61 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In How the Light Gets In, Penny examines how appearances often distort the truth. Only by digging past the surface can the truth about people be uncovered—for better or worse.
Solving Constance’s murder relies on uncovering her family’s secret. Because the Ouellet quintuplets are celebrities, everyone thinks that they know the girls through the news stories about their lives. When Gamache accesses the hidden archives, he uncovers a different story, “Not the one for public consumption, but their private lives. Their real lives when the cameras turned off” (95). The midwife and parents that delivered the babies were made to look like simpletons while the government’s selected doctor took credit for the miracle birth. Everyone thought the girls had a happy life—even Ruth Zardo, hardly an optimist, thought “they always seemed so happy, so carefree” (147). In reality, the girls were rehearsed and coached into seeming happy. When Gamache watches an unedited reel of footage, he sees dozens of takes where the girls are forced to exit the home, smiling and waving. While the successful take is what was shown to the public, in the majority of the takes, the girls are banging on the door, begging to be let back in. To get to the truth of the murder—a hidden brother—Gamache has to question the entire narrative that the world believes about the Ouellet Quints.
Francoeur and Renard’s plan is also hidden by years of planning. Like a chameleon, Francoeur makes himself appealing to whomever he is with, never revealing his true identity. Penny writes: “He could quote Chaucer and Tintin, in either educated French or broad joual. He’d order poutine for lunch and foie gras for dinner. He was all things. To all people. He was everything and he was nothing” (187). This ability to shapeshift means that no one suspects Francoeur of wrongdoing. Because he can please whoever is in front of him, he doesn’t appear sinister or power hungry. Similarly, Renard goes years without revealing his desire for Québec to declare independence from Canada. While others are in the dark, Audrey Villeneuve realizes that evil people don’t always appear like grotesque monsters. “Monsters existed. They lived in cracks in tunnels, and in dark alleys, and in neat row houses. They had names like Frankenstein and Dracula, and Martha and David and Pierre. And you almost always found them where you least expected” (2). Just as Gamache has to question the way that the Ouellet quintuplets were portrayed to the world, he has to look past appearances to understand what was really happening between Francoeur and Renard.
Just as appearances might hide villains, they can also hide heroes. For the entire series, Yvette Nichol has been presented as a self-serving, petulant agent. While Gamache suspects that she might have leaked the video of the factory raid (which largely contributed to the development of Beauvoir’s addiction), he doesn’t realize that she did it to clear his reputation. Nichol risks her life to help Gamache.
Similarly, many other who help Gamache do not appear mighty at first. Thérèse Brunel is an aging officer like Gamache, and Jérôme is a retired physician, not a master hacker. Their only other companions are the villagers. An artist, shop owners, and old poet don’t seem like a match for Sûreté agents—which is what allows them to overtake some of Francoeur’s men, who underestimate their bravery and abilities. Thérèse Brunel walks straight past one of the agents who assumes she’s just an old woman. This shows that while appearances might hide evil, they can also disguise good. Just as Gamache finds killers in plain sight, “disguised as everyone else” (118), the greatest heroes are not always superheroes—sometimes they are also disguised as everyone else.
How the Light Gets In examines the contrast between a life lived in isolation versus with a community. Characters who embrace one another are able to weather life’s difficulties together, while characters who choose to be alone decline without support. Penny suggests that in the light of others, evil is kept at bay, while it grows slowly in seclusion. Community, embodied through Three Pines and Gamache’s department, strengthens characters and helps them heal.
In Penny’s novel, life in hiding amplifies pain and distorts reality, causing otherwise good people to become corrupt or complicit in evil. Constance Ouellet’s isolation started out as a form of protection to keep her, and her siblings sheltered from the public eye. Over time, privacy became an obsession, keeping them from forming connection and processing their experience with others. People never get to know the real Constance, even if she comes across as friendly: “There was a veneer over her. A sort of lacquer. It was as though she was already a portrait. Something created, but not real” (148). The Quints were never allowed to have friends because of their celebrity, something that affects Constance’s relationships into adulthood. When her other sisters died, Constance was left to remember the murder of Virginie and their hidden brother, André, alone. Her brother André is also isolated in their family’s home. Now that his parents have passed away, he has nothing but his bitter memories to keep him company. Gamache has warned the reader about what being alone with nasty emotions can do to a person–it can drive them to murder. Her family’s hidden secrets are what truly kill Constance. Her brother murders her for trying to break through her isolation and share her experience with Myrna.
While Constance dies before she is able to tell Myrna about her secret, she has made changes thanks to the community at Three Pines. When she arrives, she is stiff and keeps others at a distance. So accustomed to secrecy, she finds Clara’s opening up about her separation indecent, like “parading around in her underwear” (9). The warmth of the community wins her over. By the time she comes back for Christmas, she has knitted Clara, Olivier, and Gabri personalized scarves, just as her mother made hats for her and her siblings. By imitating her mother’s gesture of care, Constance shows that she was learning to get over her isolation. She makes a reference to her brother, André, and gives Myrna his hat. While these clues might not seem like she’s opening up, for someone as secretive as Constance, this is a profound act of communication.
Similarly, isolation from community exacerbates Beauvoir’s cycles of addiction, and Penny posits that community provides a form of accountability. Gamache kept Beauvoir accountable for his addiction and other actions, whereas Tessier and Francoeur use them to keep him more isolated and therefore vulnerable to their manipulation. Since Gamache left him on the floor of the factory to pursue the terrorists in a raid, Beauvoir has struggled with abandonment. He feels that he isn’t worth saving. While Beauvoir longs for connection, he counterintuitively cuts himself off from his loving relationships out of shame and fear. Beauvoir has no one to comfort him or to help him and turns to substance use for solace instead. When the other agents leave, he buries his head in his hands and cries in fear. When Gamache tries to convince Beauvoir to come with him, he says, ““How lonely you must be” (271), a phrase that almost breaks through Beauvoir’s defenses.
What finally allows Beauvoir to heal is to open himself up to the love and connection that he has rejected. At the beginning of the novel, he shrinks from Henri’s kiss, a gesture of love. Not until Ruth Zardo, the old poet who had struck up a friendship with Beauvoir, gives him her beloved pet duck, Rosa, does Beauvoir allow himself to reconsider his assumptions about how others feel about him. While Ruth could have sworn at Beauvoir or made fun of him, she shows him how much she cares by giving him something so precious to her and comforting him that some people take the long road home: “They seem lost. Sometimes they might even head off in the wrong direction. Lots of people give up, say they’re gone forever, but I don’t believe that” (379). This breaks through Beauvoir’s emotional barriers and allows him to feel the weight of the love others have for him.
Throughout the novel, isolation and secrecy are a breeding ground for destruction. The Ouellet’s secrecy deprives the children of connection into adulthood, and ultimately kills Constance. Beauvoir’s inability to open himself up to others drives him to addiction and complicity in corruption. Penny posits that the only antidote for isolation is community. As Constance and Beauvoir open themselves up to others, they show that healing comes by shedding light on wounds rather than hiding them.
Through contrasting Gamache and Francoeur, Penny shows that while humble strength might not seem as significant as brute force, it builds a better foundation of loyalty and courage.
Gamache’s style of leadership is respectful, kind, and humble. The novel begins with Gamache’s frustration at his new agents who are intentionally incompetent, transferred in by Francoeur. When one agent admits to not interviewing a key witness, the others are eager for Gamache to discipline him harshly. Instead, Gamache speaks with him privately, asking about his prior work in the serious crimes division. Rather than chide the agent for his cynicism, Gamache says it would be “difficult not to grow cynical” in their line of work but explains how he has learned “how precious life is” (17), urging the agent to do better. When Lacoste wishes that the chief would be harsher because “The only thing a lion respects is a bigger lion” (93), Gamache says that the agents are toads, not lions: “There’s no need to step on them. You don’t make war on toads” (94). Gamache shows that true leadership builds others up rather than tearing them down to seem stronger.
Gamache’s leadership is humble. From the first book in the series, he teaches his agents that they should be familiar with four phrases: “I don't know. I need help. I'm sorry. I was wrong.” In How the Light Gets In, Gamache has to admit his lack of knowledge about computers and rely on Jérôme, and then Yvette Nichol. Because of the urgency of his work against Francoeur, Gamache is tempted to bulldoze over others, like the Brunels. Instead, he chooses to apologize when he goes against their wishes. On the night before the final showdown, Gamache wants them to work through the night, while Thérèse wants them to rest. Gamache ridicules Thérèse’s hesitancy and demands that they keep working. He changes his mind when he walks past the village church and sees a stained-glass memorial to soldiers from WWI. Gamache immediately comes back and apologizes, insisting that they wait until morning to complete their work. This shows that Gamache cares most about the people he leads, not his own ego.
By contrast, Francoeur is willing to bully and tear down others if it makes him stronger. He has no internal sense of right and wrong and is willing to destroy the individual for the whole. While Gamache carefully listens to his agents, Francoeur does not care about his agents’ work. When Tessier begins to explain the details of their raid, Francoeur stops him, not “because Francoeur was squeamish. It was that he just didn’t care. All he cared about was that it was done. The details he left to his subordinates” (187). Francoeur allows his agents to leak information about gangs to rivals, killing each other so that the police don’t need to bother. He directs his agents to spread lies about victims to make them sound complicit in the crimes. When a seven-year-old girl dies in the crossfire at one of his ordered raids, Francoeur has no remorse. While Gamache halts his work out of respect for the Brunels, Francoeur couldn’t care less about his agents’ safety: “He knew what he was capable of. He took pride in it even. Thought of himself as a wartime commander, not shrinking from difficult decisions” (257). Francoeur sees his work as “unpleasant but necessary” (257) to achieving political power over the region.
Penny not only contrasts the ethics of the two men’s leadership styles but shows how Gamache’s approach to leadership garners true loyalty. Francoeur mocks Gamache for broadcasting his resignation to the Sûreté, “as though we might care” (389), not realizing it was a signal for all of Gamache’s loyal agents to overtake Francoeur’s. Francoeur’s pride and lack of integrity causes him to assume that other agents operate in the same way. While Tessier and Francoeur’s agents follow his commands, they don’t go out of their way to help him. On the other hand, Lacoste, Nichol, and, in the end, Beauvoir, give everything they have, risking their lives for Gamache. Gamache was, as Thérèse Brunel noticed from the time she was a young agent, someone who leads “by example, not by force” (171). Gamache’s leadership wins out in the end because he is “someone you’d choose to follow” (171), even if his strength is humble.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Louise Penny
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Forgiveness
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Popular Study Guides
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection