Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World

Much of Range relies on anecdotes to supply evidence for Epstein’s argument. Do you find this approach convincing? How do anecdotes support his argument? Whether you agree with Epstein’s approach, on what basis might some criticize it?

Range includes examples of individuals and institutions from both contemporary and historical periods. What do you make of this diversity? Does it help or hinder Epstein’s overall argument, and why?

At times, Epstein includes anecdotes from his own life, such as when he describes his struggles on his collegiate track team. Why do you think he included these? What do they add to the book? Is their inclusion successful? Why or why not?