Holly

King’s novels often contrast the human capacity for evil with acts of kindness, bravery, and selflessness. How does this contrast play out in Holly? What does the novel imply about human nature?

Much of Holly Gibney’s character growth takes place in King’s earlier canon. What impact is achieved by the novel starting with an almost-fully realized Holly? Is it harder to engage with a character whose primary development has happened “off-screen”?

Consider the novel’s mentor figures, such as Olivia and Bill. How do their relationships with the younger people in their lives compare to the novel’s parent-child relationships? What similarities and differences do they feature and why?

Many of King’s novels incorporate supernatural elements. These are notably absent in Holly. Why might King have chosen to explore a more realistic, human evil? Is Holly as compelling as King’s other works?

What effect is achieved by the inclusion of timely sociopolitical themes such as police brutality, Donald Trump’s presidency, and COVID-19? Do you find King’s portrayal of these large-scale issues realistic and effective?

How does Holly Gibney compare to the archetype of a private investigator? Which conventions of the detective thriller does Holly observe, and which does the novel break? Why?

How does the novel portray neurodivergence, mental health, and substance use disorder?

Is Holly’s take on trauma and healing complete and fair? If not, what elements are missing?