52 pages 1 hour read

The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Adult | Published in 1892

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

“The Boscombe Valley Mystery”Chapter Summaries & Analyses

“The Boscombe Valley Mystery” Summary

The story opens with Watson and his wife having breakfast when they are interrupted by a telegram sent by Holmes. The detective is about to leave for Boscombe Valley as he has been hired to exonerate a young man accused of patricide. Holmes is requesting Watson’s assistance in the case.

Watson’s wife encourages him to agree to the invitation and he is soon packed and ready for an adventure. While the two men are on the train, Holmes explains the situation to his friend. A wealthy landowner, John Turner, who made his money in Australia, has provided a farm, free of charge, to another man from Australia, Charles McCarthy. Both are widowers and McCarthy has a son, James, while Turner has a daughter, Alice. One day while in the forest, McCarthy and his son fight. Sometime later, the young man comes running out of the trees covered in blood seeking help. When people follow, they find McCarthy’s dead body. The police conclude that the young man killed his father. Turner’s daughter, however, who is in love with James, is convinced of his innocence and appeals to Holmes for help.

The two friends are met at the train station by detective Lestrade of Scotland yard, “a lean, ferret-like man, furtive and sly-looking” (73). The policeman is convinced of the young man’s guilt and scoffs at Holmes’s suggestion that there is another criminal at large. After talking to James in person, the detective concludes that the young man is innocent as he was visiting his secret wife, a tavern server. The argument stemmed from the father’s desire for James to marry Alice and the young man’s knowledge that his previous marriage precludes him from doing so, even if he is in love with Alice.

Afterward, Holmes carefully examines the crime scene. He invites Turner to the hotel and confronts him with the truth. Holmes deduced that the landowner is the murderer. It turns out that while in Australia, Turner used to be a thief who made his wealth robbing a gold convoy and killing everyone, except the coachman, McCarthy. Turner returns to England and establishes himself as a respected landowner with his ill-gotten money. However, years later, McCarthy sees and recognizes Turner and begins blackmailing him. Alice would be devastated to learn of her father’s past, so he concedes to all demands until the day McCarthy demands his son marry Alice. While trying to resolve the issue during a meeting in the forest, Turner kills McCarthy in a fit of rage. The detective decides not to inform the police as Turner is terminally ill. The landowner writes a signed confession to be used as a last resort. However, with Holmes’s help, James is cleared without the truth coming to light, and the two young people decide to get married.

“The Boscombe Valley Mystery” Analysis

The fourth story in the collection introduces the character of Greg Lestrade, the Scotland Yard detective who, like Irene Adler, gains prominence in contemporary TV adaptations. Watson does not describe him particularly positively. Moreover, as he represents the authorities, his dismissal of Holmes and his intellectual laziness makes it easy for the reader to sympathize with Holmes’s decision not to inform Lestrade of the truth.

The story also presents the first instance where Holmes consciously chooses to hide the truth as an act of mercy. Even if he claims that “It is not for me to judge you,” he effectively takes on the role of judge and jury and concludes that Turner’s life, spent under the constant threat of blackmail, as well as his terminal illness, are sufficient punishment for his murders, past and present (87). This moment highlights Holmes’s function as an alternative to the official judicial system. As he is a private citizen, he is not bound by professional expectations, only by his moral convictions. A policeman would not have such a choice upon learning the identity of a murderer. And a jury would be bound to carry out justice in the open, creating a scandal. For Victorian society, such public scrutiny might have been considered worse than the crime. Furthermore, Alice, as a woman, would have carried a stigma for the rest of her life.

The choice to keep secrets and get people to do what he wants them to is a power play on Holmes’s part. Knowledge is power, so in a situation where only Holmes knows what has occurred, he holds all the cards. In this situation, he is shown to be merciful and tolerant, but that does mean he does not enjoy the sense of his superiority.

Based on this decision, it seems Holmes values mercy for those who are alive and affected by the crime over the punishment of the criminals. Turner’s arrest and prosecution would cause grief to his innocent daughter and his friends and neighbors, while not resulting in any significant positive changes as the man is about to die regardless of the verdict. In this way, the author presents an alternative vision of justice but still uses fate to simplify Holmes’s decision. It would not be such an easy decision if Turner were not terminally ill. Ultimately, the potentially difficult moral choice is side-stepped by the landowner’s condition and the victim’s criminal past.

The two young people, Turner’s daughter and McCarthy’s son, are depicted as somewhat naïve and not particularly intelligent but amiable and moral. Alice, especially, is described as beautiful and steadfast. Their budding love endears them further, proving that Holmes’s decision to keep his silence was the right one.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 52 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools