49 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
One of the major themes running through Confederates in the Attic is the idea of loss. Loss is an ever-present topic that appears in countless numbers of conversations had between Horwitz and his subjects:“The South—the white South—has always had this powerful sense of loss” (87), or “Northerners say, ‘Forget the war, it’s over.’ But they don’t have the family Bibles we do, filled with all these kinfolk who went off to war and died. We’ve lost so much’” (26). For many Southerners, this loss is palpable, and the war is something that is recent, rather than a mere historical event, and “the south is a good place to look at what America used to be” (86). Because of this, remembrance serves not only as a way to honor those who served and sacrificed during the conflict, it also is a way of carrying on and trying to recreate the images and ideals that were prevalent in the South at that time. For many Southerners, remembrance is an active way to keep the South alive: “It seemed a wistful logic; the Cause was lost but the Lost Cause shouldn’t be” (79).
Often, the nostalgia for the golden age of the antebellum South is used as a way to remove people from the struggles and aimlessness of their everyday lives:
If I could trade places with my great-great-grandpappy, I’d do it in a second. Life was harder then but in a way it was simpler. He didn’t have to pay phone bills, put gas in the car, worry about crime. And he knew what he was living for (133).
The idea of having a purpose dominates much of the Southern nostalgia regarding the Civil War. Having lost the war, Southerners and Southern states no longer retained the autonomy that they had prior to 1861, and thus often feel slightly lesser, compared to their Northern counterparts: “The war is emotionally still on. I call it the thousand-year war. It will go on for a thousand years, or until we get back into the Union on equal terms” (67).
Moreover, in an attempt to make sense of the war and its fallout, much myth-making has come to replace the factual histories that governed the time period. Films such as Gone with the Wind, which offer whimsical images of Rhett Butler and Scarlett O’Hara, have embedded themselves in the popular consciousness of Southerner and Northerner alike, thereby coloring the way many modern-day Americans think of the war and the Southern way of life that was centered on family, agriculture, and a chivalric sense of honor. In many ways, Gone with the Wind and films like it have “done more to keep the Civil War alive, and to mold its memory, than any history book or event since Appomattox” (296). This has helped frame the Civil War less as a struggle over the institution of slavery and more a struggle over whether regional or central government should wield the most power in the United States of America, and has given rise to the myth that the South was a noble underdog fighting an aggressive North in order to maintain its simple and honorable way of life, as well as its local sovereignty. In doing so, the popular consciousness has turned many Southern figures into folk heroes: “That was our Homeric period and the figures loom up only a little less than gods” (385). Even those who attempt to re-create the battles of the war tend towards playing the Southern role because to be Northern feels like being an aggressor against a people who wanted nothing more than to go on enjoying a specific way of life (136).
However, this elegiac remembrance furthers the problem of discussing the true causes of the war and the fallout caused by it, and it leads to a black and white division between white Southerners and African-Americans who each have completely different recollections of what the antebellum South represented:
Viewed through this prism, the War of Northern Aggression had little to do with slavery. Rather it was a culture war in which Yankees imposed their imperialist and capitalistic will on the agrarian South…the North’s triumph, in turn, condemned the nation to centralized industrial society and all the ills that came with it (69).
While for many white Southerners the past is a golden age, to African-Americans glorification of the old South and its way of life is nothing more than a longing to bring back slavery and their status as second-class citizens, such that modern-day conversations about how one should “honor” the memory of the Confederacy often break down along racial lines.
Horwitz states that “[f]or the past several weeks people had been talking to me about ‘heritage.’ But, like the flag, this obviously meant very different things to different people” (80).For many of the people interviewed in Confederates in the Attic the word “heritage” is a flashpoint that immediate locates one as for or against the display and veneration of Confederate symbols and relics. Some, like the historian Shelby Foote, argue that images like the Confederate Battle Flag are not correct in their logic, as it was “a combat standard, not a political symbol” (153) that “stood for law, honor, love of country” (153), while others, especially those in the African-American community, view the flag as a symbol of their oppression, and find “worship of the Confederacy” (43) offensive.
In addition to this, for many white Southerners, honoring one’s heritage means honoring one’s ancestors and the individual people, such that there is the ability to differentiate the people who fought in the war from the political aims of the government they were fighting for: “I think of myself as a liberal Confederate…I want the history preserved, and I think the Confederacy’s a great story about men who did incredible things. But I don’t subscribe to a lot of the politics that comes with it” (246).
In the mind of many white Southerners, heritage encompasses two major ideas: family and place/land. To them, “A Southerner—a true Southerner, of which there aren’t many left—is more related to the land, to the home place” (262) than their Northern counterpart, such that it isn’t hard to find examples of people who still “lived in the same 1840s where he [Gordon Cotton], his father, grandfather and great-grandfather had all been born (201).
However, the counterargument made by those who see the veneration of Southern heritage is that such a mindset is antiquated and backward looking, a kin to “saying we’re dedicated to no hope, no future. It’s like having a monument to unrequited love” (252). Furthermore, because of the way in which the Confederate Flag was used during the Civil Rights movement, it began to be associated with “good ol’ boy in pickup trucks… so now it’s a symbol of evil to a great many people” (154) because “for many white Southerners, the flag had also symbolized defiance and segregation at a time when they felt under siege again by the federal government and by Northerners who wanted to change the South’s ‘way of life’’ (78). For many African-Americans, it is impossible to separate the politics from the symbol: “your great-grandfather fought and died because he believed my great-grandfather should stay a slave […] Remember your ancestors […] but remember what they fought for too, and recognize it was wrong” (44).
One cannot tell the story of the American South without also including its history of slavery, Reconstruction, and the Civil Rights struggle for African-Americans. Confederates in the Attic explores this theme both directly and indirectly as Horwitz travels through the South. What is often apparent is the continued distrust and distance that is present between white and African-American communities:“but you didn’t see nobody black at those meetings, did you…anything you got to do with your own kind in secret, something’s wrong with it” (43). In contrast to this, Horwitz repeatedly encounters working class whites who feel as though things have been constantly taken away from them and that they have very little left that they can call their own:
All my life it’s been one thing after another. First they integrated the schools. Then they integrated everything. Then they say ‘colored’ ain’t right anymore, it’s got to be ‘black’ then ‘African-American.’ But nothing changes for us. We’re still ‘crackers’ and ‘peckerwoods’ and ‘rednecks.’ I feel like I’ve swallowed enough for one lifetime. (80)
There are a handful of moments where Horwitz does encounter Southerners who state how it is imperative that the two groups eventually come together in order to make the region successful, economically viable, and to erase the stereotypes many outsiders have of the region: “Listen, I’m thirty-eight, I grew up in the New South. We’ve all got to get along, black and white. If we do, we can really go somewhere. If we don’t we’ll keep getting dumped on” (85). However, Horwitz thinks that too often it feels as though the people have “lost the art of conversation, of just being neighbors” (139).
Horwitz also highlights the new militancy that seems to have found a home among younger African-Americans who “aren’t going to just take it like our parents did” (105):
why should we go and watch some reenactment that honors the Southern way of life…the money I pay for that just continues to oppress us. Only a few whites come to our bridge reenactment. They’re signaling that our history isn’t important. So why should we join in theirs? (368)
Even within the African-American community, though, there appears to be a rift between those who believe “it’s depressing because so little has really changed,” (364) and those who say “history’s changed and I wouldn’t be here if it hadn’t” (356). In these moments, Horwitz presents a microcosm of a problem that continues to afflict the South, namely the distrust between the races and the disagreements within them. It is a problem which, though he has tried to understand and address, seems to be self-perpetuating and without answer, even though many, white and black alike, are attempting to work out a definitive and all-encompassing solution.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Action & Adventure
View Collection
American Civil War
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Memoir
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
The Past
View Collection