51 pages 1 hour read

Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 4-6Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “The Biggest Thing We Make”

Chapter 4 Summary: “The Last and Future Kingdom”

Waste Management is the largest waste disposal company in the world, but its real business is in real estate investment in landfills. David Steiner, the CEO of Waste Management, believes landfills are a solution, not a problem. He says, “There will always be waste […] And we’ll always need landfills” (84). He does concede, though, that more of his business is becoming devoted to “zero waste” technologies that enable recapturing the value of waste. Steiner even posits that in the future, Waste Management will pay for trash to convert into valuable materials.

In the 1980s, Waste Management led an effort to privatize the waste disposal industry that diffused sustainability efforts. In the 1970s, the EPA recommended extracting value from waste prior to landfilling, but action never materialized because of the expense and risk of such processes and the availability of cheap landfill space. After decades of rapid expansion in the landfill business and a near collapse after its illegal toxic dumping was discovered, Waste Management went green. As of 2013, the company had over 100 waste-to-energy power plants that powered over one million homes and 1,000 garbage trucks. Humes notes that Waste Management’s green initiatives rely on landfills. It is hedging its bets and acting more responsibly within the confines of its core business model. Real progress demands successful companies like Waste Management act against their interests—something unlikely to happen. Waste Management’s eco-endeavors involve recycling waste or turning it into energy initiatives that require the continued production of waste.

In 1983, Los Angeles Sanitation Districts attempted to convert Puente Hills into a large waste-to-energy plant. Humes explains:

It was envisioned as a new type of garbage solution that would combine a network of high-tech power plants to convert the daily flow of garbage into electricity with a sorting and recycling center and a landfill to contain what was left over once the reclamation and generation was done (91).

The organization received a 10-year permit to construct the facility, but before it could break ground, public opposition derailed the endeavor. The city of Los Angeles simultaneously proposed three other large waste-to-energy plants, all of which were also derailed. NIMBYism (the “Not In My Backyard” philosophy), environmental concerns, and confusion regarding the projects’ details spearheaded opposition. Puente Hills and almost every other landfill in the country remained solely landfills and even expanded their landfill operations to accommodate more trash.

The Puente Hills Landfill is now closed, and Angelinos pay more than quadruple what they were to send their waste to the desert via rail. Puente Hills is now in its “terminal Phase.” After closing a landfill, operators spend years permanently sealing it with a thick cap, then transforming it into a park by landscaping it and building roads. Subsequently, engineers will spend years maintaining, monitoring, repairing, retrenching, and reinstalling gas lines in the area. Puente Hills may become a park, a mall, a stadium complex, or a theme park someday, but underneath it will always be a landfill—an archaeologist’s dream record of our civilization.

Chapter 5 Summary: “Down to the Sea in Chips”

Mary Crowley is a former teacher who captains the Kaisei for her nonprofit Project Kaisei. Crowley’s goal is to find a way to remove the garbage comprising the Great Pacific Garbage Patch from the ocean. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is a near-million-square-mile soup of trash trapped in a gyre in the Pacific Ocean. What alarms Crowley about the garbage patch are microplastics: “Tiny pieces of plastic, a trashy confetti too small to see from the ship deck” (109). Lantern fish confuse microplastics for food and consume them. Larger fish eat lantern fish, filling their bodies with the microplastics the lantern fish consumed. Even larger fish eat the fish that ate the lantern fish, filling their bodies with the microplastics in turn, so on and so on up the food chain, until a human consumes all those microplastics, which never leave our bodies. Nearly one in ten lantern fish Crowley studies has microplastics in its system.

Some say extracting trash from the Garbage Patch is impossible, and that all we can do is commit to adding less. The technology doesn’t exist to remove that much plastic from the ocean, and even if it did, the cost, logistics, and environmental harm of the process would outweigh any potential benefit. Crowley disagrees and asserts that cleaning the Garbage Patch must be an element of any solution.

Nurdles are tiny plastic pellets that are melted and shaped into plastic products. This is how all plastic products are made. Plastic manufacturers ship billions of nurdles per year around the world, and many fall loose during transportation. Nurdles comprise 10% of plastic found on beaches. The final resting place for both nurdles and manufactured plastic products is either a landfill or the ocean. Heavy plastics sink quickly, but light plastics like nurdles, plastic bags, milk jugs, and bottle caps float. Currents carry this plastic until the Coriolis effect traps it in the spiraling currents of one of Earth’s five ocean gyres. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch spans two gyres—the South Pacific and the North Pacific. At 20 million square miles, the North Pacific Gyre is the largest ecosystem on Earth.

While sailing across the Gyre from Hawaii to California in 1997, Charles Moore found himself in an endless soup of trash. He says, “It seemed unbelievable, but I never found a clear spot. […] no matter what time of day I looked, plastic debris was floating everywhere: bottles, bottle caps, wrappers, fragments” (117). After that experience, Moore devoted his life and inherited family oil fortune to ending plastic ocean pollution. He financed research that found the Pacific Gyre had six times as much plastic as it did zooplankton, and in California’s coastal waters, the quantity of plastic was more than double the amount of plankton. Moore’s efforts are limited to stopping the flow of plastic to the ocean. He believes removing the plastic already in the water is impossible.

To Crowley, the issue isn’t a question of possible or impossible. Human health is tied to the ocean’s health. Crowley believes that if we don’t clean the ocean, humans won’t survive, so we must find a way to do so. Crowley brought inventor Norton Smith on a Kaisei expedition. Smith had developed four prototypes of devices to remove trash from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch: the Lagoon, the Sweep, the Pyramid, and the Beach. Each is inexpensive to make and passively floats in the water while removing trash debris. The most successful device was the Beach, which resembles an inclined beach. Plastic floats up the ramp and into a capture net, but sea creatures do not. Still, Humes estimates that it would take 16 years and an investment of $500 million to remove the garbage with the Beach. This extensive and costly effort would be trivial if not combined with a global reduction in waste entering the ocean. 

Chapter 6 Summary: “Nerds vs. Nurdles”

Miriam Goldstein was a doctoral student at the Scripps Institution at the University of California, San Diego when she led a research team to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch for three weeks of sampling, preserving, experimenting, and observing. Humes explains, “Goldstein’s primary interest is how the unusual critters that live in the gyre, most of them small and many of them microscopic, interact with the debris and plastic in their midst” (131). She found that small ocean life is attaching to pieces of plastic and being transported to other ocean ecosystems, upsetting the balance of nature. Goldstein believes this is a vital issue because these microscopic organisms create half the oxygen humans breathe. Goldstein also found that plastic particles collect toxic chemicals and concentrate persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The Garbage Patch transports these POPs across the ocean, where they harm marine ecosystems and endanger the safety of our food. Humes explains:

Let’s say a little fish eats ten tiny pieces of POPs […] then a bigger fish comes along and eats ten of those tiny fish. Now we have a fish that has imbibed the equivalent of one hundred contaminated pieces of plastic. Then a bigger fish eats a bunch of those, and so on up the food chain […] At some point, some of those larger creatures end up in the seafood case or the canned goods aisle at your local supermarket. (132-33)

Through biomagnification the chemicals become more concentrated at each step of the food chain.

United Nations (UN) figures estimate 7 million tons of trash enter Earth’s oceans yearly. Plastic comprises 80% of our yearly ocean trash dump. The 5 Gyres research group estimates the Earth’s five gyres contain over 157 million tons of plastic. Ocean trash is just one man-made stress on marine ecosystems. Together with overfishing, climate change, and acidification, it is destroying ocean habitats.

Part 1, Chapters 4-6 Analysis

Waste Management’s five major sustainability initiatives are: waste-to-energy, modernizing landfills, recycling, eco-friendly garbage trucks, and recycling organics. All depend on landfills, on the disposable economy, and on Americans generating increasingly more waste. With substantial investments in landfills and waste collection vehicles, it would be against the company’s interests to propose any solutions that don’t involve waste and landfills. Consequently, their green initiatives will only produce marginal environmental benefits and zero waste-reduction benefits. They don’t address the environmental issues involved in creating, distributing, and collecting the items that comprise our disposable economy, so they cannot shepherd us away from our disposable economy or be a solution to its ills.

Waste Management’s efforts, and the efforts of similar companies, offer mitigation at best and an excuse for complacence at worst. As Humes explains, ineffectual “green” campaigns can be damaging because they inspire complacence and increased consumption. When Waste Management tells us it is disposing of our waste in a sustainable way, it is granting us informal permission to waste more. Given that the primary waste issue in the United States is preventing it from reaching our forests and waterways, Waste Management’s chief sustainability effort should arguably be ensuring as much waste as possible reaches its landfills and recycling facilities and is prevented from migrating to the ocean. Further, the company should dedicate some of its near $15 billion in yearly revenue to removing trash from the Earth’s five gyres—an endeavor Humes writes would cost $500 million over 16 years for the largest gyre. Removing all trash from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch with Smith’s “Beach” device would require just 0.2% of Waste Management’s yearly revenue for 16 years.

Waste-to-energy technology was developed in the United Kingdom in the late 1800s. The primary method of generating energy from waste has been, and still is, incineration—burning trash. Other waste-to-energy methods include gasification to produce synthetic fuels, thermal depolymerization to produce synthetic crude oil, pyrolysis to produce combustible tar, plasma arc gasification to produce gasses for fuel cells, anaerobic digestion to produce biogas, fermentation to produce ethanol, and mechanical biological treatment. Modern incineration plants do not produce harmful emissions, but historically the practice has been harmful to the environment and public health. In the early 20th century, many state and local governments encouraged backyard incineration, and many Americans continue to burn trash to avoid the hassle and cost of proper disposal. Burning certain materials produces dioxins that don’t otherwise exist in those items. Backyard trash burning causes heart disease, respiratory ailments, rashes, nausea, and headaches. The practice also generates toxic chemicals that contaminate crops and waterways and are eventually consumed by humans.

Outdated commercial incinerators pose similar threats and are prohibited from operating in the United States, but modern waste incinerators are required by the EPA and state environmental protection agencies to technologically reduce dioxin emissions and control pollution. Cogeneration facilities recapture these gasses and use them to create another form of energy, so they are not released into the atmosphere. Still, waste-to-energy is prohibitively expensive—50% more than landfilling and even more costly than recycling. Given our glut of landfill space, many in both the waste and energy industries question the practice’s advisability. Even staunch sustainability advocates advise incinerating only what can’t be recycled or composted.

Ridding the ocean of garbage is the top priority of many waste activists (it is likely the second priority of all environmental activists, behind addressing climate change). Like trash in landfills, ocean trash is hidden. Most of us don’t spend our days sailing through the ocean’s gyres, so we are ignorant to the proliferation of garbage there, but the effect ocean trash has on our health and the global ecosystem is not hidden—it is in the food we eat, the water we drink, and the air we breathe. The six primary drivers of ocean pollution are plastics, marine debris, climate change, coastal development, acidification (caused by pollution and climate change), and overfishing. Ocean pollution is a preventable issue and a solvable problem. Eliminating ocean pollution is compatible with a disposable economy, industry interests, and even landfills. Preventing ocean pollution does not require changes in the way we manufacture or consume but only strict controls in the waste disposal stream. If we ensure our plastic and other waste finds its way to landfills and recycling facilities instead of waterways, we will increase our own public health while making the shareholders of Waste Management happy.

Humes and some he interviews assert the expense of removing the ocean’s trash and time the effort would take are too great. However, multiple organizations are now using sustainable devices to rid the ocean of its garbage, and stubborn activists across the globe are dismissing naysayers and moving forward removing ocean trash. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 51 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools