48 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Menocchio was reported to the Inquisition for the second time by Lunardo Simon, a local violinist who met the miller at a festival. Lunardo recalled that Menocchio had conveyed to him a belief in universal religious tolerance. At this point, the Inquisition resumed their investigations of Menocchio and discovered several things that concerned them: He had significant debts, his family had bullied the prior priest for reporting Menocchio to the Inquisition, to the point where the priest left town, and that he was hiding his habitello underneath outer layers of clothing. Despite their suspicion, supportive testimony by the new town priest forced inquisitors to refrain from pressing charges.
Around the same time, Menocchio encountered a converted Jew named Simon who asked him for temporary shelter. Simon reported having similar conversations with Menocchio as Lunardo had with him; he alleged that Menocchio had read the Koran and that he claimed to be associated with unspecified Lutherans. At this point, Ginzburg speculates that Menocchio felt no incentive to repress his ideas any longer, following the death of his wife and closest son. He seemed to be aware that the Inquisition would eventually prosecute and kill him (96). By 1599, a new complaint had been brought to the Inquisition, accusing Menocchio of calling Christ an ass. At this point the Inquisition brought new charges against Menocchio.
Chapter 52 is a relation of the interrogation proceedings from July 12th, 1599. Menocchio, in keeping with his old ways, simultaneously deflected blame for his heretical thoughts to vague demonic forces while defending the logic of these very same thoughts. Among the most interesting developments in his belief system, made evident in this particular session, was an identification of God with fire. Of this, Ginzburg writes, “Menocchio had unwittingly rediscovered […] the universe of the ancient Greek philosophers” (99). Throughout, the inquisitors appear to take on a more aggressive tone than they had before, cornering Menocchio into self-contradicting, repeatedly and without remorse. Finally, they rendered the miller speechless with particularly difficult questions concerning the nature of God.
As the previous chapters illustrate, Menocchio’s manner of interacting with the Inquisition had remained relatively unchanged between the first and second trials, but the content of his religious ideology had developed in intriguing ways. Another change that Ginzburg highlights is Menocchio’s seeming adoption of a new pseudo-prophetic identity, which the author theorizes might have been derivative of the mystical prophetic language in the Koran (101). Furthermore, his core belief in religious tolerance now seemed to be derived from an equal apathy towards the earthly religious institutions of various faiths, rather than a belief in spiritual equality across cultures (100).
Chapter 54 is another composed of raw primary source material, this time a missive submitted by Menocchio to the inquisitors after this first round of interrogation. The note has a strikingly sorrowful tone, as Menocchio bemoans the isolation he has experienced as a result of his heresy, particularly from his own children, and wishes he had died when he was 15 to spare himself and his loved ones the social shame brought by his conviction. Melchiori once again attempted to protect Menocchio, writing an endorsement of the miller at the bottom of this same note, but this time, his defense was relatively feeble. Ginzburg perceives the anguish and resignation in Menocchio’s tone to be an authentic expression of his emotional state in this particular moment (103).
In July 1599, a second interrogation led to the ruling that Menocchio was a relapsed heresiarch. Ginzburg notes that Menocchio was unable to provide for legal counsel as he had in the previous trial, in part because of the interim death of his most supportive son, Ziannuto. In the aftermath of the sentencing, Menocchio was tortured and his house was searched. Some of his personal writings were confiscated, but these have not survived for historians to examine. During the torture session, Menocchio was subjected to the strappado, but refused to name any accomplices to his heresy. Ginzburg speculates that Menocchio was hiding something from the inquisitors, but cannot confirm this instinct (105).
Beginning in Chapter 58, Ginzburg begins to address cases of heresy similar to Menocchio’s from roughly the same time period and region. The first such case is that of Scolio, the pseudonym for the author of Settenario, an unpublished heretical poem written 20 years before the first of Menocchio’s trials. The poem endorses religious tolerance, practical application of religious morality, and the formation of a new utopian society based on these principles. Ginzburg uses Scolio’s writings as evidence that his proposed peasant culture was not unique to Menocchio, but was in fact shared by other radical peasant thinkers (111).
Even more similar to Menocchio is the example of Pellegrino Baroni, who was also a miller. Baroni put forward an egalitarian vision of Paradise, sparred rhetorically with his inquisitors, and refused to admit to having any accomplices. Based on this striking similarity, Ginzburg puts forward one of his most speculative arguments yet: that millers were more prone to engaging in heretical belief than others because of their working conditions. He calls them “an occupational group especially receptive to new ideas and inclined to propagate them” (114).
Ginzburg traces Baroni’s introduction to heretical thought to a clandestine meeting in Bologna at the house of Vicenzo Bolognetti, where the famous heretic Camillo Renato is known to have spoken. Also present at this meeting, he asserts, was Turca, the translator of De Trinitatis erroribus, a text which Ginzburg previously theorized was read by Menocchio. Within this one meeting, therefore, Ginzburg perceives a surprisingly small network of heretical thinkers across Northern Italy, drawing direct connections between Menocchio and other known peasant radicals, all within the home of a nobleman.
Now approaching the end of his analysis, Ginzburg reaffirms his belief in an undercurrent of peasant culture, invisible to modern historians, but nonetheless socially and ideologically influential. He furthermore refutes this idea of monodirectional idea transmission from upper classes to lower classes (119). He understands increasing efforts at suppression of popular culture during the period, through institutions such as the Inquisition, as an upper-class effort towards quelling this circularity.
By autumn 1599, word of Menocchio’s heresy had reached the Pope himself, who determined that the miller should be killed as an example for others. On the eve of the 17th century, Menocchio was burned at the stake, and reports of his death reach the historical record by 1601.
Menocchio’s time in Montereale between the two trials offers some of the book’s most important details for the theme of Community and Marginalization. On the one hand, Ginzburg argues that the miller was able to retain a surprising amount of social credibility after the first trial: “Apparently no one found it scandalous that a heretic, a heresiarch in fact, should administer the funds of the parish” (90). On the other hand, Menocchio’s testimony in the second trial speaks to his profound sense of loneliness. His sorrowful lamentation, “the sons and daughters who remain to me consider me crazy because I have been their ruination […] and if only I had died when I was fifteen, they would be without the bother of this poor wretch” (103) indicate that this isolation was occurring on even the familial level.
Though the contours of Menocchio’s interpersonal relationships, both with family members and other townspeople, remain murky, primary source material nevertheless suggests that they were essential in his experience of the Inquisition. By 1599, as Ginzburg notes, Menocchio feared death less than he feared a continuation of his pariah-like status. Such an extreme shift in his attitude speaks to the potency of humiliation as a punishment levied by the Inquisition.
The tragic tone of Menocchio’s missive anticipates the tone of the book’s ending overall. Ginzburg’s final observation, that “we know nothing” (121) of other men like Menocchio who were executed by the Inquisition, highlights the fragility of microhistorical information. Indeed, this ending is a reminder of the ephemerality of Menocchio’s life and historical trace. Even as Ginzburg tries to assert a more widespread phenomenon of millers engaging in heresy, clarity eludes him. Scolio and Baroni emerge as figures potentially associated with Menocchio, if not directly then indirectly, but their significance is truly murky.
Ginzburg acknowledges the tenuity of these arguments, writing, “even the possibility of an encounter between the sophisticated humanist Lisia Fileno and the miller Pighino Baroni […] is also a conjecture” (116). Thus, the speculative underpinnings of The Cheese and the Worms begin to collapse in its final chapters, and Ginzburg struggles to find a resolution to the conjectural threads he has woven together. In the end, his open-ended meditation on the invisibility of other Inquisition victims indicates that no concrete conclusion is possible. Speculation is therefore a fraught, but necessary aspect of Ginzburg’s method, and it heightens the tragedy of the story that he tells.
By the end of the book, Ginzburg has not necessarily reached concrete conclusions in regards to his three core themes, but as has been established, Ginzburg is not concerned with concrete conclusions, narrative or analytical. Instead The Cheese and the Worms is intended as a suggestive work of history, aimed at opening up new possibilities of study within the field. Some of these possibilities are the opportunity to shift the historical paradigm away from elitist understandings of culture, to pay attention to figures who may initially seem irrelevant, and to study “misinterpretation” as an essential aspect of cultural history. Indeed, in the nearly 50 years since The Cheese and the Worms was first published, historians have taken to exploring these possibilities with vigor.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: