50 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Richard Steele’s purpose in writing The Conscious Lovers was to depict morality in the theater, which, in turn, would promote better morals in society. Dramaturgically, there are several issues with this premise. One such is that while Steele promotes straight dealing and truthfulness, Steele’s plot rests on ostensibly moral characters such as Bevil Jr. and Myrtle practicing deception and manipulation, and but nevertheless being rewarded at the play’s end. These plot elements, particularly Myrtle’s various disguises, were a standard trope in the comedies of Steele’s time; his reliance on such theatrical clichés undercuts to some degree his proclaimed desire to move theater in another direction.
The most muddled character with regard to honesty and integrity is Bevil Jr., meant to be the play’s most morally upright character. Bevil Jr. is a servant of two masters: filial duty and honorable love. In trying to remain obedient to his father while also supporting Indiana, he commits many lies of omission. Though Steele wants Bevil Jr. to be honest, witty, and loyal, the character’s actions belie his honesty.
When Sir Bevil doubts that Bevil Jr. will marry Lucinda, Bevil Jr. asks, “Did I ever disobey any command of yours, sir?”, further specifying, “As I am ever prepared to marry if you bid me, so I am ready to let it alone if you will have me” (334). In the initial question, Bevil Jr. reframes the issue of his integrity by deflecting agency onto his father; Sir Bevil thus becomes responsible for the outcome of this conflict. Then, by leaving the decision of marriage to Sir Bevil, Bevil Jr. represses his feelings to comply with his father. Bevil Jr.’s behavior is meant to be honorably selfless, but Bevil Jr.’s apathetic acquiescence is more manipulative than honest. Bevil Jr. does not reveal his infatuation with Indiana, and only meekly agrees to do whatever his father will. In response, Sir Bevil grows worried that by forcing his son to marry Lucinda, he will be consigning him to misery—this is not really true commitment to filial obligation.
The play equates repressing one’s feelings with not having them; it disregards inner life for external adherence to correct behavior. When Humphrey questions Bevil Jr. about Indiana, Bevil Jr. denies any wrongdoing since he’s never told Indiana he loved her. When Indiana explains her relationship with Bevil Jr. to Sealand, she repeats this claim: “’Twas my own hope, my own passion that deluded me. He never made one amorous advance to me” (377). Bevil Jr.’s outward integrity remains, as he has not technically betrayed his father or Indiana. However, he has not been honest with either, and both have suffered as a result. In her explanation, Indiana is in tears, convinced that Bevil Jr. does not love her, as per his lack of “amorous advances.” Bevil Jr.’s half-honesty is only repaired when the play ends, with all secrets in the open.
Changing marriage dynamics of the 18th century led to a greater emphasis on romance and love in marriage, with different consequences across different socio-economic classes. The beginning of the Georgian period saw the rising influence on economic and social affairs of the merchant class—wealthy tradesmen who were neither nobility nor landowners. Alongside his lower- and upper-class characters, Steele portrays the prominent merchant elite via the Sealand family. Sir Bevil, Bevil Jr., Myrtle, and Cimberton are nobility by birth; Tom, Phillis, Humphrey, and Daniel are members of the lower classes. Meanwhile, Mr. and Mrs. Sealand, Indiana, and Lucinda exist somewhere in between, more ambiguously positioned in the hierarchy. Unlike the social elite, who had the most agency in marriage prospects, or the lower classes, whose prospects were hampered by poverty, the Sealand family must balance their desire for social mobility with their sense of the newfound worth.
When Sir Bevil meets with Sealand to discuss Lucinda and Bevil Jr.’s marriage, he notes: “Genealogy and descent are to be of some consideration in an affair of this sort,” distinguishing the upper and middle classes by adding: “Sir, I can’t help saying that what might injure a citizen’s credit may be no stain to a gentleman’s honor” (365). Sir Bevil’s implication is that an aristocrat like himself may not want to marry someone from a less noble family, since it would impact the family’s social standing. However, he points out that the members of the upper class are less easily damaged by socially unequal marriages than those in the comparatively new middle class—the former come from “an ancient house” (365), a phrase that suggests the durability of reputation and status, while the latter are imitating the manners and affect of their betters. In response, Sealand defensively quips that nobles are only pleasant “because you are generally bred up to be lazy, therefore, I warrant you, industry is dishonorable” (366), explicitly broaching the contrasting values of inherited wealth and earned income. The discussion reveals how the upper class, though controlling most social arrangements, could lose ground to the more industrious merchant class.
Scholars often note that marriage was consistently free to be based on love matches among the lower classes; despite lacking certain forms of socio-economic autonomy, members of these classes were also removed from the valuation and reputational concerns involved in arranged marriage. Tom and Phillis, for example, can carry out their affair without shame or secrecy, and Lucinda even expresses envy over their passionate kiss. However, while Tom and Phillis have fewer limitations on sexual self-expression, they are nevertheless dependent on their employers for prospects after marriage. Tom cannot picture owning a house with Phillis unless the Sealands or Bevils give them one: “It will be nothing for them to give us a little being of our own, some small tenement out of their large possessions” (351). Tom cannot support himself and Phillis outside of service, so he hopes for a reward for helping sort out the marriages of Lucinda, Indiana, Myrtle, and Bevil Jr.: “Consider, we must strike out some pretty livelihood for ourselves by closing their affairs” (351).
Steele wrote The Conscious Lovers around the first scene of Act IV, in which Bevil Jr. and Myrtle almost provoke a duel. Steele’s motivation in writing this scene was the increasing number of duels between men in the early 18th century; in England’s patriarchal honor culture, there arose the perception that injuries to honor could only be resolved through the violence of a duel. When Myrtle finds out about Bevil Jr. and Lucinda’s correspondence, he feels insulted by Bevil Jr.’s dishonesty. Although they are close friends, Myrtle challenges Bevil Jr. to a duel, per the norm of the time. However, Steele was staunchly opposed to the practice of dueling, insisting that conflicts were better resolved through openness and keeping a cool head. Not giving in to heated emotions becomes key for maintaining the relationships of the play, especially the friendship between Bevil Jr. and Myrtle.
Myrtle has trouble controlling his temper. He enters the play already enraged about Lucinda and Bevil Jr.’s arranged marriage. When he confronts his friend about it, Myrtle refuses to listen to reason; instead, he is easily offended by whatever Bevil Jr. says. When Bevil Jr. claims he is not interested in Lucinda, Myrtle is upset to hear Lucinda dismissed: “my sickly state of mind […] can’t bear to hear her spoken of with levity or unconcern” (340). But, when Bevil Jr. compliments Lucinda to reverse his error, Myrtle is incensed in the other direction: “don’t speak of her as if you love her, neither” (340). Even when Bevil Jr. states that while Lucinda is great, he loves another, Myrtle won’t back down. Bevil Jr. protests that he will in the end come out innocent: “[A]ll things with regard to me will end in your entire satisfaction” (341). However, since “satisfaction” is the term for a duel’s results, Bevil Jr.’s words foreshadow Myrtle’s eventual challenge.
In his duel challenge, Myrtle accuses Bevil Jr. of “carrying on a treaty where you told me you were indifferent” (361), and threatens to bring his sword to their next meeting. Myrtle’s feeling of betrayal is strong enough to push him into a rage that in turn entraps Bevil Jr.: Myrtle accuses his friend of not loving Indiana, which Bevil Jr. takes as a grave insult: “You have touched me beyond the patience of a man” (363). Only Tom’s entrance forces Bevil Jr. to rethink. Restoring his equanimity, Bevil Jr. offers to prove his innocence. After Myrtle reads Lucinda’s exculpating letters, he proclaims his honor restored: He gets “satisfaction from [Bevil Jr.’s] innocence than his sword” (363). This response forms the crux of Steele’s argument that most men would prefer to resolve conflicts peacefully, rather than die for honor. By restraining himself and calming down, Bevil Jr. avoids dueling his friend so they can work together to win their beloveds.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Comedies & Satirical Plays
View Collection
Daughters & Sons
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Marriage
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection