69 pages 2 hours read

The Great Believers

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Chosen Family

Several of the characters in The Great Believers find a deeper familial connection with friends—their chosen family—than their biological family. These chosen family dynamics highlight the ways in which shared ideas, experiences, and desires often link people more strongly than (coincidentally) shared genetics. Throughout the novel, chosen family relationships also highlight specific elements that are missing from—or need to be repaired within—characters’ biological families.

The novel significantly opens with the life celebration Fiona, Richard, Terrence, Yale, Charlie, Teddy, Asher, and Julian are holding for Nico (in place of the funeral his parents have arranged for him). This gathering of friends reflects the desires Nico articulated before he died—to have a “party” instead of a somber funeral—whereas his parents’ funeral reflects their desire to make the socially appropriate gesture: To make their son appear respectable (and less gay). This gathering embodies the dissonance gay men often experience with family members who don’t accept their sexuality (and ultimately fortifies Fiona’s commitment to ensure that the legacies and wishes of Nico’s friends are upheld).

Throughout the novel, Makkai also highlights the complex ideological variations and disagreements between members of the gay community. Charlie and Asher often argue about the efficacy of AIDS testing, the ethical superiority of monogamy versus open relationships, and the obligation to participate in gay rights activism. Staff members of Charlie’s publication argue about the need for different kinds of representation and inclusion (such as photos of queer women). The message sent by these conflicts is that discourse, debate, and even disagreement are a vital aspect of chosen families. Rather than separate members of chosen family groups, challenging conversations seem to bring them closer together.

For Yale, this sensation of togetherness is especially important, because he does not have a close relationship with his biological family. Yale’s father only calls a few times a year for perfunctory conversations (wherein he is notably uneasy about addressing his son’s queer identity). Yale’s mother left his family to become an actress when he was an adolescent, and he only sees her on television (ironically, often in the role of a “caring mother”). Yale’s connections with his gay friends—and the loving support system he gains through Charlie’s mother, Teresa—serve as a replacement for his biological family. Thus, when Yale and Charlie break up, Yale is most devastated by the possibility of losing his chosen family (and thus going through the physical and emotional devastation of AIDS without a support system).

Allies such as Fiona, Cecily, the Sharps, and even Dr. Cheng can also be seen as extensions of Yale’s chosen family. Fiona’s narrative, however, highlights the complex internal struggles of allies who can’t fulfill all the needs of those they love. Fiona’s commitment to make herself constantly available for Yale leads to a deeply consuming long-term guilt (when he dies the day her daughter, Claire, is born). This guilt distracts Fiona from Claire, and arguably leads Claire to seek out her own chosen family: A conservative Christian cult that embodies the opposite values of her mother’s chosen family.

Shame and Survivor’s Guilt

In The Great Believers, the emotions of shame and survivor’s guilt are closely entwined, and characters process these emotions simultaneously. When Yale learns that Charlie has been infected with AIDS (and possibly infected him) as a result of his secretive sexual encounters with anonymous men, he is not only tasked with forgiving Charlie’s indiscretion, but forgiving Charlie’s shame. Eventually, Yale realizes that Charlie’s righteous political image—ranting about “commuter gays” and safe sex—was a mask for his deep, private shame about being gay himself. When Yale initially tests negative for HIV—and feels he has escaped death—he contends with his own complicated feelings of shame and survivor’s guilt, wondering, “why me?”.

After Yale becomes infected with AIDS (from having sex with Roman), he better understands the societal pressures that intensified Charlie’s shame. During a gay rights protest Yale participates in with Fiona, he tells her that monogamy—and the shame attached to anonymous sex—is the whole reason he is sick. On one level, Yale sees that Charlie’s inability to preserve their monogamy—and the shame Charlie felt about this inability—led him to irresponsible, secretive sex with strangers (whereas if they’d been in an open relationship, they could’ve made honest compromises about seeing other partners). On another level, Yale recognizes that his assumptions about Roman’s sexual behavior and presumed monogamy (based on his superficial appearance and self-presentation) led him to unwittingly engage in unsafe sex (which ultimately led to AIDS). These realizations significantly challenge conservative narratives about the “reasons” AIDS was spread among gay men: The belief that the virus was spread by sex with multiple partners, and that sexual abstinence was the only way to preserve safety. Yale recognizes that contrary to these narratives, the elevation of abstinence and monogamy only leads to shame, secrecy, and irresponsible behavior.

When Yale finally goes to see Charlie on his death bed—in the same hospital where he himself will die—he is able to let go of his own guilt and shame. Facing his mortality allows him to appreciate the life he has left (while he still has it) and the connections he has within his life.

Likewise, Fiona comes to terms with her own shame (over being a less-than-adequate mother to Claire) and survivor’s guilt (about out-living all of her gay friends) simultaneously. The novel reveals that Fiona’s shame is deeply connected to survivor’s guilt by the events surrounding Claire’s birth. Claire was born on the day Yale died; thus, Claire’s birth has always been surrounded by feelings of guilt (that Fiona lived, that she couldn’t be there for Yale, and that Yale died “alone”). Fiona processes her guilt and shame by tracking down Claire in Paris, by learning to communicate with her daughter as an autonomous adult with her own life (rather than a symbol of someone else’s death). Fiona also processes her guilt and shame with the help of Julian, who similarly survived past all of his friends (despite his questions of “why me?”). 

Though The Great Believers’ thematic deconstructions of guilt and shame can be read several different ways, the prevailing message is perhaps best summarized by Julian’s advice for Fiona and Claire near the book’s end:

If we could just be on earth at the same place and same time as everyone we loved, if we could be born together and die together, it would be so simple. And it’s not. But listen: You two are on the planet at the same time. You’re in the same place now. That’s a miracle (401).

With these words, Fiona feels a sense of purpose in Julian’s survival—in the reality that they are all “in the same place now.” Just as Yale learned to appreciate life at Charlie’s deathbed, Fiona learns to let go of Yale’s death (and appreciate the present moment she and her daughter are living in). 

Interconnectedness and Repeating History

The thematic connections between Yale’s generation (of young men dying from AIDS) and Nora’s generation (of young artists dying in World War I) are the foundation of The Great Believers and its title. The novel opens with a quote from F. Scott Fitzgerald that reads, “We were the great believers. I have never cared for any men as much as for these who felt the first springs when I did, and saw death ahead, and were reprieved—and who now walk the long snowy summer.” This quote—which refers to Nora’s “Lost Generation”—suggests the ways in which Paris served as a haven for survivors who “saw death ahead.” Likewise, Yale’s generation of gay men sought a kind of creative asylum in the city of Chicago (and communed over their shared suffering with AIDS). In both Nora’s generation and Yale’s generation, survivors felt a sense of profound confusion and disorientation, exemplified by “the long snowy summer.” The contradictory images of “snow” and “summer” suggest the experience of a survival that feels impossible: as horrific as it is beautiful.

The novel illustrates the overlaps between Nora and Yale’s generations with several symbolic connections. Yale bemoans the fact that he’s “thirty-one and all his friends are dying” (106), just as Nora’s reflects, “All my friends are dying, or they’re dead already, but I’ve been through it before” (252). Though Nora herself dies before Yale can fulfill his dream of pushing her through the gallery in her wheelchair, he himself is pushed through the gallery in a wheelchair, effectively taking Nora’s place. Nora and Yale also significantly die of the same condition: congestive heart failure.

The Great Believers also develops several connections between Nora and Fiona that suggest history repeating itself (even as situations and contexts change). After Fiona injures her hand (cutting it on a champagne glass as she drunkenly grieves her friends who died of AIDS), the text reveals that Nora’s lifelong lover, Ranko Novak, lost use of his painting hand in World War I. Nora explains that she painted Ranko’s self-portrait that appears in her collection (because he was no longer able to use his own hands). This self-portrait serves as a complex symbol of Nora’s love for Ranko, her longing to preserve his memory, and the self-sacrifice involved in preserving his memory. For Fiona, Nora’s self-sacrificing gesture invites questions of her own self-sacrificing care for her gay friends (and devotion to their memories, even 30 years later). As Nora summarizes: “[…] when someone’s gone and you’re the primary keeper of his memory—letting go would be a kind of murder, wouldn’t it?” (312).

Fiona’s return to Paris—the city wherein Nora lived throughout the 1920s—further affirms the novel’s interest in historic repetition. It’s significant that Fiona comes to Paris searching for Claire, who is effectively repeating her mother’s rebellious actions by fleeing from her parents. Claire’s love of painting, drawing, and film can also be read as a mirroring of Nora’s similarly artistic nature. Her family’s return to Paris after three generations can be read as a fitting fulfillment of Nora’s artistic legacy, a way of coming full circle.

Finally, the novel solidifies the sensation of coming full circle with references to reincarnation. After Fiona reveals that Claire was born the day Yale died, Claire wishes she could’ve been Yale’s reincarnation (and absolved her mother of the guilt she feels attached to his death). The novel also insinuates that Nicolette is a kind of symbolic reincarnation of Nico (with her sound-alike name and look-alike blonde curls). With these repetitions, The Great Believers suggests an uncanny survival: a “long snowy summer” of loved ones’ traits, dreams, and desires that lives on long after they’ve died. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 69 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools