A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1998
Book Brief
BetaA Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1998176
Book • Nonfiction
United States • 1990s
•
Politics & Government•
World History1998
Adult
18+ years
Super Short Summary
In A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, Antonin Scalia explores the principles of textualism in legal contexts. He argues for an interpretation of laws based strictly on their text, without considering extrinsic factors like legislative intent. The book includes responses from legal scholars, contributing to a broader discussion on judicial philosophies and statutory interpretation.
Informative
Contemplative
Challenging
Reviews & Readership
1,092 ratings
Loved it
Mixed feelings
Not a fan
Review Roundup
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is praised for Scalia's incisive argument for textualism, offering insightful critiques of judicial activism. Readers appreciate its clear prose and compelling logic. However, some criticize it for being overly rigid and dismissive of alternative views. Scalia's robust defense of originalism sparks valuable debate on legal interpretation.
Who Should Read A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law?
A reader interested in A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law is likely intrigued by legal theory, constitutional interpretation, or the judicial philosophies of Supreme Court justices. Fans of Robert Bork's The Tempting of America or Clarence Thomas's My Grandfather's Son would enjoy its insights into textualism and originalism debates.
1,092 ratings
Loved it
Mixed feelings
Not a fan
176
Book • Nonfiction
United States • 1990s
•
Politics & Government•
World History1998
Adult
18+ years
We’re just getting started
Add this title to our list of requested Study Guides!