44 pages • 1 hour read
Peterson insists that, by nature, humans compare themselves to each other. They look to peers or competitors for standards of success and failure. This tendency is destructive and distortive because the various undertakings everyone performs in their lives occur within highly individual, complex, and intersectional contexts. Peterson discusses how a person can train him- or herself out of this type of thinking.
Peterson notes that there are some merits to comparison, as everything does not exist in a vacuum. He says, “Standards of better or worse are not illusory or unnecessary” (87). People can and should make “value judgments” that assess things like risk, reward, right, and wrong. Comparison becomes problematic when it becomes a way to repeatedly put one’s self down in the fashion of the “cliché of nihilism,” where “There will always be people better than you” (87).
Peterson suggests first taking stock of the various immediate circumstances that will determine notions of possibilities, success, and failure (93). With a more level analysis of the stakes at hand, a person can make more empowered decisions that avoid the pitfalls of nihilistic dismissal of everything as hopeless. Peterson also advocates steadily aiming higher with goals, a process made possible by being a better boss when a person self-talks, rather than being a tyrant (95-96).
Plus, gain access to 8,550+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
American Literature
View Collection
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection