20 pages • 40 minutes read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
“Little Beast” (2005) puts Siken in conversation with an array of contemporary gay male poets, who, at around this time, addressed the intersection of desire and violence (what Glück’s intro to the book calls “purgatorial recklessness”). Seven years earlier, D. A. Powell published his first collection of poetry, Tea (Wesleyan University Press, 1998). As with Siken’s poem, Powell’s poetry confronts lust, harm, and destruction. “[D]ead boys make the best lovers,” Powell declares in one of the poems in Tea. A few years after Crush came out, Ronaldo Wilson’s second book, Poems of the Black Object (Futurepoem Books, 2009), explored the link between being gay, sex, exploitation, and degradation.
Yet Powell’s poems center on the AIDS crisis, and Wilson’s poems confront racial issues. Siken’s poem doesn’t directly address a specific social or political event, which adds to the poem’s elusive and mysterious quality. By its very existence, however, it not only adds to a long line of poetry about being gay, but it also underscores that even seemingly mundane events like a barbeque or a house party can be ripe for the politics of sex and desire and the social aspect of who determines what is acceptable in society and what isn’t.
For centuries, gay and queer male poets have had to convey their relationships with subterfuge due to intolerance, exclusion, and anti-gay activists. In "The Foolish Virgin" (A Season in Hell, 1873), for instance, the French poet Arthur Rimbaud recorded his violent relationship with the older French poet Paul Verlaine by turning Verlaine into a tormented widow and himself into a devilish bridegroom. Graham Robb, a contemporary Rimbaud biographer, says being gay attracted Rimbaud because, at that time, it was mysterious: “There wasn’t even a word for it in the language,” says Robb. “This blank space on the social map was a powerful invitation” (Rimbaud: A Biography, W. W. Norton, 2001). Despite this promising “blank map,” both Rimbaud and Verlaine’s reputations were affected by actions and rumors of “illicit” love, a love that scandalized the Parisian literary community. Similarly, in “Little Beast,” existing in a liminal space captivates the male lovers. For most of the poem, their bodies are too propulsive for domestication. Siken even says that the lover “only felt good while moving” (Line 33). Untamed and animalistic, history leaves out their names, thus denying their humanity.
Like many of the poems in Crush, an ex-boyfriend who died inspired “Little Beast.” Siken admits this in one of his few interviews, but he doesn’t expand upon how the former partner specifically impacted the poems. As the man allegedly died in the early 1990s, he could have died from AIDS, a widespread epidemic at the time with a disproportionate impact on gay men. According to the Center for Disease Control’s website, the epidemic, with cases first recorded in the US in June 1981, ballooned during the 1990s with a greater presence among minority communities and gay men (“HIV and AIDS—United States, 1981-2000”). We now know that the disease can and does affect anyone. Its devastation was and still is global. If Siken’s ex-boyfriend did die during the epidemic, it’s a moot historic topic for Siken himself. Such a contention doesn’t amount to much besides speculation anyway; besides, the lack of personal information about Siken and his past bolsters his own opinion that a reader shouldn’t have to know about the specifics of a poet’s life to appreciate their poems. The only major purpose of speculation in this vein is to pay homage to those who died, those remembered, and those whose names are lost to history like the speaker and his lovers’ names in Line 15 of “Little Beast.”
In an interview with Bomb Magazine (2011), Siken discusses an exchange of emails between him and a high school student studying a poem from Crush. Siken says he told the teen that “if she needed my explanations and my biography to help her understand it—to feel it—then the poem was a failure and I had wasted my life.” The student called Siken “rude” and blamed him when she received a B on her assignment. For Siken, the exchange reflects his view that the need for privacy isn’t about shame but about the belief that the poem should stand on its own.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: