40 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Rousseau introduces the idea of self-love as something natural and inherently good. When humans were in small communities and family groups, this self-love, “amour-propre,” was appropriate and a beautiful part of human nature. However, in this view, when civilization developed, self-love manifested into all types of evil forces—greed, pride, vanity. Rousseau’s own battle with self-love can be seen throughout his memoir and acts in direct contrast to his ideas about the concept. He believes that his father idolized him, and he claims that no other person is equal to his “too affectionate, too loving and too tender heart” (42). Upon meeting Madame de Warens, an encounter he claims altered the course of his life, he spends considerable time detailing his own physical attractiveness. His vanity and extreme self-love disengage him from reality and make it impossible for him to present his memoirs in an objective and realistic way. He embodies the negative aspects of this type of love that he describes as inadequate in his writings—excessive focus on the self and on appearances—without recognizing their defining roles in his own life and work.
In Book III, Rousseau writes his first composed piece, a comedy about Narcissus, a figure in Greek mythology who fell in love with his own reflection in a pool of water. This story mirrors his own greatest vice. Instead of taking it to heart, however, or recognizing its relevance to his own life, he obsessively attempts to have the piece performed, remaining singularly focused on fame and wealth.
Rousseau’s vanity keeps him from committing fully to the purpose of his writing: to confess his misdeeds. He fails to recognize the atrocities he commits and sees them, instead, as foolish acts or as results of his extremist nature. He even reframes his most heinous choices as correlating to the depth of his affection and love for those around him. He seduces married women and exposes himself to young girls at a public well. He fails repeatedly in multiple trades and justifies these failures as products of his esteemed intelligence or passionate love. He secures positions for which he is unqualified, such as becoming a music teacher in Lausanne after only six months of musical training, and blames his failures in those roles on others. His ultimate act of self-justification relates to the abandonment of his five children, which he defends as a result of his fatherly love. He maintains that his decision to force his lover to give up her children and leave them with an orphanage to pursue a life of hard labor offered them a better fate than living with him.
At the end of his memoirs, Rousseau laments the terrible turns his life took and the negative opinion of him held by so many. After everything he experienced and the multiple offenses he committed, he continues to view himself as a victim. He cannot conceive that any negative occurrence could be a result of his own actions.
Young Rousseau was a product of the Enlightenment, which ushered in an age of faith in reason. He quickly became disillusioned with it, however, and became estranged from the other major philosophers in the Salon of Paris. He professed that when humans abandoned their natural state and their participation in small, isolated communities to engage with broader civilization, they lost important parts of themselves and human morality. Through this idea, Rousseau became a major influence on Romanticism, a movement that emphasized a skepticism of reason and a return to the natural. Rousseau perceived everything in the world around him as artifice. When he worked as a secretary, he hated his offices that were filled with people and smoke, the opposite of the beauty of nature in which he found the most joy. He viewed an adherence to reason as an abandonment of the self, as seen when, as a teenager, he first fell in love.
Rousseau claims in Confessions that this love as a child was with his head, not his heart, and it caused him to lose himself. His love for Warens was different, and he repented that she could not love him with the same abandonment of reason. For Warens, sex was about duty and obligation; he suggested that this adherence to rationalism was her greatest flaw: “Instead of listening to her heart, which always guided her aright, she listened to her reason, which guided her wrongly” (211). These notions formed the foundation of Rousseau’s ideas about the Enlightenment and rationalism: Reason would always lead humanity astray, and redemption and salvation could be found in nature.
Rousseau’s first encounters with romantic principles appear during his travels. He recognizes that he is happiest while walking through the countryside, observing nature. He feels disgusted and repelled by city landscapes; when he traveled to Paris—a place known for its beautiful architecture and charm—he found it gross and unappealing. When he leaves Paris, he describes the countryside as giving him “a kind of ecstasy” (180). Rousseau’s time with Warens in a small house in the woods fulfilled his romantic fantasies. The connection with nature he found in that space caused him to feel that he was living for the first time, despite suffering from illness. His connection to nature and his philosophies emphasizing the return of humanity to its natural state separated him from his philosophical contemporaries and severed him from French high society.
From the beginning, Rousseau asserts that he will tell the truth. His obsession with hypocrisy and the deceit of society likens him to Holden Caulfield’s character in The Catcher in the Rye. He is quick to recognize hypocrisy and deceit in others and considers them inexcusable offenses. Meanwhile, he exhibits these qualities himself. While Confessions gives the appearance of verisimilitude, Rousseau establishes his own unreliability as a narrative voice throughout the book. On the first page in Book I, Rousseau establishes that everything he writes is true and that it would hold up in judgment from God. At the same time, he admits that the book’s version of events may be exaggerated.
Rousseau’s distaste for civilization included a hatred of politeness and hypocrisy that he believed were integral to the workings of major societies. Yet, he repeatedly exposes his own acts of deception. He explains that a desire to steal plagued him throughout his life, and the theft of a ribbon from a dying patron led to the dismissal and destruction of the reputation of an innocent servant. While traveling to find a cure for his illness, Rousseau encounters a woman and gives her a false name before entering an affair with her. He never reveals his identity and continues corresponding with her, using this false identity, long after they part ways. Although he professes to value honesty and truth, his life is punctuated by falsehoods.
Thus, he positions himself as an unreliable narrator in a book that purports to present an unequivocal truth. Rousseau explains that his “obstinate nature is unable to bow to facts” (183). Rousseau is so committed to a love for the aesthetic, evidenced even in his views of women, that he cannot help but exaggerate the beauty of something; he confesses this in Book IV. His need for escape means that his brain forever occupies a space of falsity, reveling in false details that make everything seem more fantastic than it is. He claims that Confessions is not an attempt to provide justification for his actions, but he devotes much of the book to validating his choices. He repeatedly contradicts himself, and his perceived mistreatment by French philosophical and fashionable society highlights his failure to apply self-awareness and objectivity.
At the end of Confessions, Rousseau challenges his readers to find a shred of falsehood in his accounts. He asserts that everything he has written is factual. The reception of the book, however, revealed several inaccuracies in his writing, as his contemporaries disputed his depiction of events.
Throughout Rousseau’s life, running away becomes a common theme. His repeated abandonment of jobs, people, and identities directly correlates to the psychological damage suffered in his youth. Rousseau’s mother dies from complications related to childbirth, leaving him to feel abandoned. This perceived rejection follows him throughout his life and influences his relationship with women. His brother, after suffering physical abuse from their father, runs away, never to return. His father, to escape imprisonment after running away from a duel, left the country and entrusted Jean-Jacques to a family member. After enduring abuses from the engraver for whom he worked, as well as his hatred for his life in Geneva, Rousseau ran away from the country one evening on a whim after finding he had not returned home in time for curfew. Rousseau is drawn to Warens because she left her husband, and he sees a correlation between her experiences and his.
We see this theme again when Rousseau chooses to abandon the choirmaster in his illness and return once more to Warens. Book IV is full of abandonments and new journeys. He meets two young ladies, spends the day with them, and feels assured of having an intimate relationship with them, even though he is unable to speak when alone with either of them and does not continue his relationship with them. When offered the opportunity to reconnect with his father, he promises to return to him, but instead travels to another city to look at a lake. He confesses that he is unable to commit to anything that requires his continued attention. He fails to see that his inability to develop intimate relationships with people is tied to his fear of abandonment, and he mistakenly believes that casual encounters equal true intimacy.
The pinnacle of this theme is the abandonment of his five children. Although he claims that Confessions intends to provide deeply personal descriptions of Rousseau’s experiences, he addresses the abandonment of his children casually and with little remorse. As seen throughout his life, Rousseau is unable to connect his own actions to their consequences, and he fails to recognize that the pain he inherited by the death of his mother became a dowry he left to each of his children.
At the end of his memoirs, Rousseau’s lifetime of abandonment transforms into his forced extraction from Paris and, later, his home on the island. His desire to live quietly and in solitude is rendered impossible by a lifetime of not addressing his problems and failing to recognize his own part in his failings.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Jean-Jacques Rousseau