57 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Holly, King examines how surface-level appearances influence peoples’ perceptions of one another, creating impressions that don’t always reflect reality. By making a seemingly sweet elderly couple into brutal murderers, King delivers a warning against judging solely on appearances.
On the outside, Emily and Rodney Harris are put-together, respectable, and intelligent people. They have long careers at Bell College under their belts, and though Rodney is known for his eccentric views on meat and Emily rubs several former colleagues the wrong way, the Harrises are generally considered upstanding citizens. Additionally, their status as elderly, well-off white couple means that people see them as safe by default. The couple plays on these assumptions, presenting themselves as well-meaning and helpless to lure in victims.
The same surface-level judgments that allow Emily and Rodney to hide in plain sight negatively impact Holly’s Black characters. The novel touches on the murder of Maleek Dutton, a Black man killed by a police officer during a traffic stop. Maleek was killed while reaching for his phone because the officer baselessly assumed he was reaching for a gun. The officer jumped to the conclusion that Maleek was dangerous due to his race, a feature of implicit bias. This incident reflects a spate of real-life incidences of police brutality in the US. According to a 2022 study by the Washington Post, systemic racism pervades police forces across the country: Black people accounted for 27% of people fatally shot by police in 2021, despite only making up 13% of the population.
King also explores the way racism becomes a justification for illegal actions. The racist Rodney believes that Maleek was killed for “resisting the police” (362). He is not making a conscious effort to change the narrative, but merely misremembering it in a way that fits into his worldview. Rodney assumes that someone who looks like Maleek must have done something to deserve his death, with the same subconscious casualty with which others assume he himself is harmless.
Emily harbors deeper and more insidious racist ideals. Upon seeing Barbara, Emily instantly makes negative assumptions about her character because she is Black and is surprised to learn that Barbara is talented. Emily’s underestimation of Barbara’s capabilities becomes part of her undoing: At the end of the novel, Barbara saves Holly and outs the Harrises posthumously as racist, murderous cannibals.
Emily and Rodney’s traditionally unthreatening appearance allows them to hide in plain sight for much of the novel, claiming five victims before being caught. Their names come up several times during Holly’s investigation, but she initially dismisses them from her suspect list because of their age and class. It is only once she sees past their appearances and focuses on their actions that she can identify them as the killers. King illustrates the effects of judging character based on appearances and encourages readers to interrogate their own perceptions rigorously.
The balance between evil and good is a recurring theme in King’s work. Life according to King is rarely fair or happy. His novels present loss, trauma, and the cruelty of other people as unavoidable parts of the human experience. These dark parts of life are matched only by the resilience and goodness of the human spirit. In Holly, King explores how people endure grief and trauma, suggesting that the best way forward is to acknowledge the painful reality of life while retaining hope and morality.
In her job as a private investigator, Holly comes face to face with the depths of human depravity several times. Before the events of Holly, she witnessed several murders and faced off against supernatural and human evils. In Holly, she confronts a more banal evil while she processes the recent loss of her mother and the lingering trauma of their toxic relationship.
Holly’s resilience is tested throughout the novel. At the start of the novel, she has lost her mother to COVID-19; she grapples with the mixture of emotions resulting from their fraught relationship. Shortly afterward, she learns that Charlotte had been deceiving her, hiding a fortune of six million dollars to make Holly give up on her budding career. This revelation shakes the bedrock of Holly’s life. She is deeply hurt at the knowledge that her mother wanted to undermine her aspirations and keep her emotionally stunted. After learning of Vera Steinman’s overdose, Holly outlines her philosophy on grief: either you cope, or you don’t. Holly chooses to cope, as do various other secondary characters.
Barbara Robinson is haunted by her brush with supernatural evil. Vera Steinman mourns the loss of her missing son Pete, and Penny Dahl struggles to maintain hope that her daughter will be found. Each character has their own coping strategy: Barbara expresses herself through poetry, Vera sobers up in honor of her late son, and Penny’s grief manifests as anger and desperation. When given the choice to “face or forget” their pain, each character chooses to “face [it], because there is no other choice” (146).
When things seem darkest for Holly, she draws on what King dubs “Holly hope,” her internal store of resilience and optimism. It is this inner well of hope that prevents her from giving up on the Bonnie Dahl case. Holly doggedly pursues every lead, even putting herself into harm’s way to learn the truth about the Deerfield Park disappearances. In killing the Harrises, Holly confronts and defeats pure human evil.
In Chapter 42, Holly laments, “there’s no end to evil” (442). The sum of all the evil acts she’s witnessed threatens to overwhelm her, and she contemplates quitting Finders Keepers for good. Given her large inheritance, she is faced with a final choice between surrendering to evil and rising above it. Working as a private investigator entails the continual choice to encounter evil, but gives Holly the means to help others and put goodness out into the world. Ultimately, Holly decides to remain in the business, cementing King’s thesis that the hardest parts of life can’t be ignored or outrun. The best that humans can do is keep pushing forward, finding moments of strength and joy amid the darkness.
Tensions between parents and children are a recurring motif in Holly. Through Holly’s relationship with her mother Charlotte, as well as several secondary mother-child pairs, King examines the complicated emotional legacy of mother-child relationships.
At the start of the novel, Holly’s mother Charlotte has recently died of COVID-19. Holly is unsure how to process the loss. She and Charlotte had a relationship fraught with anger and tension. Charlotte was a controlling mother who sought to limit Holly’s personal freedom due to her perception that her daughter was fragile and weak. The effects of Charlotte’s oppression, which Holly dubs “smother-love,” linger in the wake of her death—when doubting herself at key moments, Holly often hears her mother’s voice in her head.
Despite their contentious relationship, Holly grieves the loss of her mother. She describes the void left by her death and wonders “why does it hurt so much […] when she didn’t even like her mother and she’s so angry about the stupid way her mother died?” (66). The posthumous revelation that Charlotte was hiding her fortune further complicates their relationship, as does Holly’s visit to her childhood home, which brings back memories of Charlotte’s controlling parenting style. Holly oscillates between anger, guilt, and sadness. Her frequent recollections of Charlotte’s micro-managing advice contribute to the impression that her mother is still controlling aspects of her life, even after Charlotte’s death.
Several other mothers in Holly address the complicated nature of parenthood, though none are abusive like Charlotte. Vera Steinman’s alcohol dependency estranged her from her son Peter. Though the two repaired their relationship after she got sober, Vera says that they still fought. Indeed, disagreements between parents and children are commonplace; Penny and Bonnie Dahl loved one another but fought often and explosively about Bonnie’s future. Parents are fallible human beings who don’t always know what is best for their children, and familial love often goes hand-in-hand with resentment and anger.
At the end of the novel, Holly shakes off the last vestiges of Charlotte’s control. She no longer hears Charlotte’s voice in her head, and she is focused on her future—a future she chose independently and without manipulation. Vera commits to sobriety for the sake of Peter’s memory, while Penny mourns the loss of her daughter. Holly ultimately portrays parent-child relationships as complex, difficult, and durable ties whose legacies endure even after death.
Holly is an unusual mystery in that its murderous antagonists are an elderly couple. Throughout Emily and Rodney Harris, as well as several other elderly characters, King explores how humans cope with growing old. The narrative suggests that accepting aging and death as universal and inevitable parts of the human experience is a better approach than attempting to delay this inevitability.
King acknowledges that aging can be a terrifying and tragic process. As Olivia says in Chapter 26, “old age is a time of casting away, which is bad enough, but it is also a time of escalating indignities” (242). As people age, their bodies and minds decline in often painful ways, and the likelihood of loving loved ones increases. It’s natural that people fear aging, even though it is a biological inevitability for every human. In Chapter 28, Holly meets Hugh Clippard, a man in his 70s who works out fanatically and is in unusually good shape. As Hugh sadly catalogs friends who have died, Holly is put off by the fact that Hugh is an elderly man who cannot make peace with his old age. This is perhaps a harsh judgment from a character who cannot yet relate to the pain of aging, especially because she acknowledges that “time is the avenger” (270) which steals away beauty, health, and love.
Seventy-something Emily and 80-something Rodney suffer from the attendant problems of age: Emily has sciatica and Rodney displays ever-worsening symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. Their crimes are motivated by a wildly misguided pseudo-scientific conviction that they can reverse the effects of time on their bodies and minds by brutally murdering and cannibalizing younger people. Emily and Rodney believe that they deserve to be exempt from a natural part of the human experience. The fact that their chosen cure is so brutal is telling; their dogma, like their methodology, is literally counter to life.
Olivia Kingsbury is a foil to Emily and Rodney. Olivia is the oldest character in the novel and feels the physical and emotional effects of her 86 years. She is frail, largely confined to her home, and has rectal cancer. She has outlived her children and grandchildren and carries the grief of these losses. Yet Olivia doesn’t fight against the process of aging. Instead, she seeks joy in the parts of life which are still accessible to her, including her writing and her friendship with Barbara. When her cancer is found to have advanced, Olivia accepts her morality with grace. She dies smiling and holding the hands of two people who love her.
Emily and Rodney’s campaign to stop aging is futile. The placebo effects of their gruesome ritual lessen with each repetition. By the end of the novel, Rodney suffers from large memory lapses and Emily is in near-constant agony from her sciatica, leading her to wonder “if they’ve just been fooling themselves all along” (385). In Rodney’s final confrontation with Holly, he goes on a delusional rant about his health, claiming to that his skin is “smooth as [a] baby’s bottom” (393) while pointing to his “hollow wrinkled cheek” (393). This clear contradiction between Rodney’s perception of himself and reality suggests that all the benefits the Harrises claim to enjoy are illusory.
The premature deaths of the Harrises’ victims highlight the fact that aging can be seen as a gift. The victims would likely have given anything for the chance to continue living and grow old. Through the arcs of the Harrises and their victims, King drives home the point that aging is not something to be fought. Rather, it should be accepted with grace as a privilege that not everyone gets to experience.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Stephen King
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Disability
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Health & Medicine
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Mothers
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
Psychological Fiction
View Collection
Safety & Danger
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection