49 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Abrashoff assumed command of the USS Benfold in 1997, a tenure that lasted for 20 months. He recounts his Naval career and the various roles he had occupied prior to becoming captain of the ship at the beginning of the book. Most notably, Abrashoff was the Executive Officer of the USS Shiloh, where he says he learned how to be an effective leader by seeing what not to do. While his time on Shiloh had practical value because of his job responsibilities, the theoretical knowledge of what leaders should do and how they should behave was clarified because of what he saw as evidence of the shortcomings of a traditional top-down command style.
Abrashoff is proud of what he accomplished during his tenure as captain of the Benfold, but he also wants the reader to connect personal achievement with collective achievement. Abrashoff contends that his success as a captain was entirely dependent on the success of the ship, a fact that could not have been achieved had it not been for a collective effort. In this way, he describes a reciprocal loop. Good leadership leads to good results that can only be achieved by collective effort, which is best achieved through good leadership.
Abrashoff’s last dinner aboard the Benfold is a microcosm of his leadership style while captain of the ship. He was unafraid to do things in a new way, and he wanted to be considered an equal to his crew, not above them. Abrashoff left the Navy after his tenure aboard the Benfold, noting that he had spent his entire adult life to that point in the Navy. He forged a new career as a leadership consultant, public speaker, and writer, and now lectures often on the playbook that he outlines within this book.
A former United States Secretary of Defense, Perry was Abrashoff’s boss who influenced his leadership style. Abrashoff served as a military aide to Perry and considers the Defense Secretary to be the finest leader he had ever met. While speaking of his successful tenure as captain of the Benfold, Abrashoff credits much of his leadership style to Perry, a role model outside of his family who provided a positive model of leadership. He claims to have received an education while simply watching Perry at work in his role as Defense Secretary. Specifically, Abrashoff learned from Perry the importance of active listening as it relates to leadership. Of Perry’s ability to make people feel heard and listened to, Abrashoff says, “Each person who talked to him had his complete, undivided attention. Everyone blossomed in his presence, because he was so respectful, and I realized I wanted to affect people the same way” (54). While Abrashoff admits that his own listening skills were not as good as he wanted them to be, he often would recall this particular skill Perry demonstrated and he would use it to inform his own approach to communication while captain of the Benfold. Another skill that Abrashoff learned from Perry was to harness the power of language: “If leaders back their words with action, if they practice what they preach, their words create a self-fulfilling prophecy” (61). Abrashoff borrows a portion of the subtitle of this book, “The Best Damn Ship in the Navy,” from Perry’s remarks about the US Navy as “the best damn Navy in the world” (61). Abrashoff creates the catch phrase, which becomes the ship’s mantra and create an ideal that the crew strives to achieve.
Rafalko was a Radioman First Class during Abrashoff’s tenure on the Benfold. Abrashoff credits Rafalko with figuring out how to operate a new communication system that had yet to be deployed. Amazingly, during a 1997 crisis in Iraq, the Navy fleet in the Persian Gulf was still using an outdated and overwhelmed communication system. With such high stakes, communication problems were potentially catastrophic. Rafalko mentioned to Abrashoff that he had read all the manuals on the new system and offered to teach the rest of the fleet in the Persian Gulf. Eventually, he did so, and a possible communications crisis was avoided. Abrashoff mentions the anecdote to further illustrate his point that a leader needs to have an open line of communication with every member of his crew. Rather than look down at Rafalko as a subordinate, Abrashoff says, “My only role in this saga was to listen to Rafalko, appreciate his idea, and do my best to press it once I was convinced it was a good one” (69). The story shows the value that trust has within an organization. When the crisis in the Persian Gulf ended, Abrashoff insisted on bringing Rafalko with him to discuss the circumstances with high-level, senior officers, because it was his idea. Rafalko, meanwhile, after leaving the Benfold was enlisted “to help ensure state-of-the-art communications for the president of the United States” (69).
Fargo was a three-star commander of the Persian Gulf’s Fifth Fleet, and Abrashoff reported directly to Fargo during this time. In effect, Fargo was his immediate superior and boss. Many of Abrashoff’s innovations in leadership were eventually approved of by Fargo, though oftentimes after the fact. Abrashoff paints Fargo as a very serious man, but one who is open to new ideas. As an example, Abrashoff tells a story of how he rented vans for his crew’s shore leave while stationed in Dubai. This was against Navy policy, as sailors were required to use buses. When Fargo asks Abrashoff about the vans, Abrashoff gave the full explanation, which centered on safety concerns and comfort. Abrashoff then asked that the regulations be changed, and Fargo followed through and the regulations were changed. Rather than chew out Abrashoff for breaking Navy policy, he saw the merit in the decision and, because of the way the ship had been performing, understood how it improved crew morale.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: