45 pages 1 hour read

The Dinner

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2009

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3: “Main Course”

Chapters 16-21 Summary

The next course arrives and the floor manager—once again—gives the diners a lengthy explanation of their choices. Paul recognizes his brother’s hunger and asks the floor manager questions about the food, forcing Serge to wait a little longer. Babette and Claire have not returned. When Paul asks yet another question, Serge’s face “radiated impatience” (55). As soon as the floor manager leaves, Serge begins to eat. Paul goes to find Babette and Claire.

 

Paul first checks the women’s bathroom but they are not inside. Paul searches outside and watches through the window as Serge finishes his meal. The bearded man and his daughter give Serge a nod of appreciation as they exit; Serge had been the “very picture of courtesy” (56) when the man had asked for the photograph. Serge had posed with the young girl and Paul had noticed the tell-tale (almost imperceptible) signs of irritation on his brother’s face. In that moment, Paul had felt a modicum of pity for his brother, who is having his private life interrupted by his public persona. Paul even imagined that he might help Serge respond violently, if it came to that. Paul is constantly surprised by the manner in which his lumpen, boorish brother can transform into a charismatic politician when required. Faced with the dilemma, Serge faked a phone call and excused himself. Sat at the table, Paul felt compelled to act as his brother’s receptionist, hinting that the bearded man and his daughter should leave. When they had done so, Serge sat back down. But before he could turn once again to serious matters, the main course had arrived.

 

Standing outside, Paul hears a cellphone ring. Quickly, he realizes that it is Michel’s cellphone that he accidently slipped into his own pocket. He sees Claire’s face on the screen; she is calling him. Paul answers. But rather than Claire, Michel is on the line. Unable to find his phone, he called from the house line. Paul apologizes, blaming a “senior moment” (62). Though Paul says that he and Claire will not be out late, Michel cannot wait. Paul worries that he is taking the wrong tone. Michel announces that he will come and collect the phone immediately. Paul swears, and then sees Claire and Babette, the former with her arm around the latter. A quick look at Claire tells him that the situation is bad. Paul announces that the main course has arrived.

 

Paul locks himself in a stall in the empty bathroom. He begins to search through Michel’s phone. He sees two missed calls from Beau, who Michel and Rick have nicknamed Faso. Though Serge had been wary of the nickname, Beau waved away his concerns. He “wanted to be like everyone” (64) and everyone had a nickname. Again, Paul looks through the videos. Again, he watches the video which changed his life. He recognizes the setting: an above ground subway station in the suburbs. The video shows Rick slapping a homeless person while Michel films. They try to make the man say the word “jackass.” When he finally does, the video ends. Reluctantly, Paul returns to the restaurant.

 

Paul does not return to the table, however. He hopes to intercept Michel so as to avoid awkward questions. Exiting the restaurant, Paul retraces his route. The darkness, he notes, has an advantage: unable to see one another’s eyes, “Michel might be more willing to speak the truth” (67). But Paul does not know what he will do with this truth. Paul suddenly decides to listen to the voicemail on the phone and read the unread text messages. He hears Beau’s voice, with the affectation of an American accent which annoys Paul. Babette has always been fiercely protective of her adopted son; Claire once called him racist for admitting that he did not like Beau. When he defended himself, she told him that she was kidding. Paul sees Michel approaching on a bicycle. The boy’s silhouette brings to his mind the word “predator,” which he quickly changes to athlete or sportsman. Still listening to the voicemail messages, Paul turns back toward the restaurant. He hears the bike ride across the gravel path behind him. Michel cycles past him as Claire’s voice comes through the phone speaker. She tells Michel that she and Paul will be at the restaurant until late, so “you two have to do it tonight” (69). She finishes by saying that Paul knows nothing about this and she hopes to keep it that way. Paul shouts out to his son as Michel approaches the restaurant; Claire’s words still ringing in his ear. They meet at the top of the path, where it is well-lit. When Michel asks who Paul was talking to on the phone, Paul detects the urgency in his son’s voice. Paul says that he was trying to call Michel and was confused as to why it was not working.

 

Paul states the facts about what happened. Two months ago, three boys (Michel, Rick, and Beau) returned home late from a party. After drinking alcohol and dancing with girls all night, they stop for one last beer on the way home to Serge and Babette’s house. They are well within their agreed-upon curfew. They stop so Michel can use an ATM. He exits quickly, revealing to his cousins that there is a homeless man sleeping inside. All three were disgusted by the smell but they dispute the exact details of what happened next. Though Beau suggests finding another ATM, the other two are disgusted by the homeless man but are determined to withdraw cash. Beau leaves on his bike. Rick and Michel enter the lobby containing the ATM. They wake the sleeping man and try to encourage him to leave. The man wakes and swears at the boys. They quickly realize that the homeless man is, in fact, a woman. The two boys seem to agree that it is time to leave but the woman shouts aggressively at them. Michel responds badly, kicking her sleeping bag. He slips and falls, his foot kicking the woman in the face, causing her to bleed. As the woman shouts louder and louder, Rick drags Michel outside. Together, they cannot help but laugh.

 

Michela nd Rick fall around laughing, mocking the woman. They find an old office chair left out for the trash collection and take it toward the ATM, throwing it through the open door onto the woman. They throw bags of trash at her. They throw a lamp. The woman stops screaming. They call her a “stupid whore” (74) and tell her to get a job. They find an empty jerry can and throw it at the woman’s head, just missing their target. At a later date, the CCTV footage shown on the national television show will show that the boys exit the lobby after throwing the jerry can. Paul remembers seeing the footage for the first time with Claire. He remembers his outrage at the event and how viewing the footage gave the heinous act a human dimension. He remembers how the boys laughed while they assaulted the woman. It was clear that the boys were enjoying themselves, that they were upper-middle class and white. The boys were eerily familiar. Paul remembers the moment he knew that it was Michel on the television. But he will not go into technicalities as the police investigation is still ongoing. Finally, the camera footage shows the boys returning with a lighter or a match. They throw it inside and everything catches fire. The homeless woman dies, killed by the explosion from the vapors of the empty jerry can. Paul turns to Claire, expecting her to share his horror and realization. She asks him whether he would like more wine. 

Chapters 22-28 Summary

With his hands in his pockets, Michel asks Paul about Claire. Paul cannot stop thinking about the secret Claire and Michel are keeping from him. He returns Michel’s phone. Michel knows that his father has looked at the phone; Paul decides that he will “act the ignoramus, a naïve father who didn’t think it was such a big deal that his son beat up vagrants and set fire to the homeless” (77). He admits to seeing the video of the homeless man. Michel asks whether Claire knows. Paul thinks about the night he saw the video on the television, when he had gone to Michel’s room and they had talked about what had happened. Michel had pleaded innocence, asking how he and Rick were to know that the gas vapors would explode. Paul had awkwardly listened to his son, not asking many questions. He had already made up his mind. Once, after Michel and his friends had broken a window with a soccer ball, Paul had taken Michel to pay the owner of the window. But when the man launched into a tirade about “the riffraff” (79), Paul had launched into a vehement defense of his son. He threatened the man and, when the man backed off, Paul calmly paid for the window. On the way home, Michel had cried, wanting his mother. Paul had offered not to mention any of what had happened to Claire. Michel agreed to keep everything a secret, the broken window and Paul’s threats. That night, as Paul prepared never to mention the incident again, Michel had hugged him tighter than ever before.

 

The evening Paul had talked to Michel about the dead homeless woman, he had tried to put himself in his sons shoes. He had tried to imagine what he might have done in Michel’s situation. He had told Michel to “just forget it for the time being” (82). Paul saw both fear and thankfulness in his son’s eyes.

 

Outside the restaurant, Paul and Michel silently stand opposite one another. Paul asks for an explanation about the video, but Michel says it does not make a difference. Paul imagines a world where he is a good father, one who disputes this. But he knows that he has already crossed that line. Michel begins to leave. A few days before, Serge had called to arrange the dinner. Paul immediately knew why. Paul asked whether Babette knew (she did), but Serge did not ask the same about Claire. Since then, Paul has watched the CCTV footage numerous times. He cannot get it out of his head. He calls after Michel. On one of his repeat viewings, Paul realized that the boys had returned to the scene of the crime to “see with their own eyes what they had done” (85), but the video cut there, leaving the next part of the event unseen. In the days after the broadcast, Paul had hoped for a war or a terrorist attack, something to push the murder out of the headlines. He had imagined being able to move on, maybe after six months or a year, and pretend that the attack never happened. He had studied Claire for any change in her behavior, any hint that she knew. He had wanted to start forgetting as soon as possible.

 

Paul had planned to forget but he could not do so. He had begun to scour the internet for more footage from the murder. He viewed the murder on YouTube but almost every video edited out the final shot, in which a white tennis shoe appears, suggesting that the boys returned to the scene of the crime. The final video focused on the attackers, slowing down the footage and adding ominous music whenever the boys were in frame. It was titled Men in Black III. Near the end, the video seemed to fade to black. Paul almost stopped watching but something compelled him to remain focused. The video changed; no longer CCTV, it became a video recorded on a cell phone camera. Paul heard the voices of his son and nephew as they recorded the aftermath. They joke with one another. Rick says Michel’s name. The image freezes and text appears on the screen, advertising a sequel which they will release soon. Each day, Paul had checked YouTube for the sequel. It was only that evening, as he checked Michel’s phone before leaving for the restaurant, that he had seen the rest of the video.

 

Paul calls after Michel, who turns around. Paul tells his son to delete the videos; he had seen for himself how Michel bullied Rick and pushed him around, an accusation Serge had levelled at Michel before. Paul knows that Michel is the leader of the two boys and takes some small satisfaction from this. Paul tells Michel to throw his phone in the river, offering to buy him a new one. He tells Michel to think about his future and, his voice filling with anger, demands to know why Michel made the YouTube video. Michel denies doing so, but loud people leaving the restaurant interrupt their conversation. When Paul presses the issue, Michel responds angrily. He tells Paul to shut up, and Paul sees hatred in his son’s eyes. Paul relents, worried that his son’s rejection will break his heart. He tells Michel about the missed call and the message from Faso, and Michel’s expression hardens. Michel, trying to sound casual, asks what he wanted. Eventually, he admits that it was Faso who put the footage on YouTube.

 

Paul and Michel stare at one another in silence. Paul thinks that he sees a moistness in his sons eyes, a look which asks, “you finally get it?” (94). The ringing of Paul’s phone interrupts the silence. It is Claire. He answers, gesturing for Michel to stay. Paul admits to Claire that he is outside with Michel. Before he can stop her, she announces that she is coming out to meet them. In that moment, Paul thinks about the secret she and Michel have been keeping from him and wonders whether they can still be a happy family. Paul asks Michel how Faso got a hold of the video. He “just did” (95), Michel responds. Now, Michel reveals, Faso is threatening to release the other videos if Michel and Rick do not pay him. Paul asks how much; €3,000, Michel says, as Faso wants to buy a moped.

 

Claire arrives and Michel hugs her. She comforts her son and glances at Paul, seemingly wondering how much he knows. Almost everything, Paul thinks. But Michel’s eyes tell him that Claire does not know about the videos. Paul concocts an excuse about paying Michel money—Claire’s eyebrows raise—and he hands Michel €50. They both hug Michel and he cycles away. Claire admits that she knew about what Michel and Rick did, that Michel phoned her on the night that it happened and asked her what to do.

Chapters 29-35 Summary

Paul remembers a time when he was teaching a class about Stalingrad. Teaching had become a drain on him and, after taking a short holiday alone in Berlin, he realized that he should retire.

 

After returning from Berlin, Paul’s attitude to the job changed. After students complained, Paul receives a summons from the principal’s office, where the principal asked Paul whether he said of the victims of World War II that “they only had themselves to blame for being victims” (101). Paul denies this, pointing out that—among any population of people—there are those who are nice and kind and those who are not. The principal realized that Paul had lost his enthusiasm for teaching. Paul expanded on the parts of history which had always interested him and how he had tried to convey that interest to the students. But the principal referred to an essay by a student whose name Paul has forgotten, one which Paul judged particularly harshly. Paul realized, then and there, that he was being let go. The principal asked Paul about his home life, getting many details wrong. Paul decided not to act out his violent fantasy of beating the man to a pulp for the sake of the (then four-years-old) Michel. The principal recommended that Paul meet with the school psychologist and take a short break from teaching. Paul agreed to the suggestions and left.

 

He visits the school psychologist a few days later. He accepts the medication prescribed and tells almost everything to Claire. The therapist tells him about a condition with a German-sounding name, which is hard to detect and might also affect his family members. Paul thinks of his son and projects the condition on to Michel’s behavior. Caught up in his thoughts, Paul does not answer the therapist’s question about whether he has children and—without thinking—agrees with the man’s suggestion that he was merely thinking about having children. It was not technically a lie; though Michel’s birth had been difficult, Paul and Claire had begun to discuss another child more and more. They were considering having children, but Paul left out the fact that they already had Michel. He inquires more about the condition, whether it might prompt expectant parents to terminate a pregnancy. The therapist says that it is a gray area. Many parents decide to get the abortion. Paul says what both men are thinking: If the test had been available 40 years ago, Paul would not be alive.

 

Paul takes the prescribed medicine and—at first—feels no different. Claire is more attentive to his well-being, however, and tells her that he feels fine. When the medication begins to take effect, Paul is reading a newspaper on his couch. Normally, such a situation would prompt dread-inducing existential thoughts. But on this occasion, he finds himself laughing. Claire, bemused, remarks that he seems like “one of those born-again Christians […] one big lump of happiness” (112). Paul almost tells her that he was thinking about a second child but instead begins to talk about building a shed in the garden.

 

That Sunday, Paul thinks, was “the high point” (113). The novelty of the medicine quickly fades and he tires of living life without the peaks and troughs. A few weeks later, he mentions to Claire his thought of having another child. She thinks it is a bad idea. Rather than ask her whether Michel might have inherited his condition, Paul changes the subject.

 

After that, Claire became ill. She was not typically a person who fell sick but nevertheless ended up in hospital. Paul will not reveal her illness—it is a private matter—but it was serious without being (at this particular stage) life-threatening. A series of operations seemed to worsen her condition. Claire weakened and Paul struggled to explain everything to Michel. He stays with a neighbor while Paul visits Claire. In the evenings, when Paul sits alone, he experiences a feeling of “extreme lightness” (116). Paul is desperate to maintain the appearance of normalcy. He does not want Michel to panic.

 

Serge and Babette visit the night before another of Claire’s surgeries, just as Paul and Michel are about to eat their dinner in front of the television. Paul still remembers the look on Babette’s face which made him “feel as though [he] had something to explain” (117). Paul mutters a reply and Michel leaps up and hugs Babette; Paul sees the room from her perspective, noting how messy it has become. There is little he can do but shrug. Babette and Serge tell Paul that they understand how difficult the situation must be for him. They offer to take Michel into their home for a short while. As they press the issue, he becomes offended. He begins to count how often they are using his first name. He asks them to leave and begins to fret, worried that he is not doing the right thing. Then, he asks whether they have talked to Claire recently. Babette admits that she has. Paul realizes that the idea has come from Claire herself and that all of his protests are futile. Babette asks why Michel never visits Claire in the hospital; Claire is worried that her son has forgotten his mother. Paul is about to say that Michel is always talking about his mother but then realizes that it is not true. When asked whether he would like to visit Claire, Michel only replies maybe. The boy is four years old, Paul says, maybe he knows what is best for himself. At that moment, Paul smells the food burning on the stove. He runs to the kitchen. He tries not to cry. He grabs the burning hot pan, ignoring the pain in his skin, and throws it at Serge’s head. Serge tries to duck but the pan catches him. Paul follows it up with another blow. Babette screams. Before Paul can hit his brother again, Michel appears. Paul stops. 

Part 3 Analysis

In this section of the novel, many truths come to light. Though Paul’s perspective informs the narrative (very biased and subjective), it contains a number of undeniable truths. These come from objective materials (such as video recordings) or from other characters (such as comments made by Michel and Claire). As a result, the middle section of the novel establishes a number of fundamental truths about the novel and provides a great deal of exposition.

 

The structure of the novel works effectively to reflect this slow drip, drip, drip of information. Koch names the first two parts “Aperitif” and “Appetizer,” a suggestion that they only provide a taste of what is to come. As such, the true nature of what Michel has done (and the reason why they organized the dinner) remains hidden. The reason—the brutal murder of a homeless woman by Rick and Michel—pops up in the main course. This is the bulk of expository information, the action which defines and influences every other choice in the novel. Though hinted at, through scenes of suggested violence and conflict earlier in the text, the stark reality of the attack still leaves a big impression on the audience. Just as with the main course of a meal, it satiates the reader’s appetite for information.

 

But in addition to revealing the truth about what Michel has done, this section of the novel delves deeper into the conspiracies and secrets. Paul, Claire, and Michel seem to keep information from one another. Paul believes that he is the only person who knows what Michel has done. Claire thought exactly the same about Paul. Michel kept the secret with both parents, manipulating each in order to ensure that his secret remained hidden. These conspiracies and secrets fuel emotions in the narrative. Paul finds himself jealous of the close relationship between Claire and Michel. He focuses on the pronouns Claire uses when talking about the boy, assuming that every time that she describes Michel as “my son” rather than “our son,” it is somehow a slight against Paul. This jealousy festers: Paul is unaware that Claire is harboring the same secret about Michel that preoccupies his own thoughts. He becomes increasingly suspicious of both his wife and son until the truth comes out. When this happens, it comes as something of a relief to Paul. He is happy that they share a secret together, that they are part of the same conspiracy. By the end of the main course, the family unit is closer due to the terrible secret that it shares.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 45 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools