85 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The first “moment” or section of the play is titled “A Definition” and begins with the narrator explaining that, over the course of a year, the theatre company travelled to Laramie several times and conducted over two hundred interviews. These interviews, along with journal entries from members of the company and other found texts” (21), such as newspaper reports, provide the text of the play. This opening section also attempts to “define” or give a sense of Laramie as a place from the perspective of people who love it, including Detective Sergeant Hing and Eileen Engen. Laramie is a railway town, a place populated by ranchers as well as university students. The president of the university reveals that he has lived in a few big cities but loves Laramie; while he wouldn’t let his children play outside after dark, it stays bright until 11pm in the summer. We are also introduced to Rebecca Hilliker, head of the theatre department at the University of Wyoming, who is a key ally of the theatre company. The “moment” closes with an observation by Jedadiah Schultz, that “after Matthew” (24), Laramie was defined by the crime, that it became a “sign” (24) of everything that Matthew’s death symbolized, rather than a community.
The next moment is titled “Journal Entries” and shows the theatre company’s reactions to Kaufman’s proposal that they visit Laramie, interview residents, and produce a play. There is a sense of apprehension and even danger as they contemplate the task before them. Kaufman reveals that he has made contact with the theatre department at the University of Wyoming, and the next moment, titled “Rebecca Hilliker,” is from her perspective. At first, she was disturbed by the idea of the play, but then she remembered that they need to talk. However, she warns that the theatre company—and the audience—might not like what they have to say. She notes that the students here are very open, very honest and very redneck. She also advises Kaufman and his colleagues to speak to one particular student, Jedadiah Schultz.
“Angels in America” is the title of the next moment, in which Jedadiah states that he won a scholarship to study theatre with his performance in that seminal piece of LGBT theatre. He naturally invited his parents to the performance but, despite normally being supportive of his endeavors, they refused to attend because of the play’s homosexual themes. As a result, his parents did not witness the best moment of his life: he came first in the competition and won a scholarship to the University of Wyoming. He reflects on why he performed the piece even though his parents objected. He states that he is not gay and so was not invested in the material; he just wanted to win.
Jedadiah’s section is followed by another moment entitled “Journal Entries.” This brief section considers the company’s first impressions of Laramie. Many of their observations are commonplace but highlight the difference between life in a city and life in small-town Wyoming. Of particular interest to Barbara Pitts was a sign that read “HATE IS NOT A LARAMIE VALUE” (28).
These first five moments establish the parameters of the play. The narrator’s introduction explains how the play was devised and that the actor’s lines are taken from interviews with people who lived or worked in Laramie at the time of Matthew Shepard’s murder. This knowledge lends particular weight to the monologues; the company cannot be accused of fabricating a story or putting words in people’s mouths. At the same time, the juxtaposition of different people’s interviews creates a new context for them and allows the theatre company a certain degree of control over how they are received. The interviews with Rebecca Hilliker and Jedadiah Schultz offer a justification for using theatre to investigate the issues raised by Matthew Shepard’s murder. In particular, Jedadiah’s conflict with his parents over his role in Angels in America suggests that theatre is already established as a site of struggle for LGBTQ rights in America.
“A Definition” gives us our first experience of this concatenation of voices as interviews from a variety of Laramie residents are interspersed to give a sense of the town’s history and its current identity. The sense that Laramie is new territory for members of the theatre company, and not just as a result of Matthew’s murder, is conveyed through the two “Journal Entries.” Like the other “moments,” these consist of a variety of voices, rather than a complete journal entry by one individual. In this way, the play attempts to capture a multitude of perspectives that reflects the complexity of a society, rather than reducing Laramie to a town of homophobes. At the same time, given what was done to Matthew Shepard, the sign “HATE IS NOT A LARAMIE VALUE” strikes a discordant note and speaks to the concern of Laramie residents with perceptions of their town in the aftermath of this brutal crime.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: