53 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The title All the Pretty Horses alludes to a traditional American lullaby, “All the Pretty Little Horses,” which is of unclear origin. The horses of the lullaby are a promise to a child and an invocation to dream, and McCarthy taps into that desire in John Grady’s character, whose love and respect for horses is a clear driver of his journey and his identity; when he’s in prison, the novel even goes so far as to say “horses [are] always the right thing to think about” (204). McCarthy evokes the lullaby to connect John Grady’s infatuation with an idealized version of the American West to the living animals that embody his dreams and values.
Horses are often described with lush detail, emphasizing their inextricable role in ranching life and vaquero culture. McCarthy builds on this portrayal to establish a dual identity in horses in Part 2. First, horses are natural beings that belong outside of the domain of humanity and have a spiritual significance. When they are up in the mountains, an old man John Grady works with tells him “it would be pointless to speak of no horses in the world for God would not permit such a thing” (111). In this habitat, the animals are wild and free, and the novel positions them as more virtuous than humanity and as corrupted by man, though the old man also takes pains to note that horses love war as man does. McCarthy aligns the wild horses with the notion of the “wild west” or American frontier, a common symbolic alignment in the western genre. To John Grady, horses are the living essence of the world in its natural—and best—state.
The second identity of horses is a more pragmatic one: They are drivers of the economy and lifestyle that John Grady loves. He has a deep knowledge of horsemanship and an encyclopedic understanding of the lineage and ownership of famous horses. Though John Grady idealizes wild horses and the uncorrupted natural world, he and Rawlins are aligned with humanity in their taming and training of the mountain colts. For John Grady, the solution to this cognitive dissonance is to place it beyond his expertise, as when Rawlins asks why rubbing a towel over a horse calms it, and John Grady replies, “I dont know. […] I aint a horse” (106). With this pithy dismissal, John Grady attempts to elevate his vocation from practical know-how to spiritual stewardship of the animals he reveres. The name of the ranch, La Purísima, translates to “purest” in English, echoing John Grady’s belief that ranching is the highest and most natural pursuit of a man. At La Purísima, John Grady believes he can live a pure—meaning uncompromised—life.
John Grady sees his connection to horses and his success and happiness in working with them as the primary source of value in his life, and horses relate to or influence most of his significant experiences in the novel. His romance with Alejandra is built around a mutual love for the animals and begins with each of them riding a horse acquired explicitly for sexual reproduction; his sense of responsibility toward his, Blevins’s, and Rawlins’s mounts drives his mission to get them back from the captain. He is also in the greatest peril when separated from his horse. After the captain confiscates their horses, Blevins is murdered, and John Grady and Rawlins are incarcerated. Later, in the shootout, it’s specifically John Grady’s connection to the horses that saves him—his awareness of where Blevins’s horse is looking helps him predict an ambush, and his knowledge of how his horses will react to gunfire helps him control the situation. Horses represent the world that John Grady understands and navigates best.
At the end of the novel, John Grady still loves horses, but he now bears the weight of responsibility for Blevins’s horse, a constant reminder of his failure to save Blevins’s life and his desire to enact vengeance. The horse-centered culture of the American West is changing, but John Grady is determined to cling to it, even as some elements of it are now reminders of the pain and loss he’s suffered.
John Grady has a relatively simple, unwavering set of beliefs that inform his actions: Horses are good, romantic love is worthwhile on its own terms, and doing the right thing is the only possible choice. This system of value puts him out of step with the world around him, as his rigidity around these values leads him to actions he knows are dangerous for himself and the people he cares about, especially Rawlins and Alejandra. One of the central tragedies of the story is that John Grady’s good intentions don’t translate into how his actions are perceived by the people around him. John Grady struggles to navigate a world that is filled by people who are more interested in upholding corrupt systems than rewarding righteousness, either from a belief that they are immutable or from self-interest.
John Grady encounters early challenges to his system of belief when the ranch is sold, but he is able to reinforce his worldview by examining and then rejecting his mother’s values. As soon as Blevins enters the novel, John Grady’s unswerving virtue truly begins to be tested. The pragmatic Rawlins repeatedly warns John Grady that Blevins will be trouble for them, but John Grady cannot help but see Blevins as someone in need of help, especially after he loses his horse and clothes in a thunderstorm. This plays out in quiet acts—like John Grady picking up Blevins’s hat when he loses it and keeping it safe for him—and in large ones, like agreeing to stick by him despite his impulsive, dangerous plan to retrieve his horse. McCarthy places John Grady in sharp contrast to the people they meet on their journey, like the wax makers who offer to buy Blevins. John Grady sees a world ready to harm a child, whereas Rawlins understands the potential costs of helping Blevins, and sees him as a problem that they should avoid.
In Part 3, John Grady’s beliefs become more difficult to maintain and are ultimately compromised by his need to survive. This begins with the death of Blevins, which shows just how ugly humanity can be. Even in his outrage, John Grady is powerless to do anything about it. This sets him on a path to further compromising his beliefs, including when he kills his attacker in self-defense and then treats the captain cruelly and believes he might kill him. Still, in Part 4, John Grady clings to the hope that the rightness of his and Alejandra’s love can transcend the cultural obstacles their relationship faces. Again, he is disappointed. Even though Dueña Alfonsa concedes that the world is unfair, she suggests to John Grady that it is only possible to successfully navigate the world as it already exists, rather than how it ought to be.
As the novel begins, the world is already slipping away from John Grady. By novel’s end, this process is complete, but he is still unshaken in his belief that goodness exists. What has changed is that he is no longer sure it exists in him, and he’s unsure if humankind can access it at all. In the closing pages, John Grady feels “wholly alien to the world although he loved it still. He thought that in the beauty of the world were hid a secret” (282); the problem is not that virtue doesn’t exist, it’s that the nature of humanity is to descend into self-preservation, cruelty, and selfishness. McCarthy portrays immutable values as ethically honorable, but naïve and destined to lead to disillusionment. John Grady’s ideals have failed him, and the world has won.
The difference between John Grady’s and Rawlins’s expectations of Mexico and the reality they encounter there is a central tension in the novel. The consequences they face for misinterpreting situations or disregarding cultural norms define the second half of the story, whether through the outcome of John Grady’s relationship with Alejandra or their inability to navigate the corrupt legal system. Through the tragic conclusion to John Grady’s adventure, McCarthy interrogates how social conventions frustrate personal values and posits that rejecting these conventions does not inure a person to their influence.
As a young woman from a wealthy family, Alejandra lives under certain expectations that she’s eager to push back against: She rides horses well, favors European riding gear, and moves about La Purísima with a freedom she suggests her mother doesn’t permit in Mexico City. Despite living in a family with conservative, gender-normative values, she has agency, and her father expects her to rebel. However, Don Héctor expected her rebellion to be through pursuing European education or some other socially acceptable transgression of tradition. That Alejandra has a relationship with John Grady—who occupies dual roles as a foreigner with few prospects and a young horseman Don Héctor finds promising—reveals that he has far less control over his daughter than he desires, and than social norms of the time permit him to exercise. His response to his daughter’s rebellion is cruel and authoritarian, and nearly leads to the murders of Rawlins and John Grady in prison. Dueña Alfonsa takes a similar authoritarian mindset to bring Alejandra in line, though her methods are subtler, and she is working from a belief that disillusionment is inevitable and should be managed carefully to avoid the very consequences Alejandra ends up facing: estrangement from her father.
After John Grady and Rawlins’s arrest, they enter a bewildering criminal justice system in which money and answers are expected of them that they aren’t able to provide. It’s revealed that they have not considered even basic forms of documentation (with Rawlins’s destroyed wallet serving as a key piece of evidence that they’re liars), and their defiant attitude toward the captain puts them in further danger—the rural authorities in Mexico aren’t interested in due process, and the boys fail to understand that. The consequences in Saltillo are similarly steep: As Pérez indicates, they are expected to pay a bribe to secure their safety and release, and they are in danger because they don’t understand what is expected of them as Americans or how to navigate the social power dynamics of the prison. In this case, John Grady and Rawlins fail to fulfill social expectations mostly through naivete, rather than active rebellion.
Not all of the misunderstanding is across national lines: Dueña Alfonsa is quick to point out that the key mistake that Francisco Madero made was in believing the Mexican people were capable of embracing his idealistic outlook for the future of Mexican governance, and Alejandra underestimates how firmly her father is embedded in traditional ideas of masculinity and femininity. Each of the characters who face tragedy in the novel is set on that path by a failure to understand or take seriously the larger cultural pressures that they’re facing and the role that they’re compelled to inhabit. The punishment for this is outsized, cruel, and inevitable, suggesting that humanity’s natural impulse is authoritarian control.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Cormac McCarthy
American Literature
View Collection
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
National Book Critics Circle Award...
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
Westerns
View Collection