53 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide refers to the commodification and extreme violence of slavery, indentured servitude, debt peonage, sexual violence, rape, graphic torture, and systemic racism.
Public acknowledgments of slavery often invoke the “agency” of enslaved people. Why does Hartman think that such a move is dangerously “romantic”? Instead of turning our attention to enslaved agency, where instead does Hartman think we should look?
If emancipation is the legal liberation from enslavement, why does Hartman describe emancipated individuality as “burdened”? How is the end of slavery a burden and not a liberation?
Abolitionists relied on scenes of graphic violence in their argument against slavery. This was particularly important in the context of pro-slavery rhetoric that insisted that enslaved people had a high tolerance for pain. Abolitionists wanted to thus display enslaved pain as pain. At the same time, Hartman argues that this abolitionist reproduction of pain was itself a form of violence and that enslaved pain is too “easily” reproduced and viewed, even today. What are alternatives to this representation of pain in the study of slavery?
Hartman argues that the civil rights that were conferred with emancipation were inadequate if true liberation was to be achieved. What is the difference between emancipation from slavery and freedom? How are rights not enough?
How does Hartman challenge the historical periodization of slavery (the categorization of time periods)?
Concerns about “miscegenation” became politically “hot” after emancipation. Why were interracial sexual relations of particular relevance during this period and not during slavery?
Current discussions of slavery have argued that the use of “enslaved person” should be used instead of “slave,” emphasizing the personhood of enslaved people rather than the fact of their enslavement. Does such a rhetoric rely on the liberal humanism—and its assumption of personhood and full agency--that Hartman cautions us against?
After emancipation Black mobility was perceived by many whites as threatening. Why? Did this signify the “burdensome individuality” of freedom or the pleasure of mobility and travel?
How is Hartman’s discussion of sexual “consent” in slavery relevant to current discussions of rape?