modifications according to age and strength, and that canon law also takes into account differences between the sexes. She writes that, “It is clearly contrary to reason if burdens are imposed without previous investigation into the strength of those who bear them […]” (96). Rather than impose excessively heavy burdens on women and “our weak nature,” Heloise asks Abelard for some suitable, modified instructions (109).
In this letter, Abelard addresses Heloise’s first request for information on the origin of the order of nuns. He provides this to Heloise in the form of numerous examples of influential and favored women, from those among the early followers of Christ, to women in the Old Testament, to heroic women from classical antiquity. Abelard states that the orders of monks and nuns took “the form of its religion most fully from our Lord Jesus Christ,” but that the idea actually predated him (112), hence his numerous references to classical antiquity.
He begins by giving the example of two sisters who served Christ and of Mary Magdalene, who anointed Christ’s feet. He points out that while Christ rejected the earthly kingdoms offered to him by men, he welcomed being anointed by a woman. Furthermore, he writes that it was women who remained devoted to Christ when the apostles fled from him, and that they were the first to know of and rejoice in his resurrection. Abelard cites all of this to make the point that Christ commended and valued women and their devotion.
Abelard then delves into the origin of the profession, noting that various sources attest to the fact that nuns and monasteries were present from the very early days of the Church. He discusses the hymns composed and sung by women; Phebe as the first deaconess of the Church, who was commended by St Paul himself; the writings of St. John and St. Jerome, which addressed women with honor; and the great efforts made by holy men like St. Ambrose to teach holy women. He writes that, “Although women are the weaker sex, their virtue is more pleasing to God and more perfect” (118).
Abelard then goes back in time to “the very beginning of the world,” noting that women were created in paradise, whereas man was created outside of it, indicating the priority given to women (118). Through Mary, God rectified the root of all evil represented by Eve. He discusses how holy women existed among even the pagans, who honored and housed them in their temples and protected their chastity.
Abelard then gives a significant number of examples of influential and pious women who achieved great things, from Judith and Esther, to Elizabeth, to Sibyl, to the Gentile woman who conversed with Christ. Abelard reinforces that these women achieved great feats, from converting others, to prophesying the coming of Christ, to bringing about the resurrection of the dead. Overall, he writes, their profession is an excellent one and “in commendation of it special dignity” (129).
Abelard’s last letter to Heloise is a lengthy response to her second request for a Rule. He sets out to put together good practices, the testimony of Scripture, and the “abundant riches in the records of the Fathers,” in order to provide a worthy treatise (131). Abelard divides his treatise into three parts, which he sees as “the sum of monastic faith”: living a life of continence and pursuing chastity in body and spirit, living a life with no personal possessions and forsaking one’s earthly desires, and observing silence (131).
In regards to continence, Abelard writes that self-control and restraint is key and that we must be “ready with belts fastened” (131). On renouncing possessions, Abelard writes that we must be ready to forsake everything but Christ, because “an apostolic life […] reduces everything to a common store” (133). He devotes most time to the subject of silence, writing about how the tongue is an instrument of evil, how talking destroys religion, and how female talk is especially dangerous. For these reasons, he recommends withdrawing, holding people at a distance, and using signs instead of words, concluding that “[s]olitude is indeed all the more necessary for your woman’s frailty” (142).
The remainder of his letter is devoted to practical matters related to the monastery, such as the organization of leadership from the deaconess down. He notes that this organization must be similar to that of a regimented army. After detailing the role and responsibility of the deaconess and warning against abusing and reveling in her power, Abelard writes that monasteries and monks should reside near the convent in order to conduct their external affairs and provide governance. He subordinates the convent to the male religious authorities but empowers the abbess as “the queen” (157). Despite their proximity, he strongly states that there should be no contact between the monks and the nuns.
Abelard then delves into matters such as ornaments for the oratory, the singing of psalms, sleeping and waking hours, proper clothing, daily activities, proper education for the nuns, and food and drink. He devotes much time to explaining why excess consumption, as opposed to food itself, is sinful and forbidden, and why wine may be consumed only for ailments, noting that “[t]he use of meat and wine, like marriage, is considered to lie between good and evil” (187). He ends the letter by emphasizing that the nuns should be educated, particularly in Scripture, but that the focus must be on comprehension, rather than repetition.
As editor, Radice chose to group letters 6-8 together as “The Letters of Direction,” because rather than delving into their personal relationship and history, Abelard and Heloise write as abbot and abbess, discussing matters of their profession and guidelines for monastic life specific to women.
In her Introduction, Radice notes that we never find out whether Heloise was able to heal from the wounds she laments about, and whether she is able to reconcile with God. All that we can deduct from her letter is that she refrains from discussing these troubles with Abelard and instead asks him for professional help. It is through this request that we see Heloise in her role as devoted abbess most clearly, despite her inner turmoil.
It is clear from her exhortations that she finds the application of the Benedictine Rule for monastic life to women problematic, as it is designed for men. She emphasizes that while the nuns are not trying to shirk work, the prescribed workload is too heavy to bear and unsuitable, perhaps holding some people back from devoting themselves to God and matters of actual importance. Heloise shows her mastery of theology and Scripture by bolstering her case with as many texts as Abelard does in his own letters. The picture that emerges is one of a well-learned and astute scholar.
We can deduct from Abelard’s response that he believes fervently in the exalted status of pious and holy women. Through his numerous examples of heroines from classical antiquity, the Old Testament, the time of Christ, and the early Church, it’s clear that he has devoted some time to thinking on female piety, even outside of the context of the Catholic Church. Though he, like Heloise, is well-steeped in the medieval Christian understanding of gender and takes for granted that women are the weaker sex, he makes the case that this makes their piety even more worthy. Moreover, he ascribes great strength to particular heroines and praises women for their devotion to Christ, when others had failed Christ. We can deduce that Abelard truly believes in the honor, dignity, and worthiness of holy women.
Abelard’s final letter of direction to Heloise details at length a Rule for her community. The esteem with which he holds the community in particular but also the profession at large is clear. He writes that he aims “to adorn the spiritual temple to God which you are” (130). In his discussion of the importance of observing silence, we observe that Abelard views women on a sort of spectrum. Though he admires and praises holy women, he warns against female conversation as especially dangerous. Later, he rails against holy women who seek power and authority, rather than service. We perceive a balance, in which Abelard subordinates nuns to the male authority of the nearby monastery but insists that the abbot consult and not oppress the abbess, acting as a steward to her queen.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: