51 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Beau Donaldson is arrested for raping Allison Huguet. Donaldson’s crime becomes a focal point for the media, drawing attention to the broader issue of sexual assaults involving University of Montana students. The media coverage escalates when more survivors come forward, sharing harrowing experiences of sexual assault that often involve members of the university’s football team. Despite the serious allegations, university officials, including President Royce Engstrom, initially downplay the connection between the football team and the sexual assault crisis. However, as more cases surface and public outrage grows, Engstrom is forced to confront the issue more directly, leading to investigations and the release of the Barz Report, which highlights the urgent need for action and the pervasive culture of denial and victim-blaming in Missoula, particularly when it comes to allegations against popular athletes.
Cecilia Washburn is a junior at the University of Montana at the time of her alleged rape by Jordan Johnson, the school’s star quarterback. Initially hesitant to involve law enforcement, Washburn seeks medical care at the First Step Resource Center, where she undergoes a forensic exam. Despite her reluctance, she ultimately decides to report the assault to the university but not to the police, fearing media exposure. The university immediately launches an investigation, which shakes Johnson, leading him to seek reassurance from his football coach, Robin Pflugrad. As the investigation progresses, Washburn’s fear intensifies, culminating in her filing a restraining order against Johnson after a chance encounter on campus. This restraining order is later replaced by a civil no-contact order, allowing Johnson to resume football practice, much to the dismay of Washburn’s attorney. The situation escalates further when the story breaks in the media, sparking public outcry and further complicating the already tense atmosphere in Missoula.
Rumors begin to circulate that Donaldson previously attempted to rape another woman, Hillary McLaughlin, in 2008. Initially, McLaughlin chose not to report the assault, opting instead to try to move past the traumatic experience. However, after hearing about Donaldson’s arrest on the news, McLaughlin is compelled to come forward with the harrowing story of her assault, recognizing that she has been living with the unresolved trauma for years and hoping to prevent further assaults by Donaldson.
After Donaldson is released on bail, the prosecution, led by Deputy County Attorney Shaun Donovan, engages in lengthy plea negotiations with Donaldson’s defense attorney, Milt Datsopoulos. Despite Donaldson’s confession, the Huguet family grows increasingly concerned that Donovan might agree to a lenient sentence, allowing Donaldson to serve minimal time in a minimum-security facility rather than face a harsher penalty at the state penitentiary. Donovan appears reluctant to push for a severe sentence and evinces a dismissive attitude toward the Huguet family’s desire for justice. Navigating the complexities of the legal system takes an emotional toll on Allison Huguet, who feels betrayed by a prosecutor who seems more sympathetic to the defendant than to her as the survivor. The tension escalates as Donovan and the Huguet family clash over the potential outcomes of the case, with Donovan emphasizing the challenges of securing a conviction while the Huguets demand accountability for Donaldson’s actions.
While Huguet managed to repress much of the trauma from the rape initially, the constant reminders and public scrutiny after Donaldson’s arrest intensify her anxiety, paranoia, and nightmares. Despite widespread rumors accusing her of lying and seeking attention, Huguet remains resolute in her pursuit of justice, though the stress significantly affects her mental health.
Huguet, feeling increasingly unsupported by Deputy Prosecutor Shaun Donovan, particularly struggles with a proposed plea deal, which she finds too lenient given the severity of Donaldson’s crime. Eventually, Huguet and her family express their dissatisfaction directly to County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg, leading to a heated exchange that results in Van Valkenburg taking over the case personally.
Johnson’s legal defense, led by prominent attorney David Paoli, aggressively contests the university’s investigation and disciplinary process. Paoli employs private investigators and mounts a vigorous defense, challenging the university’s use of the “preponderance of evidence” standard, which the US Department of Education mandates in sexual assault cases. Despite initial findings by Dean Charles Couture that support Washburn’s allegations, Paoli’s legal maneuvers ultimately lead to Johnson’s expulsion being overturned by Montana Commissioner of Higher Education Clayton Christian. Johnson is reinstated as a student and athlete, a decision that brings relief to his supporters but disillusionment to those advocating for accountability.
Part 3 takes an investigative approach to expose the many ways in which institutions mishandle sexual assault cases, particularly when perpetrators hold positions of privilege. Chapters 11 through 16 particularly focus on The Dynamics of Sexual Assault Cases in the Legal System, highlighting how difficult it is for survivors to navigate the process of seeking justice, especially when faced with societal judgment and institutional resistance.
As in prior sections, Krakauer blends personal narrative with more journalistic reporting—in this case, on the technicalities of legal proceedings. He allows survivors to speak for themselves in accounts that appeal to the readers’ emotions while simultaneously documenting the failures of the institutions meant to protect them. This blend of pathos and logos allows Krakauer to highlight the injustice of the legal process without sensationalizing the survivors’ trauma. For example, when Huguet reflects, “I see now why most girls who’ve been raped don’t go forward with pressing charges” (184), Krakauer captures the emotional toll of the process. This moment underscores how survivors often feel alienated and discouraged by the very system that should protect them, reinforcing the theme of Victim Advocacy and the Challenges Faced by Survivors.
Krakauer’s juxtaposition of survivors’ personal stories with accounts of their cases’ legal developments also emphasizes the gap between survivors’ lived experiences and the impersonal, bureaucratic mechanisms of the legal system. By juxtaposing the raw emotions of Huguet and Washburn with the cold negotiations of legal professionals, Krakauer highlights how disconnected survivors feel from the justice they seek. In Chapter 14, for instance, Krakauer details the plea deal negotiations for Donaldson, noting, “The case would be resolved with a plea deal and would never go to trial. But as the case crept forward [...] the Huguet family worried that [Donaldson] would avoid prison time altogether” (177). This passage illustrates the slow-moving and often frustrating nature of legal negotiations, which prioritize expediency and convenience over justice for survivors.
Krakauer strengthens his critique by incorporating references to research and expert opinions, lending credibility to his argument. In Chapter 13, Krakauer references the work of David Lisak, a psychologist known for his research on serial rapists, stating, “Persuading a jury to convict a serial rapist is a lot easier than convicting someone who’s under suspicion for committing only a single rape” (169). This reference supports Krakauer’s broader argument that legal systems are inherently biased in favor of apparent first-time offenders, even though many are likely to be repeat offenders. By including this expert analysis, Krakauer critiques the legal system’s reluctance to aggressively prosecute sexual assault cases, thereby reinforcing the theme of The Role of Institutions in Perpetuating or Combating Rape Culture. The failure to treat these cases with the seriousness they deserve contributes to a culture of impunity for rapists.
Krakauer’s use of language remains a key element of his critique. His language is straightforward but emotionally inflected, particularly when the institutional failings are most evident. In Chapter 16, Krakauer writes, “When Washburn realized that a private investigator was snooping into her personal life, she called Dean Couture to express her shock and revulsion” (199). The word choices here—“shock” and “revulsion”—underscore the deep sense of violation Washburn felt, not only from the assault but also from the aggressive defense tactics used to discredit her. Krakauer’s use of language emphasizes the emotional impact of these events while also highlighting the lengths to which institutions will go to protect their reputations rather than the survivors.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Jon Krakauer
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
Journalism Reads
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
True Crime & Legal
View Collection