38 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In America, the 1970s began with the Kent State massacre perpetrated by the National Guard and the Watergate scandal. It concluded with revelations about the CIA’s MK-Ultra programs, undermining American confidence in the government and stoking fears about secretive and harmful overreach. Firestarter reflects the mistrust of the government that was pervasive at the time, heightened by the nuclear threats of the Cold War.
In Firestarter, King implies that the MK-Ultra project was well known throughout America. For example, Irv Manders, a farmer in rural New York, tells Andy that he believes his wild tale of secret government agencies and shadowy scientific testing; he has heard of “CIA guys giving people drinks spiked with LSD” (110). This speaks to how broadly suspicions of the government had spread.
King portrays authoritarian forces as antagonistic, with Firestarter being his most direct critique of the American government. As King writes in the Afterward, it is an “undeniable fact that the U.S. government, or agencies thereof, has indeed administered potentially dangerous drugs to unwitting persons” (402). His epigraph is the opening line of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 (1953), a novel about a dystopian government’s overreach. This frames Firestarter as a critique of governmental authority. King also critiques authority through Cap, who cannot deny the “insidious sort of cancer” that is always detectable in the “upper echelons” (186).
King creates a damning portrait of governmental authority. Throughout the novel, King mentions examples of government overreach and federal failures. He acknowledges suspicions, using them to perpetuate his characterization of the malicious Shop and its agents’ interests. He also dedicates entire chapters to detailing how government agents are making plans to suppress and trample the freedoms of American citizens. He evokes institutional failures, such as the “thalidomide babies,” who were born with birth defects after their mothers had taken thalidomide. His discussions of the KGB and George Orwell’s novel 1984 (1949) evoke governments that have turned against their populaces.
King reinforces the toxic nature of governmental authority through his depiction of the Shop and its practices. The Shop’s facility is underground, suggesting that its activities need to be hidden. Its strict hierarchy, detailed through Rainbird’s active “demotion” to custodian, evokes a regimented and inflexible inner society. In much the same way, the Shop’s methods are oppressive and confining. The Lot Six trials, their subsequent cover-up, and the horror of Andy’s detention speak to an authority that cares little for the rights of those it governs. Andy is kept perpetually drugged, recalling the MK-Ultra trials, some which lasted 77 consecutive days, and underscoring how the government has unethically used civilians as test subjects. When the Lot Six trials are canceled, it is not because of moral implications or individual harm. Rather, the program is scrapped because it does not afford the primary thing the authorities are after—"control.”
The novel’s ending, in which Charlie reveals the truth about the Shop, echoes the Watergate scenario. With Watergate, the public found out about President Nixon and the government’s corruption, leading to change. In the case of Firestarter, King leaves the ending more ambiguous; it is still possible that the government will suppress her story. Tarkington’s appearance at the novel’s end is a reminder of the government’s reach and their cruel indifference and terror tactics.
King’s portrait is a critique of the wholesale failure of authority. Even Andy, who has the best intentions, continually fails Charlie. Charlie must free herself from authority in order to live an independent life. King implies that authority is not the answer, and that authority figures have little to no incentive to protect their charges beyond the utility offered by people underneath authority figures.
Much of Firestarter is about gaining a meaningful sense of control. The Shop’s attempts to possess Charlie speak to its desire to manipulate its creation. Both Andy and Rainbird try to control Charlie, while Charlie fights to control her power and her own feelings of guilt and despair.
The dystopian aspects of the novel work alongside a coming-of-age story, where Charlie grows into maturity and leaves childhood behind. Her struggle to gain control of her ability is literal, but it is also a metaphor for growing into oneself. Charlie’s last act in the novel, her decision to march to New York to tell her story, reflects how she is taking control and becoming self-actualized.
Through the government, King portrays the toxic side of control. The Shop attempts to create a human weapon that they can manipulate. They use both physical violence and psychological manipulation. King considers this element vital, and to this end, uses his novel to explore the seeming amorality of the process by illustrating not only the government making malicious use of it, but also its apparently benevolent use by Charlie’s parents.
King concretizes the multifaceted nature of manipulation though Dr. Wanless’s conversation with Cap (76-79). Wanless illustrates the benign method of psychological manipulation practiced by mindful parents, whose use of the procedure seems to ameliorate its actual purpose of psychological control. Through the building of the “complex” (76), parents are able to effect behaviors, even before they can rationally explain the need for such behaviors, seen most readily in toilet training. This process, of building programs of control, also gains a tight focus in the work. Entire chapters discuss the best methods of psychological control undertaken by government agents. King focuses on the play-by-play minutiae of experimentation. There are no accidents under government supervision; the purpose is pre-rational control; the anecdote about toilet training serves as a guiding paradigm for the methods of manipulation on display within the novel.
The evil nature of psychological manipulation is most visible in John Rainbird’s grooming of Charlie. King invests Rainbird with a possible sexual motive, heightening the stakes and horror. Rainbird grooms Charlie to act as his partner. He cultivates her trust through gaslighting and false empathy, a mimicry of the way parents act to retain control over their child. Trust and love, in this sense, simply become tools for control. Rainbird ultimately manipulates himself as well; he convinces himself that though he has placed Charlie in a dangerous situation, he is serving her best interests.
Even a good character like Andy uses control in a negative way. His primary psychic ability, his “push,” seems to remove the necessity for elaborate psychological manipulation. However, like the government, he is using control to serve his own interests. In his sideline business, for instance, he uses his ability to boost self-confidence and effect weight loss. Additionally, Andy manipulates Charlie’s powers to his own ends—he instills great shame in her over her abilities but allows her to use them when he deems it necessary.
King shows that the most effective method of psychological manipulation is the propagation of fear. Charlie’s fear—of herself, of her ability—is carefully cultivated. Charlie is constantly being presented with hypotheticals, first by her father and mother, and then by Rainbird, of what might happen if she were to lose control of her ability. Fear haunts Charlie, and presents a considerable burden on her psyche. Andy and Vicky perpetuate Charlie’s fear so that she will suppress her power, while Rainbird uses fear to encourage her to develop it. All three depict the treacherous nature of psychological manipulation, even when well-intended. This psychological manipulation is an extension of the failures of authority; psychological manipulation is portrayed as authority’s primary tool. In order to come of age, Charlie must overcome this manipulation.
Firestarter centers upon the cascading consequences of the Lot Six experiment. The effects of the experiment resonate throughout the novel. The narration never directly comments on the ethical implications of scientifically experimenting on living subjects. However, King creates a critique in his presentation of events and through his negative portrayal of the scientific team behind the experiments.
King frames his critique by mentioning “thalidomide babies” and mothers who took DES, a hormone. These are both real-world examples of how human test subjects suffered. They speak to how institutions responsible for health and well-being failed, and suggest a faulty system.
King focuses on the Lot Six test. Though there was only one test, it has wide-ranging consequences, such as the death of test subjects and their persecution by the government. Through this fictional experiment, King suggests that real experiments—such as MK-Ultra—are inhumane. In his Afterword, King acknowledges how MK-Ultra influenced the book.
To portray the horror of the Lot Six experiment, King dwells on how it harmed Andy, and on the planning and subsequent testing of Charlie. He makes it clear that the Shop is planning these actions deliberately, and how they are sanctioned by the people in authority. This is a case not of ignorance or accident but of overwhelming control. The Shop, King emphasizes, is wholly aware of the harm it causes. The people in charge—Cap, Dr. Wanless, and Dr. Hockstetter—are all portrayed as villains.
The government dehumanizes Charlie. They turn her into an anomaly that must be controlled. This allows them to conduct their experiments with moralistic impunity. Charlie is frequently compared to an atomic bomb; the experimentation on her recalls the Manhattan project during World War II, where nuclear weapons were developed, and the lingering fears of nuclear war during the Cold War. Charlie is treated like a test animal, without agency. This expands the novel’s ethical inquisition into animal testing and the treatment of animals in general. The horses in the Shop stable represent Charlie’s innocence, but also her well of power. The killing of the horses illustrates the lack of care for vulnerable life by governmental bodies.
King does not wholly condemn testing on living subjects. Through testing, Charlie gains power and confidence, leading to her destruction of the Shop. However, even when Charlie regains control over her power, she is still unable to live a normal life. Overall, King portrays testing as having a disregard for the agency and liberty of test subjects, whether animal or human. Testing severely reduces the quality of life of test subjects, who are unable to fit into society during or after the experiments.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Stephen King