35 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Chapter 4 explains Indigenous Americans’ complicated responses to Christianity. Much Indigenous spirituality involved dreams and rituals rather than public professions of faith, and Indigenous Americans did not proselytize. Christian missionaries, in contrast, insisted on conversion; to them, it was a matter of saving souls. Indigenous Americans reacted to this missionary zeal in a variety of ways. Some converted, some resisted, and some found ways to incorporate elements of Christianity into their traditional spiritualism. Because the pressure to convert moved in only one direction, European communities maintained their religious cohesion, but Indigenous communities suffered deep internal divisions. Indigenous traditionalists often regarded Christian converts as cultural traitors. In New England, this religious dissension among Indigenous communities helped create an atmosphere of tension that led to King Philip’s War (1675-76). Meanwhile, Spain’s Catholic missionaries, in the spirit of the Inquisition, applied even greater pressure to convert and met with even more successful resistance, as evidenced by the 1680 Pueblo Revolt. Notwithstanding these dramatic and violent episodes, Indigenous Americans’ response to Christianity “often lay somewhere between total acceptance and total rejection” (92).
Chapter 5 describes both the nature and consequences of warfare in Colonial America. Indigenous Americans learned that they could not fight Europeans by massing their warriors and engaging in pitched battles. They adopted a different way of fighting, more subtle and mobile–what one European called “the skulking way of war” (104). Meanwhile, Europeans learned the value of Indigenous allies and seldom went to war without them.
The new world of warfare featured a mixture of Indigenous and European elements. Indigenous Americans adopted guns and horses, while the most successful European warriors learned the “skulking way.” Every major conflict in colonial North America pitted Europeans and their Indigenous allies against other Europeans and their Indigenous allies. Some historians have suggested that the blending of European and Indigenous tactics produced a unique “American way of war,” without which victory in the American Revolution would not have been possible (113).
Calloway explores complexities involved in diplomatic conduct. Throughout the colonial period, English, French, and Spanish empires contended with one another and cultivated alliances among various Indigenous nations. Meanwhile, dozens of formidable tribes conducted diplomacy for their own purposes. Larger nations or confederacies such as the Iroquois in the North and the Creek in the South dictated the balance of power in their respective regions.
The decentralization of authority among Indigenous Americans, coupled with European land-greed and the unscrupulousness of treatymakers, produced a good deal of confusion and resentment. Language also posed a substantial barrier. Interpreters not only translated specific words but also imparted meaning and thus took on a broader role as cultural mediator. Indigenous peoples learned European diplomacy and sometimes attended negotiations dressed in European-style dress or while bearing European symbols such as a crucifix. Europeans learned the importance of gift-giving, peace pipes, and wampum belts.
Chapters 4-6 explore new worlds in religion, war, and diplomacy. King Philip’s War of 1675-76 in New England, which Calloway mentions throughout the book, serves as an example of dramatic changes in all three areas.
In the mid-17th century, Puritan minister John Eliot set out to convert local Indigenous Americans to Christianity. Unlike Catholics in New Spain and New France, Puritans were unlikely missionaries, for Puritanism taught that salvation was reserved for an “elect” few. Nonetheless, Eliot established a total of 14 so-called “praying towns,” where Indigenous Americans lived together as part of a Christian community. It appears that these communities, including the “showpiece praying town” of Natick, attracted converts from smaller and more vulnerable tribes (77). Leaders and warriors from larger tribes, including the Wampanoag, resented the praying towns and regarded their inhabitants as cultural traitors. In 1675, the English executed three Wampanoags for murdering a praying-town convert. Metacomet, the Wampanoag chief known as “King Philip” to the English, forged an alliance with several smaller tribes and went to war against Puritan New England.
In the summer and fall of 1675, Metacomet’s forces launched surprise attacks on more than a dozen Massachusetts towns, many of them on the colony’s western frontier. Early victories drove fleeing colonists eastward. As the war spread, the powerful Narragansetts of Rhode Island entered the conflict, bolstering Metacomet’s numbers. With the help of Mohegan, Pequot, and other praying-town allies, New England’s militia repelled several attacks, but Metacomet’s “anti-English confederation” had the advantage (100). The tide turned in the winter of 1675-76, when Mohawks from New York entered the war on the English side. Metacomet’s forces suffered a series of defeats and spent the summer of 1676 on the defensive. On August 12, a praying-town Wampanoag shot and killed Metacomet himself. Thereafter, Metacomet’s confederation disintegrated.
On the surface, King Philip’s War might appear to refute rather than support Calloway’s larger argument. It was a brutal and catastrophic conflict in which thousands lost their lives on both sides. Plymouth colonists dismembered Metacomet’s corpse and displayed his head on a pike. Vanquished Wampanoags, Narragansetts, and others were enslaved in the Caribbean and elsewhere. Per capita, King Philip’s War remains the most destructive war in American history.
On the other hand, King Philip’s War illustrates exactly the sort of “new world” Europeans and Indigenous Americans created throughout North America. Christian missionaries won converts whose mere existence caused tension in Native communities. These converts, along with other friendly tribes, helped European settlements survive. As they grew stronger, European colonies engaged in diplomacy and formed alliances with larger Indigenous confederacies such as the Iroquois. When Europeans and Indigenous Americans fought, either with or against one another, the battles often assumed a mixed character: Indigenous-inspired raids and ambushes combined with European-style sieges. King Philip’s War had all of these features.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: