59 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The book begins on June 21, 1941, in Berlin. The Soviet ambassador urgently tried to make contact with Nazi officials. A large military buildup on the German-Soviet border was noticed, and though Joseph Stalin was convinced this was a scare tactic, the ambassador was ordered to find out what was happening. Later that night the German diplomat Joachim von Ribbentrop met with Soviet officials and declared war on an invasion that was already occurring. Before the Russian officials left, Ribbentrop confided in them that he was against this invasion.
In Russia, reports from the frontline were confused. Stalin’s insistence that no war was close meant frontier units were not prepared when the German attack began and war was only formally declared two hours after the beginning of the assault. Over the first few days of the attack, the Wehrmacht (German army) was able to exploit this confusion, scoring rapid successes against the Soviets. Stalin even considered surrender but was talked out of this by the Bulgarian ambassador.
At midday on June 22, the invasion was reported to Soviet citizens. This news prompted a powerful reaction; many immediately signed up for the military or began to help the war effort in factories. It was commonly believed that with one decisive push, the German army would be shattered, and the motherland saved. In Stalingrad, university students prepared a map on which they hoped to track the advance of the Red Army into Germany. Beevor ends the chapter by saying that none yet imagined the fate of the Soviet Union or the city of Stalingrad.
The German offensive (codenamed Operation Barbarossa) was the largest invasion in history. Four million soldiers were made ready along the border with the Soviet Union with the aim of establishing a defensive line that ran along the Soviet border. Soviet industry was to be captured or destroyed by the Luftwaffe (the German air force). Most German soldiers received orders at nightfall on June 21. As the Wehrmacht had seen nothing but success so far, the majority felt this would be a short war.
Nazi propaganda sold the invasion as a Rassenkampf, a race war between Germans and Bolsheviks that must be won so that the German state could survive. The dehumanization of Russians, and especially Russian Jews, proved so successful that the “special orders” (14) many regimental officers received—which ordered collective measures against partisans and the massacre of Jewish people—saw only limited objections. Post-war claims that the Wehrmacht was ignorant of the war crimes being committed by the SS (or Schutzstaffel, the elite security branch of the Nazi Party) are shown by Beevor to be demonstrably false, but the Wehrmacht is noted to not have been a homogeneous entity. Some held anti-Nazi beliefs and protested massacres.
On June 22 at 3:15 am German artillery began to bombard Russian frontier units. Hours earlier, the land mines near the border had been removed and some German units had infiltrated behind Russian lines to cut communications and sow chaos. At dawn, the infantry advanced and aerial raids were launched against Soviet airfields, destroying 1,200 Soviet planes in the next nine hours. German strategy focused on Panzer divisions encircling the Russian armies to destroy the Soviet fighting capability before advancing on their three main objectives: Leningrad, Moscow, and Ukraine. These were to be attacked by Army Group North, Army Group Centre, and Army Group South, respectively. German generals prioritized Moscow as the key goal, but Hitler emphasized the importance of seizing the agricultural wealth of Ukraine and the oil fields in the Caucuses. Because of this, Army Group South was reinforced with soldiers intended for the center, with the armies of Hungary and Romania attached to it.
Beevor writes that few offensives have ever had the advantages of Operation Barbarossa. Complete surprise had been achieved because of Stalin’s insistence on reconciliation with Hitler. Soviet armies were rapidly encircled and annihilated while German forces made continual progress eastward. The heaviest fighting happened in the south, where the Russian general had prepared defenses, but the Germans still advanced.
Most held the view that the USSR would collapse shortly after the invasion, especially because Stalin had been purging his army officers since 1937. Around 36,671 officers had been executed, imprisoned, or dismissed. In recent conflicts, the Russians had generally performed poorly, and in the early stages of Operation Barbarossa, the Germans felt confirmed in their low opinion of Russian fighting. They saw the Soviet Union’s politics as leading to fundamental flaws in its military; generals were unwilling to take the initiative in case it led to them being persecuted. Beevor supports their analysis, describing a “hysteria of deflected blame” (24) in Russian leadership after the German invasion, but he notes that lessons were being learned. By July 15, the Stavka (staff office) of the Russian general Georgy Zhukov had made a document analyzing the failures in the war and suggesting that their army should be reformed to become a more responsive and rapid organization. Also in the Russian favor was the consistent tenacity of the Russian soldiers in defense. They had been convinced by Soviet propaganda of the need to stand against the Germans or die.
Despite Russian bravery, by mid-July, the Red Army was in a bad position. Two million men, 3,500 tanks, and 6,000 airplanes had been lost. Losses continued to mount as several armies were trapped in Smolensk and the city of Kyiv was encircled. The Germans felt they were fighting machine-like soldiers—mass-produced and mindless.
The momentum of the German advance began to fade in mid-July. The size of Russia, the seemingly never-ending supply of Russian armies, vehicle breakdowns, and the health toll of a continual rapid advance contributed to the offensive stagnating. The logistical struggle of launching three separate invasions across a huge front was simply beyond the operational capability of the Wehrmacht. Frustrations led to quarrels among the German staff—mostly concerning whether Moscow should be the main goal or Ukraine. Hitler, emphasizing the importance of Ukraine, ordered Army Group Centre to halt while Panzer elements were detached and sent to Army Groups North and South. Hitler then changed his mind but it was late September before the army was again ready to advance. By this time, winter was coming close, which would end the German advance. Beevor argues that Hitler’s previous victories and lack of real military experience meant that he ignored the logistical issues faced by his forces—a problem compounded by his refusal to gear the German economy for an all-out war.
The renewed German offensive against Moscow threw Russian lines into confusion and though Stalin initially refused to acknowledge the scale of the threat, soon 100,000 citizens in Moscow were formed into a militia, and 250,000 people—many of whom were women—were tasked with constructing defenses around the city. The weather began to hamper German efforts but they were still able to encircle two more Russian armies, prompting Stalin to hold a crisis meeting on October 17 to discuss whether he should leave Moscow, which he eventually decided against. At this time, he would demand accurate reports from the frontlines but accuse those who told him the truth of panic-mongering.
The Germans were ultimately unable to break through Russian lines and withdrew forward elements of their army to more favorable defensive positions for the winter. Hitler’s insistence that no winter campaigns be launched meant that many Germans lacked adequate clothing against the cold, leading to 100,000 cases of frostbite among soldiers. As the Germans were suffering, the Russian army launched a large counterattack using tanks and planes well-made for cold weather. The offensive made considerable progress, forcing the Germans to retreat. This convinced Stalin that he could break the German army, so on January 5, 1942, he announced his plans for a general offensive across the wide front. Hitler, conversely, was convinced that if his soldiers continued to hold, this would finally break the Russian army, so he refused to allow for a retreat. Russian attacks were occasionally able to encircle German armies, but these were resupplied by air, which convinced Hitler this was a viable strategy for all future Kessels.
In the winter, German soldiers searched for food, clothing, and shelter, which led to Russian civilians being looted and displaced. The Russian army was a little better, destroying houses to deny the Germans shelter. Within this brutal conflict, many German soldiers suffered from extreme homesickness but were forbidden from telling civilians about the war.
The German army was not broken by Russian attacks in the winter of 1941-1942, but Beevor argues by December 1941, the balance of power in the world had swung decisively against the Axis. The Germans had been unable to knock Russia out of the war swiftly and—with America’s entry into the war—the Allies now had a notable industrial advantage. However, the Battle of Stalingrad would be the psychological turning point in World War II (WWII).
In Part 1 Beevor establishes the background to the Battle of Stalingrad, focusing on the first six months of the war between Russia and Germany, Operation Barbarossa, and the Russian counteroffensives of 1941-1942. In discussing this, he argues that the year 1941 was a key turning point in WWII. His analysis of Operation Barbarossa in this section is focused on highlighting the reasons for German success while stressing that the factors that would eventually lead to Germany’s defeat were already present. The German military synergy between massed armored formations and the Luftwaffe allowed rapid advances and encirclements of enemy armies—especially in Russia, where their opponent was surprised and slow to react. However, the immense scope of the campaign, Hitler’s meddling, and the tenacity of Russian soldiers made German victory impossible. By outlining these details, Beevor prepares for his later sections that demonstrate how these pre-existing issues with Nazi Germany’s war in Russia led to defeat at Stalingrad
In discussing both sides’ early successes and failures, Beevor establishes one of his key themes: The Dynamics of Warfare and Strategy under a Dictatorship. This is supported by his evaluation and comparison of the parallel leaders, Hitler and Stalin. Beevor is highly critical of the effectiveness of dictators in times of war, often emphasizing that the outsized importance of their opinions led to dangerous decisions that ran counter to military professionals and—at times—common sense. Beevor presents Hitler as a meddling military amateur, highlighting his vacillation on the focus of Operation Barbarossa, much to the chagrin of his generals. Hitler’s proud insistence that the Wehrmacht would not retreat in the face of the Soviet winter offensive caused unnecessary damage to his already smaller army. While the Wehrmacht was generally successful in 1941, Beevor shows that Hitler’s pride and micromanagement were fundamental flaws in the Nazi military and one that would later prove fatal at Stalingrad—foreshadowing the book’s historical outcome.
Beevor highlights the same theme in his treatment of Stalin, highlighting Stalin’s weakening of his army by purging officers and his steadfast refusal to prepare for a war against Germany. Cumulatively, these two factors were essential for German victories, as it meant their invasion was against an enemy paralyzed by surprise and a fear of standing out by taking initiative. The threat of execution is shown to be massively damaging for Soviet war-making. However, harmful as the Soviet Union’s system is shown to be, Beevor emphasizes that some reform was possible within it, as Zhukov began to analyze what caused its defeats. This capacity for eventually learning from mistakes allowed the Soviet Union to eventually succeed while Hitler failed.
Beevor also begins to discuss The Brutality of the Eastern Front, an important theme in the book. In Part 1 he establishes that, on the German side, brutality was largely driven by pre-invasion Nazi propaganda. Through selling the war as a Rassenkrieg in which the “Bolsheviks” would annihilate Germany if they were not themselves wiped out, Hitler had already dehumanized his enemy and so gave his soldiers license to commit atrocities against Russian combatants and civilians. Beevor emphasizes the effectiveness of this strategy by showing that objection to the “special orders” (14), which amounted to demands to commit war crimes, was sparse in the Wehrmacht. This is an example of Beevor’s use of primary sources to enable him to draw sophisticated historical conclusions. It is also indicative of his book’s willingness to deal with sensitive issues of mass culpability within living memory, and to actively challenge post-war cultural narratives which assert innocence.
Soviet brutality is also discussed and shown to stem from the same fundamental motivation as the Germans. The Soviet willingness to destroy the homes of their own civilians to deny the Germans shelter shows how a war described by both sides as a life-and-death struggle allows for any action to be excusable. Beevor uses the violence of the Eastern Front to show the dangers of dehumanization, which allows for the boundaries of conventional morality to be removed, heading into his theme of Morale and the Humanity of the Soldier.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: