62 pages 2 hours read

Enough

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

President Trump’s Weak Leadership

Throughout her work, Hutchinson portrays President Trump as lacking in important leadership qualities. Through her anecdotes, she claims that Trump’s leadership was weakened by his vanity, hostility towards critics and opponents, difficulty with empathy, explosive temper, and obsession with appearing strong and in control. For example, she reveals that Trump did not reject a COVID mask due to an ideological stance about how to behave during the pandemic but rather because he did not like that his makeup was visible on the mask’s white straps. Although Hutchinson agreed with his decision at the time, she considers how this may have set a poor example: “The press would criticize him for not wearing a mask, not knowing that the depth of his vanity had caused him to reject masks— and then millions of his fans followed suit” (106). To reinforce her claim that Trump was obsessed with his image, Hutchinson describes how Trump would require his valet to carry a mirror so he could look at himself before events. Trump also commented on Hutchinson’s appearance, telling her to make her hair blonder and complimenting her when she obliged and did so.

Hutchinson claims that one of Trump’s major weaknesses was his difficulty with empathy and personal connections. The author argues that during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans were distressed and needed reassurance, and Trump was unable to act appropriately in the situation because he “lacked empathy” (72). Hutchinson was frustrated that even when he became sick himself, Trump did not try to relate to the experiences that Americans were going through. She writes, “His strength would make a better impression if he had expressed empathy for his fellow COVID sufferers…” (145). Trump’s team tried to help him navigate this weakness; for instance, they informed him that it would appear callous to vacation at Mar-a-Lago “while so many Americans were dying in a pandemic” (96). This self-centered nature culminated in Trump refusing to accept the 2020 election results; rather than prioritize the country and a peaceful transition of power, he put his ego above all else, resulting in the Capitol attack on January 6.

Hutchinson also accuses Trump of having a volatile temper and shares many anecdotes about avoiding him when he was in a bad mood. For instance, at a poorly attended rally, Hutchinson knew that Trump would be upset at the low attendance and recalls, “I didn’t want to be anywhere near the president when he saw all the empty seats” (118). Hutchinson reports that the president’s meltdowns included throwing food in the White House and screaming at staff or his own lawyers. According to Hutchinson, Trump’s greatest weakness, ironically, was his desire to always appear strong and in control. She calls this impulse his “greatest kryptonite,” which the staff sometimes used to manipulate him into following their advice (181). She felt that Trump’s urge to always project strength made him out of touch and motivated his hostility, including his inability to publicly admit that he lost the 2020 election. In contrast to his behavior, Hutchinson provides examples of even-tempered people who put the country above their egos, like Liz Cheney and her Uncle Joe. She also ends the book with a warning to Republicans about the dangers of believing in conspiracy theories and putting their faith in Trump, as he is not a leader with their best interests in mind.

Loyalty, Power, and Corruption

In Enough, Hutchinson explores the concept of loyalty and how it can easily become misplaced and foster corruption. Her memoir spans the entirety of her time working in the White House, and she demonstrates how building close personal relationships with those in power while also being increasingly empowered herself caused her to lose sight of her ideals and form intense loyalties to individuals rather than offices.

Hutchinson explains that when she was hired by Mark Meadows, she wanted to serve the chief of staff’s office, not Meadows as an individual. However, over time, Hutchinson admits that in her effort to be a “loyal foot soldier” (64), she became more devoted to the individuals she worked for than the country she served. She suggests that Meadows encouraged her to develop an intense personal loyalty to him to make her more useful to him. He likened her job as his aide to being his “eyes and ears,” his “person,” and his “shadow,” and that she would “speak and act for me” (82). The language attributed to him here emphasizes the depersonalization that can come with this type of loyalty, using metaphor and synecdoche to depict Hutchinson as part of Meadows rather than an individual. Hutchinson explains that while she had not intended to become Meadows’ “henchman,” she knew she had a “growing dedication” to him and Trump (127). When Meadows told her that he would do “anything” for Trump to secure a second term in office, Hutchinson felt further pressure to develop an extreme loyalty to the president. She began using power in a similar way, lashing out at staffers who expressed the same doubts she held privately. This shows the cyclical nature of power and corruption as those on the receiving end also exert power on others.

Hutchinson connects her intense loyalty to Meadows and Trump with her initial inability to challenge their behavior and condemn their actions on January 6, claiming that the Trump administration’s strict code of “loyalty” was used to pressure her into withholding information from the January 6 Committee. She recalls how her Trump-funded lawyer brought up her past work relationships to encourage her to stay quiet: “Stefan had planted the seeds of old allegiances with his reference to my loyalty: We know you’re loyal. We know you’re on Team Trump” (276). By this time, Hutchinson felt that Trump’s circle was using the concept of loyalty to manipulate her and keep her in their “grip.” This tactic was so effective that the author felt “as if Donald Trump was looking over my shoulder” (276). By sharing these experiences, Hutchinson accuses Trump and Meadows of explicitly encouraging an unhealthy individual loyalty that corrupted her sense of morals and obligation. 

Patriotism and Service

In Hutchinson’s memoir, she explains how she wrestled with her dilemma of whether to be honest with the January 6 Committee—and herself—about everything she had seen and done in the Trump administration. As Hutchinson became increasingly disillusioned by Trump, his inner circle, and his supporters, she felt she needed a new role model to follow who exemplified real patriotism and service. Hutchinson felt inspired after she discovered Alex Butterfield’s role in the Nixon administration and was amazed by the many parallels between their lives. Reading The Last of the President’s Men, Hutchinson learned how Butterfield prioritized being truthful to investigators over his personal and political allegiance to President Nixon. She writes, “[H]is fidelity was to the Constitution, to the country he swore an oath to protect, and to the public who demanded his trust. He felt he owed it to the country and the investigators to reveal the truth or else imperil our democracy” (285). In Butterfield, Hutchinson saw reflections of her Uncle Joe, a soldier whose patriotism and service to his country initially inspired her to enter politics.

As such, this brand of patriotism inspired her and helped give her the clarity she needed to make the same moral choice: to tell the truth. She admits, “I had rediscovered my moral compass” (286), reiterating that while she had worked for the Trump administration, she had not always been acting on her principles. Reflecting on her role in the Trump government and its aftermath, she confesses that her actions were based on “misplaced loyalties” rather than the oath she took when she became a government employee. Hutchinson admits that she twisted her notion of patriotism to avoid the discomfort of confronting the administration over January 6, writing “I was complicit, and called it my patriotic duty” (241). This affirms that ideals like patriotism can be contorted by bad actors who conflate figureheads with the nation as a whole.

With Butterfield as her example, Hutchinson came to view her honest testimony as a form of active service to the country and, therefore, an act of patriotism. Hutchinson contrasts her new approach with that of a passive “bystander,” writing, “I did not find the path to my newfound freedom—I bushwhacked my way, and was now free to empower my patriotism again and, as Alex Butterfield had, to reveal the truth rather than be a bystander” (302). Hutchinson demonstrates that by embracing a new mindset that placed the country and Constitution over personal commitments and loyalties, she felt motivated to testify for the Committee and become a patriot like Alex Butterfield. In her Epilogue, she encourages others to do the same and work toward the betterment of the United States as a whole.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 62 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools