49 pages 1 hour read

The Great Trouble

Fiction | Novel | Middle Grade | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Class Division in Victorian London

Victorian London, as presented in The Great Trouble, is plagued by sharp class divisions that affect the material conditions and personal identities of the city’s inhabitants. The physical circumstances of these divisions are presented as the most immediate in the text. As the novel begins, Eel comments on the stink and filth of the Thames, which he wades through daily in his role as a mudlark. This dirty, arduous, and often unproductive labor is a sign of Eel’s extremely low social status. In correlation with Eel’s financial need and lack of prospects, he allows his work to subsume his identity and therefore thinks of himself not as someone who goes mudlarking, but as someone who is a mudlark. Because he allows himself to be defined by his work, this self-limiting mindset is detrimental to his well-being, for he sometimes refuses to seek out novel solutions on the assumption that they are simply inaccessible to someone of his social status.

This mindset becomes apparent when Hugzie accuses Eel of stealing from the Lion Brewery—a crime that Hugzie himself is guilty of committing. However, because Hugzie is the nephew of the Lion’s owners, he and Eel both know that Mr. John will believe Hugzie rather than Eel. Though Eel knows he is innocent, he does not believe that a mudlark like himself merits the attention of higher-class people who have the ability to help him. For example, when he considers asking Dr. Snow to vouch for his character, he ultimately decides against it, assuming that the great doctor would have no reason to help a lowly orphan. The novel therefore demonstrates that class differences endanger lower-class people by increasing their risk of physical dangers such as cholera outbreaks and by enculturing them to believe that they simply cannot access the help they need. As Eel’s reticence to enlist Dr. Snow’s aid implies, this social division threatens the self-confidence and inherent sense of value of lower-class people.

The arbitrariness of such distinctions is emphasized by the proximity between the homes of the poor and those of the middle and upper classes. When traveling to Dr. Snow’s house, Eel thinks, “Sackville Street felt like another world: quiet and peaceful, with just a few gentlemen and ladies out for an evening stroll. They don’t even know what’s happening less than a mile away, I thought” (82). Though the different classes of London inhabitants live adjacent to one another and well within Eel’s ability to walk between the two locations, the middle and upper classes experience privilege as a capacity for distance and ignorance. They do not know about the cholera outbreak because they do not need to know. As far as they are concerned, the unhygienic conditions of Broad Street will never spread to Sackville Street. Moreover, they do not wish to know, because the same societal logic and resultant internal voice that convince Eel of his inferiority causes those of higher social classes to believe that they are superior to those afflicted by the outbreak.

The Value of Cleverness and Education

For Eel, an impoverished orphan in Victorian London, education is his sole opportunity to pursue social advancement and bring about an improvement in his situation. The proof of this dynamic lies in Eel’s previous education and the chances it has afforded him despite his currently diminished circumstances. When Eel works at Lion Brewery in the beginning of the novel, he recalls that he obtained the job because Thumbless Jake advertised Eel as someone who could read and write: skills that were far from guaranteed for orphan children in Victorian London. Eel knows he is lucky to have such an opportunity, and he advertises his literacy whenever possible, often surprising the middle- or upper-class adults from whom he seeks employment.

The author uses the protagonist’s views to promote the value of education to young readers, for Eel thinks of education as something that transforms opportunities and improves the self as well. When Reverend Whitehead tells the boy that he was only able to attend school because his father was the headmaster, Eel finds it odd that “an educated man [like the reverend] would bother to talk to [him]” (72). From Eel’s limited perspective, the reverend is currently an elevated figure in society and therefore always has been, and Eel cannot quite conceive of the fact that the reverend was once, like Eel, an unlikely candidate for education. This scene therefore reflects yet another example of the boy’s misguided conviction that upper-class individuals should have no reason to care for a lowly orphan like himself. However, the boy does understand that education has the capacity to erase or at least mitigate the difficulties of the past and allow people to become better versions of themselves.

Despite his knowledge that education is a valuable asset, Eel does not use his earnings to fund his own education or advance his own situation. Instead, he funds his brother’s education, citing this responsibility as a necessity even when he lacks the money required to pay for Henry’s room and board. In Eel’s estimation, even the threat of Fisheye Bill’s search for Henry is secondary to the little boy’s education, for although Eel cautions his brother to be cautious when he travels to and from school, he never suggests that Henry should skip school to stay out of sight.

Because Eel has no extra money for his own education and no education to improve his earning potential, this vicious cycle could prevent Eel from achieving any form of upward social mobility. However, he possesses the cleverness, perseverance, and strength of will to make the most of his limited education and gradually advance to higher-paying jobs. Eel’s innate cleverness manifests in multiple ways as he helps Dr. Snow by making keen observations, thinking critically, and analyzing situations to make them work to his advantage. When he combines these skills with his honesty and his willingness to work hard, Eel seizes new opportunities and manages to keep them. This combination of qualities ultimately leads to his adoption by Mr. Edward at the novel’s conclusion, which presents Eel with a promising future: one that finally allows him to attend school.

The Importance of Community Collaboration

Dr. Snow’s theory that cholera is transmitted by water contrasts with the prevailing “miasma” theory of the time period, which mistakenly held that cholera was transmitted by bad air. This theory caused people to assume that bad smells, which were incredibly common in the poorer areas of Victorian London, indicated the potential presence of disease. When Dr. Snow first recruits Eel to help detect the source of the outbreak, interview the afflicted, and warn them about the Broad Street water pump, he cautions Eel that residents will be unlikely to act on Eel’s warnings. However, the text shows the opposite to be true; many of the Golden Square residents are willing to heed Eel’s suggestion to avoid the Broad Street pump even if they doubt his logic, for they will embrace any idea that might lessen the incidence of cholera in their community.

This community-minded approach recurs throughout the novel as Florrie nurses the ailing Griggs family despite her belief that she can contract cholera by breathing the same air. Likewise, Mrs. Lewis willingly tells Dr. Snow about the timeline of cholera infection in her family even though she has recently lost her baby and her husband to the disease. The Golden Square residents also come together to agree that the water pump handle be removed, and when the time is right, they rally together to have it replaced. By the end of the novel, the residents of Golden Square prove themselves willing to work together and help one another in the face of a crisis, even when that work carries the risk of personal harm.

The novel also indicates that this mindset is partially class-based, and upper-class individuals are often portrayed as being both ignorant and uncaring of the plights of the poor. For example, Eel has been so frequently treated with open disdain by those with more social power that he expects to be dismissed even when he has good reason to make his knowledge and presence known. Unlike the intermingled families who cohabitate on Broad Street, the single-family homes of the upper classes contributes to their relative isolation from (and indifference to) those who endure poor conditions nearby. However, Deborah Hopkinson also avoids valorizing poverty itself by introducing characters such as Fisheye Bill and Nasty Ned, who share Eel’s poverty but are more concerned with helping themselves than with improving the community. Fisheye and Ned each seek personal gain through the exploitation of others, and although Ned eventually regrets giving Eel over to his violent stepfather, the underlying motivation for his remorse is equally self-serving, for he merely fears that Eel will die in Fisheye’s custody and will then return as a ghost to haunt Ned in a quest for vengeance. The novel thus implies that although the upper classes struggle to engage in community collaboration, the lower classes are not inherently community-minded. Instead, the residents of Golden Square make a conscious choice to care for those beyond their immediate families, demonstrating a measure of kindness, pragmatism, and intelligence that their so-called “social betters” believe them to lack.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 49 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools