40 pages 1 hour read

No Impact Man: The Adventures of a Guilty Liberal Who Attempts to Save the Planet, and the Discoveries He Makes About Himself and Our Way of Life in the Process

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2009

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 1-2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 1 Summary: “How a Schlub Like Me Gets Mixed Up in a Stunt like This”

The author introduces the premise of his book—that he, his wife, and his baby daughter try to live for one year in New York City while creating a “net zero impact on the environment”(14). To do so, he tried not to create trash (so he had to give up takeout food), no carbon dioxide production (so no driving or flying), no toxic substances in the water such as from the use of laundry detergent, and no purchasing of produce from faraway places (more than 250 miles), in addition to all the other prohibitions, such as not using plastics, etc.

Beavan then goes into how he arrived at this idea. He and his wife, Michelle, are a study in contrasts. He describes her as “all Daddy’s gold AMEX and taxi company charge account and huge boats”(3), while he describes himself as a wannabe hippie who was raised to hate materialism. He reports that his friend even spoke to his own therapist about Colin’s differences with Michelle. In return for allowing his wife to watch reality TV, which he hates, she agrees not to wear fur. He has become more materialistic than he would like, but he also spends time registering voters and trying to be a good liberal.

However, things come to an impasse when Michelle was offered a white-fox fur shawl from a friend whose father works in the fur business in Minneapolis, her hometown. Beavan drops by his wife’s therapy session and agrees that she can have the fur shawl if she reads portions of the PETA anti-fur brochure. Michelle, moved to sympathy, decides not to wear the fur, but the author has an even greater epiphany: “I had mobilized my intellectual and persuasive resources to get someone else to change her behavior and remained, I saw, utterly complacent about my own” (6). He realizes that his activism focuses too much on changing other people and not himself.

At the same time, more information is coming out about global warming as the US refuses to sign the Kyoto Protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, his reaction to these events has been to date just to blame George Bush while still turning on two air conditioners without only a moment of guilt. He lives in Greenwich Village, New York, with his 2-year-old daughter, Isabelle, and his wife—where he witnesses summer-like weather in the winter and a freak snowstorm with lightning and thunder. While the author has just written a book about World War II, he is more concerned about what is happening in today’s world. He reads about polar bears drowning as they try to swim what had formerly been the polar ice cap, and he reads about the bears cannibalizing others’ young because the bears are starving.

He realizes that most people in our society are unhappy with their lives, and their lives, consumed by working, have little meaning. We are working only to survive or, for the lucky few, to have expensive toys that are destroying the planet. On a summery day in the middle of winter, the reality of the author’s non-activism hits him, and he feels as though he is “hitting bottom” (9). He decides that his own lack of initiative is what is causing him to hit bottom.

At a lunch with his agent, Eric Simonoff, in Manhattan, Beavan launches into a rant about global warming. He speaks about the inaction of politicians and the giant plastic shelf in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, as well as other consequences of the environmental crisis, including health issues like the high rate of asthma in the South Bronx. He wants to write a book that encourages people to be kinder to each other and to the planet. His agent replies that it will be hard to convince a publisher to spend money on “a book that tells them how screwed up they are” (12). He realizes that as his agent says this, he has no authority to write such a book anyway.

The author tells a Zen koan that captures his dilemma. The koan is about two rival groups of warring monks who fight over the right to have a cat in their respective residences. The Zen master asks them to say one word expressing love about the cat or he will slit the cat’s throat. None of them says anything, as they are more involved in beating out each other than taking care of the cat, so the Zen master slits the cat’s throat. Beavan thinks that he and politicians are like the warring monks—”never exerting much energy towards anything but winning the argument” (13).

The author decides that he has to change himself before changing others and gives his agent another call. At the second lunch, he tells his agent that he wants to change himself first—and that, like Superman trying to save the world from the bottom up, he will be “No Impact Man.” He decides to write a book while keeping a blog on the Internet to document his plan: “I didn’t just want to have no carbon impact. I wanted to have no environmental impact” (14).

He dedicates himself, his wife, his toddler, and his dog to this project and decides to implement the project in stages. First, he will try to produce no garbage. In the second stage, he will try to travel by means that don’t produce carbon, and the third stage will involve changing consumer choices about water, electricity, and heat. In addition, he will try to have a positive impact through efforts such as cleaning up the Hudson River and giving money to charity. He comes up with the following equation:“Negative Impact + Positive Impact=No net impact” (15).

He plans to be more philosophical than scientific and to try to do more good than harm for a year. His idea is not that we should all give up conveniences but to conduct an investigation into how much these conveniences help us or hurt us and whether we can live without them. He wonders whether the environmental consequences of producing a book will be outweighed by the collective good that results. The crux of his inquiry is whether we can address the crisis we are in and whether we can change the world. To answer this question, the author feels that he has to put himself into extreme conditions.

As he was carrying out his project, documentary filmmakers became interested in making a movie about him and his family, and the New York Times also came upon his blog. He became, to his surprise, an environmental leader to whom people turned to find out how they too could make a difference. At first, though, he just wants to change minds in a “non-finger-wagging” (17) way by taking on change himself.

Chapter 2 Summary: “Day One and the Whole Thing is a Big Mistake”

As the project begins, the author does not feel heroic. Instead, he has to blow his nose and wonders how to do so. Although he is supposed to be “an environmental superhero” (19), he blows his nose on a paper towel and begins to berate himself for doing so and wakes his toddler up while blowing his nose.

A few days earlier, he wrestled with the paper-or-plastic question and asks a woman at a local organic grocery store which option is better. She recommended plastic for the handles. He had called a large environmental organization who admitted to him that they aren’t good at telling people how to live more environmental lives. He realized later that he needed to carry a reusable bag to the grocery store.

Beavan discusses the fact that everyone has an environmental impact because we emit carbon dioxide. The title he chose for the project—“No Impact Man”—shows how naive he is. He is idealistic at the start of the project and has to pave the way towards finding an answer about minimizing his environmental impact on his own. The misinformation out in the public only confuses him. For example, he has heard that washing ceramic cups is worse for the environment than using disposable cups. He also considers the diaper debate. A child by age 2 goes through 4,000 plastic diapers, while the child would only need 30 cloth diapers—but those diapers would need to be washed. He finds that there is no “environmental living road-map to follow” (23). The confusion seems to create paralysis, as companies even call chainsaws green because they use less gas. The author refers to this process of calling everything on the market environmentally friendly “greenwashing” (23).

Instead of choosing among the products on the market, the author recommends choosing fewer products. When he has to blow his nose, he realizes he can use cloth napkins. He later realizes that wanting to blow one’s nose is not a sign of self-centeredness and that it’s wrong to frame the debate as selfishness versus altruism. Instead, it is the battle between old and new habits.

Beavan doesn’t believe that asceticism is the answer, as he does not endorse renouncing human desires. Instead, he believes that human instincts are good and that we should learn to use our desires to make us happy. The field of positive psychology looks at the ways in which people who are not mentally ill can increase their happiness. Positive psychologists realized that while buying goods can make us happy, this happiness was fleeting, and we needed to buy more and more to make us happy. They referred to this as the “hedonistic treadmill”(26). Positive psychologists realized that the happiest people were not on this treadmill but instead had found ways to infuse their daily lives with meaning and social connections. The author aims, in the parlance of positive psychologists, to get off the “hedonistic treadmill.”He connects these ideas to what simple-living advocates have been suggesting—a life that concentrates “with less emphasis on acquisition” (26).

Beavan dedicates his family to connecting to their community and breaking away from their lives as “media-addicted take-out slaves” (26). Rather than becoming ascetics, he wants his family to steer a middle ground between self-denial and hedonism. He wants to embrace the philosophy of the Menominee tribe of Wisconsin, which has been cutting their timber for sale for generations but still have more standing board feet in trees than they had in 1870. They accomplish this by only cutting the weak trees and letting the strong trees stay as the upper canopy in which animals can live. He wants, like the Menominee, to work productively with what the world offers, rather than taking what they want.

As he tries to live a garbage-less life in New York, he runs into friends who tell him it’s impossible to do so in New York City and who advise him to move to the country. However, Beavan notes that more than half of the world’s population now lives in urban areas and that these areas establish patterns for the rest of the world. The good part of cities like New York is that they offer economies of scale. Because people can share transportation and buildings, New Yorkers emit “29 percent” (28) less carbon per capita than people in the rest of America, but New York produces greater amounts of pollution, including air pollution and garbage. Many people ask Beavan how he can be environmental in New York, but he thinks that city people should stay where they are and try to figure out how to live in a more sustainable way.

The author cuts back to his first day as No Impact Man, when he is faced with finding a solution for his daughter’s diapers, which “make up 4 percent of [their] trash” (30). However, in the moment, he has to use another plastic diaper. Beavan then considers his wife, Michelle, who is 39. She and the author also have Frankie, a 4-year-old dog who came from a kill shelter in North Carolina. Beavan has asked Michelle to commit to the No Impact project when she wasn’t really listening. She agrees, as long as the project has no bearing on whether they will have another child.

On the first day of the project, the author gets his daughter, Isabelle, some milk and then is faced with what to do with the carton. He wants to quit, but his wife encourages him. The week before, they had saved their garbage and realized they had produced “a total of ninety gallons in only four days” (33). They gear up for the day ahead by putting Isabelle in a back contraption rather than a stroller because it will be easier on the stairs and then realize that they are taking the elevator—and shouldn’t be.

Chapters 1-2 Analysis

In these chapters, the author intersperses his personal experiences launching his No Impact Man experiment with his meditations on how to lead a sustainable life. His approach is to portray himself and his family as bumbling. The idea behind this portrayal is that if they can lead sustainable lives, so can we. Beavan is not a holier-than-thou ascetic or a fringe environmentalist. He is instead a fallible human whose first day as “No Impact Man” is a disaster, as he blows his nose in a paper towel, wakes up his toddler, and uses a plastic diaper. Beavan describes himself as a kind of bumbling fool who is just like any of us. He is not a kind of pure sage or someone we can’t emulate but someone who, as a normal human being, is trying to radically change his life to create a less noticeable human footprint.

The author’s metaphor and guiding example through this experiment is the Menominee tribe of Wisconsin. This tribe lives off its timber and has done so since 1870. However, rather than facing depleting or exhausting resources, the tribe has more standing board feet of trees than they did in the past by only chopping the weakest trees. The Menominee stand for the type of life that the author wants to live with his family. He doesn’t want to be an ascetic or to renounce life’s pleasures. Instead, as the Menominee have, he wants to find a way to live a sustainable life and a life that co-exists with the natural world around him. He believes that by not wasting what’s around him, he can live a life that’s not wasted but “savored and enjoyed” (46).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 40 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools