49 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Nooyi immediately loved working for PepsiCo, which she describes as “ambitious, friendly, and fun” (130). Nevertheless, her workload was intense, and she had little time to enjoy the company’s sprawling campus and gardens. Nooyi compares PepsiCo to a three-legged stool, with fast-food restaurants, soda drinks, and snack foods each representing a different division, or “leg,” of the company. In 1994, there were no women among the company’s senior executives, who were all white men. Nooyi respected these executives for their intellect and contributions but could see that PepsiCo, like other big companies, neglected to promote women to the highest-level jobs. Nooyi was an outsider in this environment because she was deeply involved in her family life and parenting in addition to her work, unlike her male colleagues. At this point, Nooyi was very accustomed to being the only immigrant, woman, and person of color in her workplace, and she generally felt welcomed by her new colleagues.
With PepsiCo’s restaurant division floundering, Nooyi worked closely with Roger Enrico, evaluating the quality and locations of their restaurants across the country. The two believed that supporting their best restauranteurs and managers to improve customer service and restaurant quality was the key to success, and profits began to climb after they reformed their system.
Concerned with the lack of ethnic and national diversity in PepsiCo, especially with the company expanding to international markets, Nooyi pressed the recruiting team to hire more employees from different backgrounds. After two years with the company, Nooyi agreed to move to London to oversee the Western European Snacks division. However, Roger Enrico took over as the company CEO and reversed the decision, leaving Nooyi worried that her career growth would be stunted by staying in the same position. She felt that, as a woman, she had to outperform her male colleagues to receive the same opportunities.
Nooyi found the financial aspect of her work particularly challenging, as her predictions for the company’s profits were more accurate than the division heads, putting her at odds with them. When these executives were rude or dismissive to her, Nooyi felt unsupported by her colleagues, including CEO Enrico. Frustrated, Nooyi informed Enrico that she was quitting because of the lack of support. Soon after, they had another meeting, and Nooyi found that everyone was suddenly supportive. Feeling more appreciated and motivated, she decided to stay with the company.
Nooyi persuaded the other executives that the restaurant division needed to split from PepsiCo and become its own company, which is now called YUM! Brands. Another major feat at this time was Nooyi’s analysis of Coca-Cola’s stock price, which she discovered was “unsustainable” (147). After copying Coca-Cola’s approach to selling their soda syrups to independent bottlers, PepsiCo’s profits increased. Nooyi became more familiar with complex investment banking and dealmaking, and she played a large role in the company’s acquisition of Tropicana. Nooyi wanted the company to explore healthier food options and even hired a nutrition board for a while, but other executives resisted her ideas.
During these busy years, Nooyi had a grueling work schedule and missed out on healthy routines around exercise, sleep, and time with her kids. Her relationship with her children suffered, and she felt guilty that she did not have quality time with them. Even though she and Raj were both high earners, Nooyi felt she had to work at her demanding job because of house costs, private tuition costs, and ambitious financial goals for retirement and the children.
At this time, Enrico appointed Nooyi to become chief financial officer of the company, a position she was reluctant to hold as she was so overworked already. Nooyi and her family suffered because of the inflexibility of her work routine. She argues that now, especially with more remote work options available, companies should allow people’s schedules and work arrangements to be as flexible as possible. After Nooyi played a large role in PepsiCo’s acquisition of the Quaker Oats Company, Enrico promoted her to the president of PepsiCo with a seat on the board, a position Nooyi was thrilled to accept.
Nooyi was very pleased with the acquisition of the Quaker Oats Company. Not only did this bring under the PepsiCo umbrella the very profitable Gatorade, one of Quaker’s companies, but it also helped Nooyi see a healthier future for PepsiCo where nutrition innovation would be welcome. Enrico stepped down as CEO and was replaced by Steve Reinemund, who was known for his religious devotion, frugality, and dedication to his family. One of Nooyi’s new challenges was to make PepsiCo’s packaging and delivery cheaper, since even cutting costs by fractions of a cent per product added up to significant savings for the company. By the end of this project, Nooyi and her team had saved PepsiCo $700 million over the course of five years.
At this time, Reinemund gave Nooyi a new office and a significant pay increase, as well as stock options with the company. She realized later that she had been paid less than her similar-level male colleagues, and that HR had knowingly continued this practice. The author ponders how this form of sexism continues today and shares her frustration with women being under-compensated for doing the same work as male colleagues.
Nooyi reflects on the constant demands of family life and her ongoing guilt that she missed many of her daughters’ everyday routines. However, once she was allowed to fly on a private company plane, this allowed her to travel more efficiently and spend more time at home. She also prioritized being with her kids if they were sick or injured. Her assistant, Barbara, was particularly helpful and became a “part of our family” (175). Nooyi reveals that once she considered quitting her job at PepsiCo to spend more time with her daughters, but they urged her to continue working toward her career goals, even though they missed her. Nooyi’s husband and friends were supportive of her career, which helped her stay motivated and eased her guilt about being busy with work.
During her time as president, Nooyi had to evaluate and approve a massive $1.5 billion IT overhaul for PepsiCo, whose technology was quickly becoming outdated and unreliable. Nooyi worked nonstop over the holidays to understand the IT systems and make the right decision. She urges other executives to always understand the details of what they approve or disapprove, rather than relying on others’ advice.
Nooyi argues that there is a double standard for women and men in professional life. She recalls worrying that she would be judged as arrogant if she spoke too much about her responsibilities or celebrated her successes too publicly. She was disrespected by “simple, little slights,” such as being referred to by her first name while her colleagues were spoken to formally (183). She felt pressured to maintain a high standard of appearance and had her fashion choices criticized.
Nooyi was surprised when Steve Reinemund retired as CEO and informed her that the board had selected her as his successor. While she was excited at the thought of leading PepsiCo and influencing its new products and work culture, Nooyi also “felt the weight of the job” and that “reality was taking hold” (188).
A nervous and “over prepared” Nooyi began her work as CEO, aware that people within and outside PepsiCo were carefully evaluating her. She became more wary of the press, disappointed that her identity as an Indian and a woman was sensationalized in the media. She recognized that she was a “curiosity,” since she was one of very few women leading a Fortune 500 company, and wished that journalists would cover her career and personality more accurately instead of creating a caricature of a “zany outsider” (193).
Nooyi hired a new personal assistant, who stayed with her for her whole tenure as CEO. She also continued the practice of having a new chief of staff every eighteen months. They traveled with her, arranged meetings and roundtables, and advised her on speeches and presentations. Nooyi generally felt warmly welcomed as CEO, but she knew that she also had critics who vocally questioned her promotion.
Finally, at the head of the company, Nooyi felt she had to steer it in a new direction. She was concerned about governments and public health officials discouraging junk food and soda, which remained a mainstay of the PepsiCo product line. While they had introduced some healthy initiatives, this did little to change people’s perceptions of the company. She was also concerned and embarrassed about PepsiCo’s role in producing landfill and ocean waste, as well as how the production process used two and a half gallons of water to only create one gallon of soda.
In response, Nooyi came up with her Performance with Purpose plan, or PwP. PwP would help PepsiCo to “nourish” consumers, “replenish” environmental resources, and “cherish” employees to foster their skills and talent. While some were reluctant to back this plan, Nooyi convinced them that her plan was not to merely give money away but to transform how PepsiCo did business. This would ensure its long-term viability as a company and honor its responsibility as a powerful corporation.
Nooyi believes that companies should operate ethically and contribute to society. She was pleased when division heads at PepsiCo approved of her ideas and knew that younger employees were happy with the changes she wanted to make. Shareholders, however, were more concerned, since they thought that Nooyi’s initiatives would decrease profitability.
Nooyi hired Mehmood Khan, the president of a pharmaceutical company, to join PepsiCo and create new products and healthier versions of their original snacks. In a speech to other business leaders, she urged them to take responsibility for the nutrition of their products, asking everyone to help solve obesity-related health problems. Under her leadership, PepsiCo purchased healthier food companies, which offered dairy and juice products.
She also turned her attention to optimizing water usage. This endeavor was a huge success: The company saved 16 billion liters of water in five years and won the Stockholm Water Prize. Nooyi believes that private industry should work with the government to affect positive change in society, and that companies like PepsiCo have a unique opportunity to do so.
When Nooyi returned to India to visit relatives, she was happy that her mother’s friends congratulated her on raising a successful child. She decided to write thank you letters to the parents and spouses of some of her employees as a part of her mission to “cherish” PepsiCo’s talent. She loved corresponding with staff and their families this way.
One enjoyable aspect of Nooyi’s job was evaluating PepsiCo products and consumer behavior. She realized that while PepsiCo had made their food healthier, she also understood why the younger generation was choosing local brands and sugar-free products. She also became more concerned about making PepsiCo products more accessible to older people; for example, large crates of sodas and tight bottle caps are inconveniences for many people. She collaborated with the MIT Age Lab to understand how labeling, shelf position, and fonts all inform the consumer experience for older people.
Nooyi was inspired by a meeting with Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple, in which he shared the importance of design in every aspect of a product. When she asked her executives to create albums based on good design, many of them were uninterested. Nooyi wondered how to incorporate better design into PepsiCo products and packaging. She later hired Mauro Porcini, an Italian designer who had worked for 3M, and agreed to open the PepsiCo Design and Innovation Center in New York. Nooyi was pleased when this new project paid off, and the NBA and the WNBA agreed to have PepsiCo as their official brand and marketing partner.
At this time, Nooyi was interested in planning for the future by fostering the talent of PepsiCo executives and making sure that someone was ready to be CEO when she eventually stepped down. She reaped the benefits of her IT overhaul since the company had better access to information from its headquarters around the globe, which facilitated the sharing of data and ideas. She also decided to spend more on advertising for Pepsi and Mountain Dew. Nooyi helped to encourage work-life balance by renovating the PepsiCo headquarters to include childcare spaces and preschools for PepsiCo staff families.
One challenge for Nooyi was dealing with “activist investors” who wanted to leverage their influence as stockholders. She remembers respectfully disagreeing with these billionaire investors and proudly shares that they later sold their stocks at a profit. After nearly a decade at the helm of PepsiCo, Nooyi felt “vindicated” by the achievements of PwP and the overall success of the company.
Nooyi fondly remembers the most notable of her international trips, such as traveling with President Barack Obama to a US-India forum and traveling to South Africa to meet Nelson Mandela and announce a PepsiCo partnership with the Nelson Mandela Foundation. After twelve years as CEO, Nooyi decided that it was time to retire from the position. She selected one of the four executives she had mentored, Ramon Laguarta, to take her place, and the board agreed. After an emotional goodbye and speech, Nooyi left the PepsiCo offices.
In these chapters, Nooyi continues to develop her discussion on work-life balance as she enumerates the personal sacrifices she made to fulfill her ambitions at work. She explains her dedication by writing: “Time was the most critical currency in my life, and I spent almost all of it on PepsiCo. To succeed among the ideal workers, I had to be one myself” (153). She describes the guilt she often felt as she missed her daughters’ daily routines and special events, describing how she felt like she could either be a successful mother or a successful businesswoman—not both. This is a struggle that men implicitly don’t grapple with to the same degree: Their quality as a parent is based more on professional and financial success, whereas women are expected to be attentive mothers central to the home. Nooyi wanted to break free from these expectations, but filling both professional and domestic roles was draining, particularly when many in her company and the media wanted her to fail. She remembers how “sometimes [she] felt like a punching bag, with everyone’s troubles attributed to [her] being a top executive at PepsiCo” (180). Trying to overcome restrictive expectations for women—and in the case of her career, women of color specifically—left her feeling criticized from all sides. Her decision to prioritize her work was not without consequences, as Nooyi felt that her commitment to her job strained her relationship with her children.
These anecdotes reinforce Nooyi’s argument that employers should take more initiative in helping employees achieve a healthy work-life balance, since her own imbalance affected her relationships and mental health, even leading her to consider quitting her job. PepsiCo did have a “work-share” program at this time, in which two employees could work part-time at one job. However, Nooyi remembers that only junior employees took part, which she attributes to executives like herself being afraid of the “flexibility stigma”—the fear that reducing one’s hours would negatively affect one’s career (153). Her discussion on this topic helps to confront such a stigma and suggests that initiatives like this could help improve employees’ lives. Her stories also encourage reflection on one’s own priorities and how professional and personal time is spent. For Nooyi, considering this balance is crucial, but she also coaches others to recognize that there will likely never be an exact balance, writing, “I know it’s easier said than done, but we really need to let go of perfection” (179).
Nooyi also devotes many pages in this passage to developing her theme of The Value of Women in the Workforce. In discussing her rise from executive to CEO at PepsiCo, Nooyi recounts her personal feelings and experiences as one of the few women working at that level of the company. While Nooyi had a powerful seat at the table, she also felt that she had to prove herself more than her male colleagues. She explains, “I also knew, as a woman, I had to outdo the men” (142). Her wariness was substantiated when she later learned that she had been making less money than male colleagues at her level, who had been offered valuable stock options along with their salaries. She notes how men were offered different, more generous stock options when hired than she was, and she questions why this became acceptable behavior perpetuated by HR. Despite her outstanding performance, she was still unable to attain the same benefits as men for a long time. By relaying her own experience of gender-based pay discrimination, Nooyi provides the reader with some insight into how prevalent this facet of discrimination is in many workplaces; she then uses her experience as a foundation for her argument that companies must prioritize pay parity. Despite these unfair standards, she demonstrates how gender bias forced her to outperform others, bringing PepsiCo into a new era and benefitting them financially.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Asian American & Pacific Islander...
View Collection
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection