63 pages 2-hour read

Endgame: Inside the Royal Family and the Monarchy's Fight for Survival

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 11-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 11 Summary: “Ghost at the Feast: Princess Diana and Revisionist History”

Despite Princess Diana’s death in a car crash in 1997, she continues to be a huge part of the monarchy’s story and persists in the public’s memory. For Harry, especially, her presence is a large part of his life; he has felt her guiding him through difficult moments and decisions, including leaving the monarchy. Part of the latter was even motivated by Harry’s determination that Diana’s story does not repeat with his own wife.


For the monarchy, Diana’s story is one they wish to partly escape. Her life was of the Palace’s making: They rejected Camilla and picked out Diana as a more suitable consort for Charles because she was “slim, virginal, and aristocratic” (245). However, Diana proved to be far more difficult to tame than the Palace thought. She was modern, strong-minded, and immensely popular, and she was dubbed the “people’s princess.” This, in combination with Charles’s affair and Diana’s depression, led to their already unhappy marriage imploding. The last straw was the 1995 BBC Panorama interview with Martin Bashir where Diana openly spoke about her mental health struggles, and both hers and Charles’s infidelity. She wrested control of her story during a time when the royal family was still holding fast to the adage of “never complain, never explain” (248). The Queen had had enough: A month later, she ordered Charles and Diana to divorce.


Just a year later, however, Diana passed away, and ever since then, her story has completely slipped away from her. The media and the Firm have carefully chosen parts of her legacy to portray singular dimensions and aspects of her life to suit their respective agendas. Diana has alternatively been portrayed as a saint or adulteress, with much of her suffering erased altogether. The Palace even staged photo opportunities or selected outfits for both Kate and Meghan at different times that call back to moments from Diana’s life, resulting in profit from a paid exhibition of Diana’s clothes, jewelry, and photographs, titled “Diana: Her Fashion Story.”


The two moments in history when the royal family lost control of the narrative with Diana were Bashir’s interview and the publication of Andrew Morton’s biography, Diana: Her True Story. After Diana’s death, Morton updated it with an epilogue acknowledging that Diana herself had contributed to the book’s making. There was nothing the Firm could do about the book, but in 2022, the BBC took the Panorama interview off the air for good. This followed a BBC-led investigation, supported by the royal family, which discovered that Bashir had used unethical means to win Diana’s cooperation for the interview: He had convinced her that the royal family was spying on her in order to get to tell her side of the story.


Harry and William’s statements about the interview following the investigation were vastly different. Both decried the deceitful means by which the interview was gathered, but while Harry reminded his audience of Diana’s strengths and how she stood for honesty and candor, William presented the idea that Bashir and his tactics had fed into Diana’s “paranoia.” He suggested that his mother was manipulated into presenting a false narrative. The Firm used William, Diana’s older son, to rewrite the narrative about Diana’s interview and undermine the veracity of her claims in it.


The investigation and William’s statement come at an opportune time, with Charles and Camilla taking the reins shortly after, and Harry and Meghan’s saga dredging up similar issues. It became imperative for the Firm to erase and rewrite the uncomfortable parts of Diana’s chapter, keeping only those that benefitted them. The Firm also learned its lessons from Diana’s interview. Shortly before Harry and Meghan’s Oprah Winfrey interview was to air, a smear campaign against the Sussexes was launched in the British media. It included stories of Meghan bullying palace staff, and it not only tanked the Sussexes’ popularity but painted Meghan as an aggressor. Thus, when her own claims came out in the interview, she appeared far less believable and garnered little sympathy.


The royal family has a history of treating the women who marry into the family poorly, from Diana and Meghan to Sarah, Duchess of York, who was also shunned for years for speaking about her separation from Prince Andrew. Kate has been the exception because she has never opposed the Firm. Being the wife to and mother of the next two heirs to the throne, Kate is afforded a level of protection that escaped the others, including the vocal and mercurial Diana.

Chapter 12 Summary: “Skilled Survivors: Camilla and Kate, Windsor Women”

Part I: Camilla—The Transformation of a Mistress


Born into an aristocratic family with a penchant for socializing and the fine life, Camilla Shand’s upbringing thoroughly prepared her for the royal life. She attended the Queen’s Gate school as a young girl, an institution focused on preparing upper-class girls for socializing and running a big house. Instead of obtaining a higher education, she attended a Swiss finishing school. Camilla is proud of her education, a concerning thing to Scobie in an era where the classist and sexist ideas underlining the kind of schooling Camilla has had are thoroughly outdated.


Camilla grew up with not just the skills to socialize, but the sensibilities to withstand any circumstance without crumbling. She grew up in the 1960s, and though she was not among those women advocating for equality and feminism, she nevertheless reaped the benefits of the time, especially the “sexual freedoms” women enjoyed. This is partially why the Palace rejected Camilla as a suitable partner for Charles. However, Camilla didn’t let this stand in the way of her relationship with Charles or the rest of her life. As Charles and Diana wedded, Camilla herself married Andrew Parker Bowles, and she continued to be there for Charles all the same. Despite both of them having married, Camilla welcomed Charles into her home and life whenever he needed her; over the years, she became an essential part of his life as a firm supporter and confidante.


Charles and Camilla’s affair proceeded quietly until things blew up in the ‘90s, with Diana publicly airing her marital grievances. The Queen ordered Charles and Diana’s divorce; Camilla’s husband sought to marry one of his lovers; and Camilla ended up the most hated woman in the nation. Because of her “stiff upper lip” upbringing, however, she stayed quiet and resilient. She maintained her silence publicly and continued to prioritize her relationship with Charles.


The Palace eventually came to recognize and appreciate this composure, and once it became clear that Camilla was a non-negotiable part of Charles’s life, set out on a mission to rehabilitate her image. Over the years, the Palace transformed her perception from “the other woman” to “the woman who waited,” through PR appearances and events. Acceptance of Camilla became official in 2005, when Charles and Camilla finally wed.


There was still work to be done, and Camilla’s friendships with important people and celebrities would soon become invaluable. Her close friend, the former morning show TV host Piers Morgan, was the editor-in-chief at the Daily Mirror; he carried out some of the most aggressive reporting about Diana during her lifetime and has also been generally negative in his reporting about Meghan. Camilla is also friends with actress Dame Judi Dench, who uncharacteristically spoke up and criticized the Netflix series The Crown for its fictionalization and sensationalization of certain events surrounding the royal family. This came at a time when the fifth season of the show, focused on Charles and Diana’s marital troubles, threatened to knock down Camilla’s popularity. Despite this, Camilla is adept at forming independent relationships with the media and tabloids through her natural charm and good humor; she is generally well-liked by the tabloid journalists for her willingness to engage in a way the other royals aren’t.


The same cannot be said for the entire royal family. Camilla’s relationship with William and Harry is complicated, and it took them a while to accept Charles marrying her. William and Kate have enjoyed a closer relationship with Charles and Camilla after Harry and Meghan’s departure, while the latter has no relationship at all with her anymore. Camilla’s relationship with her own two children is extremely strong.


As a working royal, Camilla has put in the work to earn the Palace’s appreciation. She is involved in numerous charities, including those for important or less glamorous causes, from domestic abuse to osteoporosis (her mother died after suffering from the latter). Following Charles’s ascension to the throne, Camilla took on the title of Queen, despite initial claims that she would only be “Queen Consort.” However, Camilla is not particularly desirous of the throne, as some believe. She simply sees it as an unavoidable part of life with the man she loves, and she remains as committed to Charles as she was from the beginning. Now, as Queen Camilla, her rehabilitation appears complete. While the Palace machinery was responsible for a lot of it, one cannot discredit her efforts.


Part II: Kate—Suddenly Front and Center


Kate—or Catherine, Princess of Wales—has always maintained a smaller work schedule than the other working royals. This partly comes from her shy and introverted personality. She prefers to do engagements and outings that involve children or sports, where the focus is on her actions and not on her words. Kate also had an easier time staying away from public events, especially initially, as the focus was on her role and duty to produce an heir and spares. Because of this, both the Palace and the media have been far easier on her than on others in the family.


A large focus of Kate’s work has been the cause of early childhood development: She established the Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood. However, because her royal role requires her to stay away from politics, Kate has only been able to amplify findings rather than push for actual solutions. Despite this and the far fewer number of engagements Kate does, the media reportage surrounding Kate has been largely positive because of the role she plays in the royal family.


When Meghan came along, however, she initially slipped into this aspect of the royal role very easily. Her background as an actor meant she was comfortable being in front of the cameras and engaging with the press, and she was able to handle a wide range of engagements with efficiency and grace. When reportage started focusing on Meghan’s different work accomplishments, William and Kate’s team quickly took notice and sprang into action, forcing her to change her approach.


There has been a lot reported on the relationship between Kate and Meghan. The initial distance between them stemmed from the rift between the brothers, but over time, it also widened because the two women have very little in common. Additionally, Kate was not particularly helpful or supportive to Meghan, despite also having come into the family as an outsider from a non-aristocratic background. Although Kate and Harry were once close, there is now no going back, especially after the Sussexes’ split from the royal family and the interview that aired after.


After Harry and Meghan’s departure, Kate was forced to come out even more into the public eye, and she has done so fairly successfully. She appeared on the Happy Mum, Happy Baby podcast and spoke up about a range of issues sincerely and vulnerably, including her struggles as a mother. She also took on engagements and projects more fitting to her background and skills. This included curating a well-received photography exhibit following the pandemic, calling on her sensibilities as an art history graduate and passionate photographer, and an exhibition match with teen ace Emma Raducanu, with Kate herself an avid tennis player.


While Kate has come a long way with the Palace’s help, her family background and upbringing have contributed. In addition to instilling values of resilience and acceptance, Kate’s family actively worked toward placing their daughter in aristocratic circles. They sent their three children to exclusive private schools, and Kate’s mother especially encouraged her to take a gap year before attending the same university as William, the year he was to begin at St. Andrew’s. This ambition and resolve Kate inherited from her mother saw her through a long courtship—and even a brief breakup with William—before the couple eventually married in 2011.


After marriage, Kate disappeared into her royal role. Any negative tabloid coverage that existed about her before the wedding completely vanished, as Kate had the Firm’s support to mitigate these kinds of stories. This has also been helped by how reticent Kate has always been in sharing anything about her personal life, even before she married into royalty. The new Princess of Wales has proved that she is willing to sublimate herself completely into the demands of the role, unlike her predecessor, Diana.


However, Kate also distinguishes herself from other senior royals by the far fewer number of royal engagements she participates in. This stems from a focus on her family before the Crown; her duty is first and foremost to her children. Thus, there is a question mark about Kate’s future and how she will handle the increased work and public scrutiny, the closer she and William get to the throne. One will have to wait and see what happens when the time comes for her to step into the spotlight completely.

Chapters 11-12 Analysis

In this set of chapters, Scobie examines the stories of some of the women in the royal family. Specifically, he focuses on the varying experiences and impact of the three women who have come into the royal family as consorts to heirs. Diana, once the Princess of Wales, is an important part of the royal family’s legacy; Camilla, now the Queen, is shown to be old-fashioned, stoic, charming, and unaffected by royal pageantry; and Kate, the current Princess of Wales—who is as enigmatic but substantially less commanding than Queen Elizabeth II—is yet to prove her mettle.


Diana’s story, intertwined with Charles and Camilla’s, highlights the intersecting themes of Public Versus Personal Lives and Power and Image. Although she was the love of Charles’s life, Camilla was rejected as a suitable consort for him because of her reputation, especially in contrast to the young, aristocratic, “virginal” Diana. The latter, on paper, was the perfect partner for the future heir, as her youth suggested pliability. The persona and the person proved to be worlds apart, especially in Diana’s case, but also in Camilla’s. Diana refused to conform, and her marriage to Charles ended in disaster. Meanwhile, Camilla maintained her silence throughout the fallout from her affair with Charles, remaining steadfastly committed to the man she loved.


The public perception of Diana is also what allowed her to break away from the royal family’s characteristic mystery and secrecy, and share her personal story with the rest of the public. Although this was the stark opposite of the approach adopted by the Queen, it paid off for Diana just as the Queen’s strategy paid off for her. The Queen stayed indifferent to controversy by remaining mysterious; Diana endeared herself to the public by appearing vulnerable. The latter was possible because Diana was the “people’s princess”—the public loved her, and her marital and mental health struggles only earned her sympathy and revilement for Camilla.


Subsequently, after Diana’s exit and unfortunate death, a huge part of Camilla’s journey within the royal family involved the rehabilitation of her image. This was accomplished by both the PR machinery of the royal family and Camilla’s efforts. Another important thread, however, was revising and rewriting the Diana narrative to erase what was ugly or uncomfortable for the Firm. To this effort, having the BBC Panorama interview taken off the air was a big win for the royal family. Even more significant was William’s statement following the investigation, which effectively weakened Diana’s overall credibility. Thus, Diana and Camilla’s intertwined stories showcase the power of image and perception, and how the public persona interacts with the personal lives of the royal family.


Against this backdrop, Kate emerges as the least problematic consort to an heir. Her natural reticence is less problematic than Diana’s ability to command the spotlight, and her willingness to comply is her most appreciable quality. While Kate distinguishes herself from the older generation of royals by prioritizing her children above her royal duty at times, her other qualities are favorable enough that she receives the Firm’s full protection, including in the media. This is starkly different from the treatment Meghan received when she married into the family, Diana received after she left it, and Camilla received while she was still only Charles’s love (but in line with the support she was given after she married Charles). Protected by the monarchy because of her position and her personality, Scobie reserves judgment on Kate’s success until the time she has to completely step into the spotlight and manage its demands in their entirety.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs