Chip War

Discuss the role of individual visionaries and innovators, such as Jack Kilby, Morris Chang, and Gordon Moore, in shaping the semiconductor industry. How does Miller portray their contributions, and to what extent does the book emphasize individual vs. collective impact on technological progress?

Explore the implications of Miller’s comparison of the current tech competition between the United States and China to the “Sputnik moment.” How does this analogy frame the stakes of the semiconductor industry in modern geopolitics, and what lessons can be drawn from the historical context Miller provides to address current challenges?

Chip War portrays Taiwan as a central player in the semiconductor industry. Examine the island’s role within the global tech landscape and discuss how its strategic importance influences both regional stability and international relations.

Evaluate the economic and ethical considerations presented in Chip War surrounding intellectual property and technology transfer. How does Miller address the tension between innovation and theft, and how does this tension shape the strategies of nations and corporations alike?

Assess Miller’s portrayal of Moore’s Law and its projected “end” in the near future. How does the concept of Moore’s Law function as both a scientific and cultural metaphor in the book, and what might its potential decline signify for global technological development?

In what ways does the book explore the theme of interdependence and vulnerability within the global supply chain? How does Miller argue that “weaponized interdependence” might impact future conflicts or alliances?

Examine how Miller presents the historical evolution of Silicon Valley. How does his portrayal highlight the relationship between localized innovation and the broader shift toward a more globalized tech economy?

Discuss the literary techniques Miller uses to present technical and political content in a way that is accessible and engaging. In what ways does his narrative approach bridge the gap between expert-level technical knowledge and broader public understanding of geopolitical stakes?