50 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia engages with the ideals of the Enlightenment, an 18th-century Western intellectual movement that emphasized reason, science, and rationality as pathways to understanding and improving the human condition. The Enlightenment, also known as the Age of Reason, was characterized by a belief in the power of human reason to challenge tradition and authority and to promote progress through knowledge and intellectual discourse.
The Enlightenment prioritized empirical evidence and scientific inquiry over “superstition” and religious dogma. Instead, Enlightenment thinkers sought to apply scientific methods to the study of society and human behavior, leading to advancements in political theory, economics, and ethics. Thinkers of this period, such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Immanuel Kant, argued for the application of reason to all aspects of life, advocating for education, individual liberty, and the separation of church and state. The period saw the rise of the public sphere, where ideas could be debated openly in salons, coffeehouses, and through print culture, all of which fostered an environment where intellectual exchange could flourish.
In the novel, Johnson explores these Enlightenment ideals by portraying Prince Rasselas and his companions engaging in The Philosophical Exploration of Happiness and Its Attainability. Their journey reflects the Enlightenment belief in empirical observation and rational thought, as they investigate various lifestyles and philosophies in their travels. Through the characters’ encounters with diverse individuals—from the poor to the wealthy and from scholars to hermits—the narrative examines the merits and pitfalls of different ways of life, mirroring the period’s inclination toward critical analysis and intellectual debate.
However, the novel also questions the limitations of rational thought in securing personal happiness. Johnson illustrates that despite intellectual pursuits and rational deliberation, the characters continue to grapple with existential dissatisfaction and unfulfilled desires. The work thus highlights the tension between the Enlightenment’s optimism about human reason and what the novel suggests is the complex and often irrational nature of human emotions and aspirations. Thus, the novel serves as both a product of and a commentary on Enlightenment thought, encouraging consideration of the balance between rationality and the emotional intricacies of human life.
Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia belongs to the genre of the philosophical tale, a form of literature that uses narrative to explore and critique philosophical ideas. This genre is characterized by its didactic nature, as it aims to provoke thought or even impart lessons about fundamental human concerns through storytelling. In the mid-18th century, philosophical tales became a popular medium for engaging with Enlightenment ideas. These works often featured protagonists on journeys or adventures encountering characters and situations that illustrated different philosophical viewpoints and ethical dilemmas. Through these encounters, the narrative served as a platform for the author to critique prevailing social norms, philosophical doctrines, and human behaviors.
Johnson’s work shares significant similarities with Voltaire’s Candide (1759), another prominent example of the philosophical tale, which critiques philosophical optimism and examines the practical pursuit of happiness. Rasselas too questions the belief that everything happens for the best in this best of all possible worlds (the recurring refrain of the character Pangloss, whose perspective Candide skewers). In Rasselas, Johnson critiques the Enlightenment’s faith in reason and rationality as sufficient paths to happiness. The narrative questions whether any single lifestyle or philosophy can guarantee happiness while suggesting the futility of the relentless pursuit of happiness and the limitations of rational inquiry in providing ultimate answers. More broadly, both Johnson and Voltaire use their respective tales to highlight the dissonance between philosophical ideals and the realities of human existence, employing satire and irony to underscore the limitations of overly simplistic or optimistic worldviews.
The literary context of Rasselas is also informed by its place in 18th-century British literature, where it stands as a notable work within the tradition of moral and philosophical discourse. Johnson’s novel contributes to ongoing debates about the role of reason, the pursuit of knowledge, and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world. It offers a more introspective and less satirical approach compared to Candide, emphasizing contemplation and moral inquiry over sharp wit.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: