31 pages 1 hour read

Hunger

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3, Chapters 30-41 Summary

Gay describes her twenties as a difficult decade because she gravitated toward people who disrespected her; she did not think she deserved better treatment. Her family continued to worry about her body and express concerns about her health. Their insistence on weight loss caused Gay to refuse—punishment for their “failure” to accept her. In truth, she was inflicting punishment on herself.

Gay notes that “When you’re overweight, your body becomes a matter of public record in many respects” (120). People treat those with fat bodies as if they are ignorant and unaware of themselves. Some people frame this behavior as being concerned for a person who happens to be fat, forgetting that human beings are much more than their physical forms. Public alarm over America’s “obesity epidemic,” fatphobic reality shows like The Biggest Loser, and advertising for fat-free and low-calorie foods that specifically target women all exemplify this attitude: “What does it say about our culture that the desire for weight loss is considered a default feature of womanhood?” (137).

Celebrated talk show host Oprah Winfrey and her struggle to lose weight embody this “default feature” for women. In 2015, Winfrey purchased a 10 percent stake in the company Weight Watchers despite being “the woman who brought us the idea of living our best life, of becoming our most authentic selves” (138). Even though Winfrey is in her sixties and by most means successful, she still internalized “damaging cultural messages about unruly bodies” (139). For many, happiness and thinness are inherently (and perpetually) linked. There is an “economy of thinness” (142) that allows celebrities (and people in general) to be considered more “beautiful,” relevant, and worthy when they are thin.

Gay asserts that there is a vernacular “taxonomy for the unruly, overweight human body” (143). For example, we label some clothing “plus size” and refer to certain body parts in a derogatory fashion, like “thunder thighs” and “muffin tops” (143-44). This terminology is intended to punish—to remind fat people that they are “abnormal” and “problematic.” Thus, people of all sizes resort to disciplining their bodies via denial (of clothing choices, eating habits, space and spaces, etc.) in order to be accepted by others. Gay shares an example of this mentality: Before boarding a plane, a friend offered her some potato chips to take on the flight as a snack. Gay refused, as modern society does not permit people of size to eat foods deemed unhealthy in public spaces (at least, not without judgement on either party’s behalf).

Furthermore, modern society expects people like Gay to despise themselves because of their bodies. However, Gay does not. Though she would like to change her appearance and society’s reaction to those who are fat (as this is the true problem), she does not wish to change her personality.

Part 3 Analysis

Part 3 of Gay’s memoir focuses on her emotionally abusive relationships, her family’s concern with her size, and society’s poor treatment of those living in fat bodies. She highlights the negativity associated with the word “fat,” an adjective often wielded as an insult. Whenever Gay acknowledges that she is fat, her well-meaning friends always deny it. Others use the word as a slur deliberately meant to harm people of size whom they assume to be lazy—and thus worthy of cruelty, disdain, and ostracism. Likewise, there is an extensive vocabulary or “taxonomy” that applies specifically to fat bodies—including words intended to shield people from shame (“curvy”) and weaponized ones intended to harm (“fat ass”). The fashion industry and everyday speech use terms like “plus size” as well. There is no such taxonomy for thin people as thinness is considered “normal” or even ideal. In other words, fatphobic language is meant to remind people of size that something is inherently wrong with them.

Modern society’s obsession with weight has led to our unhealthy relationship with media, with shows like The Biggest Loser publicizing extreme weight loss. The very name of the show has a double meaning: It references losing weight and also implies that the fat contestants are unworthy of belonging unless they do so.

Oprah Winfrey, a daytime television icon, embodies a default-related paradox (as it applies to women). She has highlighted and praised weight loss on her show and bought stock in the company Weight Watchers, while also encouraging her audience to embrace who they are. Gay notes that Oprah “is telling us that our ultimate goal is this better (th)inner woman we’re supposed to diet toward” (140), not who we are inside and out.

Our society, one that uses words and culture to harm, is the real problem—not fat people. Gay ends this section on a defiant note: Though society would have her hate herself because of what she looks like, she rejects this impulse in favor of liking who she is.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 31 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools