55 pages • 1 hour read
In this chapter, Hari briefly examines the philosophical questions of why people use drugs and whether controlled drug usage is harmful. He begins by explaining that the war on drugs is technically not about ending addiction but rather ending worldwide drug use everywhere. Hari shares an anecdote about how research has scientifically proven that various animals purposely intoxicate themselves in the natural world. His purpose here is to show that two separate arguments support pushing for drug law reforms. The first argument is simply that drugs are bad, but prohibition is worse because it adds many other problems as well. According to Hari, “in this argument, we are all antidrug” (148). The second argument, however—which is much more difficult to make but perhaps more honest—is simply that most drug users do not become addicts and are not harming themselves by using their drug, so prohibition is unnecessary. He argues that “there is such a thing as responsible drug use, and it is the norm, not the exception” (148).
Next, Hari looks at the historical roots of intoxication and finds that “there has never been a society in which humans didn’t serially seek out these sensations” (149).
Plus, gain access to 8,500+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Johann Hari
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Books Made into Movies
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Health & Medicine
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection